Relational memory for object identity and spatial location in rats with lesions of perirhinal cortex, amygdala and hippocampus

被引:22
|
作者
Moses, SN
Cole, C
Ryan, JD
机构
[1] Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Psychol, Albuquerque, NM 87109 USA
关键词
learning; classical conditioning; place preference; medial temporal;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.02.029
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previous studies dissociate medial temporal lobe regions using non-relational object versus relational spatial tasks. We compared a relational object identity task to the commonly used, relational spatial Morris water task. Lesions of perirhinal cortex, amygdala and hippocampus led to impaired performance on only the relational object preference task. Rats with perirhinal cortex and amygdala lesions performed normally on the Morris water task, but showed reduced perseveration in the correct quadrant on the probe trial. Rats with hippocampal damage were impaired on all measures of the Morris water task. Our findings demonstrate that perirhinal and amygdala damage creates impairments for relational tasks that rely on information processed by these structures (object identity and stimulus valence, respectively). In addition, these structures contribute non-essentially to performance of relational spatial tasks. The hippocampus is critical for all tasks that require the use of relational representations, regardless of whether the disambiguating information is provided by object identity or spatial arrangements. The current pattern of results suggests that the previous object-spatial dissociations among medial temporal lobe regions may be due to the relational nature of the spatial tasks versus the non-relational nature of the object tasks. Further, they illustrate that discrete dissociations among different types of processing may be an oversimplification. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 512
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dissociation in retrograde memory for object object recognition in rats with perirhinal discriminations and cortex damage
    Mumby, DG
    Glenn, MJ
    Nesbitt, C
    Kyriazis, DA
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 132 (02) : 215 - 226
  • [22] HIPPOCAMPUS, FIMBRIA FORNIX, AMYGDALA, AND MEMORY - OBJECT DISCRIMINATIONS IN RATS
    WIBLE, CG
    SHIBER, JR
    OLTON, DS
    BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 106 (05) : 751 - 761
  • [23] Olfactory learning and memory impairments following lesions to the hippocampus and perirhinal-entorhinal cortex
    Kaut, KP
    Bunsey, MD
    Riccio, DC
    BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 117 (02) : 304 - 319
  • [24] Dissociable effects of lesions to the perirhinal cortex and the postrhinal cortex on memory for context and objects in rats
    Norman, G
    Eacott, MJ
    BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 119 (02) : 557 - 566
  • [25] Disruption of spatial but not object-recognition memory by neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus in rats
    Duva, CA
    Floresco, SB
    Wunderlich, GR
    Lao, TL
    Pinel, JPJ
    Phillips, AG
    BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 111 (06) : 1184 - 1196
  • [26] Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?
    Malcolm W. Brown
    John P. Aggleton
    Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2001, 2 : 51 - 61
  • [27] Different contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to recognition memory
    Wan, HM
    Aggleton, JP
    Brown, MW
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 19 (03): : 1142 - 1148
  • [28] Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?
    Brown, MW
    Aggleton, JP
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 2 (01) : 51 - 61
  • [29] Sequential involvements of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus in the recall of item-location associative memory in macaques
    Yang, Cen
    Naya, Yuji
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2023, 21 (06)
  • [30] The role of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus in learning, memory, and perception
    Buckley, MJ
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION B-COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 58 (3-4): : 246 - 268