Survey of egg producers on the introduction of alternative housing systems for laying hens in Flanders, Belgium

被引:17
|
作者
Tuyttens, F. A. M. [1 ]
Sonck, B. [1 ]
Staes, M. [1 ]
Van Gansbeke, S. [2 ]
Van den Bogaert, T. [2 ]
Ampe, B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Agr & Fisheries Res ILVO, Anim Sci Unit, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
[2] Dept Agr & Fisheries, Sustainable Agr Dev Div, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Physiol & Biometr, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
关键词
aviary; egg producer; furnished cage; laying hen; survey; FEATHER PECKING; WELFARE ASSESSMENT; CAGES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3382/ps.2010-01122
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In the context of the European Union ban on battery cages by 2012, a survey was conducted among Flemish egg producers (60%. response rate, 140 completed questionnaires) about the introduction and opinion of alternative housing systems. Belgium appears to be among the countries in the European Union that are slower to adopt alternative housing. Belgium's egg industry is thus likely to undergo drastic changes to comply with the 2012 deadline. As of 2010, the battery cage was the dominant housing system (56% housing units, 67% hens), followed by floor housing (33% housing units, 15% hens) and aviary (10% housing units, 15% hens), whereas colony cages and furnished cages were extremely rare. Future- and market-oriented production was the most important reason for choosing a certain type of alternative system, although the importance of hen performance and amount of labor seemed to increase. A quarter of the producers with battery cages had detailed plans to convert to an alternative system (most planned to install aviaries, followed by colony cages, furnished cages, and floor housing) by 2012. Many older farmers indicated that they would stop farming, whereas others found it more profitable to delay the conversion as long as possible. Apart from hen welfare, producers expressed a negative opinion (relative to battery cages) about noncage systems and, to a lesser extent, furnished cages. However, users of alternative systems reported being quite satisfied, except for the amount of labor and hen health. The housing system had several effects on user satisfaction: positive effect of flock size, negative effect of experience with battery cages, and negative effect of outdoor area on hen health. Although not all opinions were supported by evidence, such surveys provide feedback about the success of alternative systems in practice. This information is valuable to further improve these systems and to producers who have yet to convert. Moreover, producer attitude may determine the extent to which legally imposed changes in husbandry environment result in the desired improvement of hen welfare in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 950
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An explorative investigation of air quality in alternative housing systems for laying hens focussing on biological agents
    Blomberg, N.
    Rieger, M. A.
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 2008, 68 (09): : 369 - 378
  • [22] Analysis of the egg shell stability and the bone strength of laying hens in three different hen housing systems
    Leyendecker, M
    Hamann, H
    Hartung, J
    Glünder, G
    Nogossek, N
    Neumann, U
    Sürie, C
    Kamphues, J
    Distl, O
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2002, 74 (02): : 144 - 155
  • [23] Effects of Housing Systems on Production Performance, Egg Quality, Tonic Immobility and Feather Score in Laying Hens
    Erek, Mert
    Matur, Erdal
    VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE, 2024, 10 (06)
  • [24] Egg quality of laying hens in different conditions of storage, ages and housing densities
    de Menezes, Pasquoal Carrazzoni
    de Lima, Evilda Rodrigues
    de Medeiros, Juliana Pinto
    Ketruy de Oliveira, Wanessa Noadya
    Evencio-Neto, Joaquim
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 41 (09): : 2064 - 2069
  • [25] Importance of the rearing period for laying hens in alternative systems
    Staack, M.
    Gruber, B.
    Keppler, Ch.
    Zaludik, K.
    Niebuhr, K.
    Knierim, U.
    DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2007, 114 (03): : 86 - 90
  • [26] Epidermiology of Dermanyssus galline and Acaricidal efficacy of phoxim 50% in alternative housing Systems laying period of hens
    Meyer-Kuehling, B.
    Heine, J.
    Mueller-Lindloff, J.
    Pfister, K.
    PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH, 2007, 101 (Suppl 1) : S1 - S12
  • [27] Effects of housing systems and laying phases on external and internal egg quality characteristics of indigenous guinea fowl hens
    Idowu, Olubukola P. A.
    Kareem, Damilola U.
    Oke, Oyegunle E.
    Adeyeye, Emmanuel A.
    Sogunle, Olajide M.
    Idowu, Olusegun M. O.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 8
  • [28] Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range)
    Dikmen, B. Yilmaz
    Ipek, A.
    Sahan, U.
    Petek, M.
    Sozcu, A.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2016, 95 (07) : 1564 - 1572
  • [29] Salmonella incidence in broiler and laying hens with the different housing systems
    Pieskus, Juozas
    Kazeniauskas, Edvardas
    Butrimaite-Ambrozeviciene, Ceslova
    Stanevicius, Zenonas
    Mauricas, Mykolas
    JOURNAL OF POULTRY SCIENCE, 2008, 45 (03): : 227 - 231
  • [30] Ascarid infections in laying hens kept in different housing systems
    Jansson, Desiree S.
    Nyman, Ann
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Christensson, Dan
    Goransson, Magnus
    Fossum, Oddvar
    Hoglund, Johan
    AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 39 (06) : 525 - 532