LI-RADS Version 2018 Ancillary Features at MRI

被引:92
|
作者
Cerny, Milena [1 ,2 ]
Chernyak, Victoria [3 ]
Olivie, Damien [1 ]
Billiard, Jean-Sebastien [1 ]
Murphy-Lavallee, Jessica [1 ]
Kielar, Ania Z. [4 ]
Elsayes, Khaled M. [5 ]
Bourque, Laurence [1 ]
Hooker, Jonathan C. [6 ]
Sirlin, Claude B. [6 ]
Tang, An [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Dept Radiol, 1000 Rue St Denis, Montreal, PQ H2X 0C2, Canada
[2] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Ctr Rech, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; ACID-ENHANCED MRI; CHRONIC LIVER-DISEASE; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; DATA SYSTEM V2014; HEPATOBILIARY-PHASE; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; SIGNAL-INTENSITY; DYSPLASTIC NODULES; HEPATIC HEMANGIOMAS;
D O I
10.1148/rg.2018180052
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) standardizes performance of liver imaging in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as interpretation and reporting of the results. Developed by experts in liver imaging and supported by the American College of Radiology, LI-RADS assigns to observations categories that reflect the relative probability of benignity, HCC, or other malignancy. While category assignment is based mainly on major imaging features, ancillary features may be applied to improve detection and characterization, increase confidence, or adjust LI-RADS categories. Ancillary features are classified as favoring malignancy in general, HCC in particular, or benignity. Those favoring malignancy in general or HCC in particular may be used to upgrade by a maximum of one category up to LR-4; those favoring benignity may be used to downgrade by a maximum of one category. If there are conflicting ancillary features (ie, one or more favoring malignancy and one or more favoring benignity), the category should not be adjusted. Ancillary features may be seen at diagnostic CT, MRI performed with extracellular agents, or MRI performed with hepatobiliary agents, with the exception of one ancillary feature assessed at US. This article focuses on LI-RADS version 2018 ancillary features seen at MRI. Specific topics include rules for ancillary feature application; definitions, rationale, and illustrations with clinical MRI examples; summary of evidence and diagnostic performance; pitfalls; and future directions. (C) RSNA, 2018
引用
收藏
页码:1973 / 2001
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Major and ancillary magnetic resonance features of LI-RADS to assess HCC: an overview and update
    Vincenza Granata
    Roberta Fusco
    Antonio Avallone
    Orlando Catalano
    Francesco Filice
    Maddalena Leongito
    Raffaele Palaia
    Francesco Izzo
    Antonella Petrillo
    Infectious Agents and Cancer, 12
  • [32] An update for LI-RADS: Version 2018. Why so soon after version 2017?
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Do, Richard K.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Santillan, Cynthia
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Cerny, Milena
    Tang, An
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Kamaya, Aya
    Kono, Yuko
    Arora, Sandeep S.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (06) : 1990 - 1991
  • [33] LI-RADS for MR Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Performance of Major and Ancillary Features
    Cerny, Milena
    Bergeron, Catherine
    Billiard, Jean-Sebastien
    Murphy-Lavallee, Jessica
    Olivie, Damien
    Berube, Joshua
    Fan, Boyan
    Castel, Helene
    Turcotte, Simon
    Perreault, Pierre
    Chagnon, Miguel
    Tang, An
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (01) : 118 - 128
  • [34] Prognostic performance of MRI LI-RADS version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors in alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma
    Wang, Leyao
    Feng, Bing
    Liang, Meng
    Li, Dengfeng
    Cong, Rong
    Chen, Zhaowei
    Wang, Sicong
    Ma, Xiaohong
    Zhao, Xinming
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (06) : 1918 - 1928
  • [35] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Ding, Jianmin
    Long, Lei
    Zhang, Xiang
    Chen, Chen
    Zhou, Hongyu
    Zhou, Yan
    Wang, Yandong
    Jing, Xiang
    Ye, Zhaoxiang
    Wang, Fengmei
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 847 - 854
  • [36] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Jianmin Ding
    Lei Long
    Xiang Zhang
    Chen Chen
    Hongyu Zhou
    Yan Zhou
    Yandong Wang
    Xiang Jing
    Zhaoxiang Ye
    Fengmei Wang
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 847 - 854
  • [37] LI-RADS major features: CT, MRI with extracellular agents, and MRI with hepatobiliary agents
    Santillan, Cynthia
    Fowler, Kathryn
    Kono, Yuko
    Chernyak, Victoria
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 75 - 81
  • [38] LI-RADS major features: CT, MRI with extracellular agents, and MRI with hepatobiliary agents
    Cynthia Santillan
    Kathryn Fowler
    Yuko Kono
    Victoria Chernyak
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 75 - 81
  • [39] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Adding Ancillary Features to MRI Compared with Enhancement Patterns at CT and MRI
    Park, Sungeun
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Yoo, Jeongin
    Kim, Se Woo
    Lee, Jeong Min
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (03) : 554 - 561
  • [40] Is MRI Better than CT for the LI-RADS?
    Ronot, Maxime
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (01)