Preconditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates the neuroplastic effect of subsequent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied during cycling in young adults

被引:6
|
作者
Pourmajidian, Maryam [1 ]
Lauber, Benedikt [2 ]
Sidhu, Simranjit K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Med Sch, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Fribourg, Dept Neurosci & Movement Sci, Fribourg, Switzerland
关键词
Corticospinal excitability; Neuromodulation; Cycling exercise; Homeostatic metaplasticity; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; MOTOR CORTEX PLASTICITY; AEROBIC EXERCISE; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; SINGLE BOUT; INDUCTION; TDCS; METAPLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134597
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The study aimed to examine the effect of a pre-conditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) before subsequent anodal-tDCS (atDCS) was applied during low workload cycling exercise on the corticospinal responses in young healthy individuals. Eleven young subjects participated in two sessions receiving either conditioning ctDCS or sham stimulation, followed by atDCS while cycling (i.e. ctDCS-atDCS, sham-atDCS) at 1.2 times their body weight (84 +/- 20 W) in a counterbalanced double-blind design. Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation with the intensity set to produce an MEP amplitude of 1 mV in a resting hand muscle at baseline (PRE), following preconditioning tDCS (POST - COND) and post atDCS combined with cycling exercise (POST-TEST). There was a significant interaction between time and intervention (P < 0.01) on MEPs. MEPs increased from PRE (1.0 +/- 0.06 mV) to POST-TEST (1.3 +/- 0.06 mV) during ctDCS-atDCS (P < 0.001) but did not change significantly across time during sham-atDCS (P > 0.7). Furthermore, MEPs were higher in ctDCS-atDCS compared to sham-atDCS (both P < 0.01) at POST - COND (ctDCS-atDCS: 1.1 +/- 0.06 mV, sham-atDCS: 1.0 +/- 0.06 mV) and POST-TEST (ctDCS-atDCS: 1.3 +/- 0.06 mV, sham-atDCS: 1.0 +/- 0.06 mV). These outcomes demonstrate that pre-conditioning cathodal tDCS can enhance subsequent corticospinal excitability changes induced by anodal tDCS applied in combination with cycling exercise. The findings have implications for the application of tDCS in combination with cycling exercise in rehabilitation and sporting contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cathodal skin lesions in a tattoo following transcranial direct current stimulation
    Maas, Roderick P. P. W. M.
    van de Warrenburg, Bart P. C.
    Schutter, Dennis J. L. G.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (02) : 284 - 286
  • [32] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation?
    Priori, Aberto
    Hallett, Mark
    Rothwell, John C.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2009, 2 (04) : 241 - 245
  • [33] Comparing the effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex at varying intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults
    Mousavi, Sheida
    Mottahedi, Amin
    Ehsani, Fatemeh
    Delkhosh, Cyrus Taghizadeh
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 60 (10) : 6543 - 6555
  • [34] Differential Cortical Effect Modulated by Anodal, Cathodal and Bihemispheric Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Patients With Ischemic Stroke
    Chhatbar, Pratik Y.
    DeVries, William
    Grattan, Emily
    Kautz, Steven A.
    Feng, Wuwei
    STROKE, 2020, 51
  • [35] EFFECTS OF TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION ON POSTURAL SWAY IN YOUNG ADULTS
    Rejimon, Abinand
    Moussa-Tooks, Alexandra
    Lundin, Nancy
    Mitroi, Jessica
    Burroughs, Leah
    Saberi, Shahin
    Bolbecker, Amanda
    O'Donnell, Brian
    Hetrick, William
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 54 : S162 - S162
  • [36] The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults
    Loftus, Andrea M.
    Yalcin, Ozgur
    Baughman, Frank D.
    Vanman, Eric J.
    Hagger, Martin S.
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 5 (05):
  • [37] Preconditioning with Cathodal High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Sensitizes the Primary Motor Cortex to Subsequent Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
    Dai, Wenjun
    Geng, Yao
    Liu, Hao
    Guo, Chuan
    Chen, Wenxiang
    Ma, Jinhui
    Chen, Jinjin
    Jia, Yanbing
    Shen, Ying
    Wang, Tong
    NEURAL PLASTICITY, 2021, 2021
  • [38] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia
    Obermann, M.
    Bude, V.
    Naegel, S.
    Holle, D.
    Diener, H. -C.
    Hagenacker, T.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2014, 261 : S39 - S39
  • [39] Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (atDCS) on Sentence Comprehension
    Lum, Jarrad A. G.
    Clark, Gillian M.
    Rogers, Caitlyn M.
    Skalkos, James D.
    Fuelscher, Ian
    Hyde, Christian
    Enticott, Peter G.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 25 (03) : 331 - 335
  • [40] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of MPFC enhances humor processing
    Manfredi, Mirella
    Proverbio, Alice Mado
    Marques, Lucas Murrins
    Ribeiro, Beatriz
    Nakao Morello, Leticia Yumi
    Boggio, Paulo Sergio
    SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 15 (02) : 199 - 213