Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox and Quantum Entanglement at Subnucleonic Scales

被引:74
|
作者
Tu, Zhoudunming [1 ]
Kharzeev, Dmitri E. [2 ,3 ]
Ullrich, Thomas [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Dept Phys, Upton, NY 11973 USA
[2] Brookhaven Natl Lab, RIKEN BNL Res Ctr, Upton, NY 11973 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Phys & Astron, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Phys, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
关键词
PARTON DISTRIBUTIONS; PROTON SCATTERING;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.062001
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) formulated an apparent paradox of quantum theory [Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)]. They considered two quantum systems that were initially allowed to interact and were then later separated. A measurement of a physical observable performed on one system then had to have an immediate effect on the conjugate observable in the other system-even if the systems were causally disconnected. The authors viewed this as a clear indication of the inconsistency of quantum mechanics. In the parton model of the nucleon formulated by Bjorken, Feynman, and Gribov, the partons (quarks and gluons) are viewed by an external hard probe as independent. The standard argument is that, inside the nucleon boosted to an infinite-momentum frame, the parton probed by a virtual photon with virtuality Q is causally disconnected from the rest of the nucleon during the hard interaction. Yet, the parton and the rest of the nucleon have to form a color-singlet state due to color confinement and so have to be in strongly correlated quantum states-we thus encounter the EPR paradox at the subnucleonic scale. In this Letter, we propose a resolution of this paradox based on the quantum entanglement of partons. We devise an experimental test of entanglement and carry it out using data on proton-proton collisions from the Large Hadron Collider. Our results provide a strong direct indication of quantum entanglement at subnucleonic scales.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Delayed-Choice Quantum Erasers and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
    Chiou, Dah-Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 62 (06)
  • [32] Delayed-Choice Quantum Erasers and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
    Dah-Wei Chiou
    International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 62
  • [33] EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN CONSTRAINTS ON QUANTUM ACTION AT A DISTANCE - THE SUTHERLAND PARADOX
    CUFAROPETRONI, N
    DEWDNEY, C
    HOLLAND, PR
    KYPRIANIDIS, A
    VIGIER, JP
    FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS, 1987, 17 (08) : 759 - 773
  • [34] WEINBERGS NONLINEAR QUANTUM-MECHANICS AND THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX
    POLCHINSKI, J
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1991, 66 (04) : 397 - 400
  • [35] Antiparticle in the light of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and Klein paradox
    Ni, GJ
    Guan, H
    Zhou, WM
    Yan, J
    CHINESE PHYSICS LETTERS, 2000, 17 (06) : 393 - 395
  • [36] THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX IN THE BRAIN - THE TRANSFERRED POTENTIAL
    GRINBERGZYLBERBAUM, J
    DELAFLOR, M
    ATTIE, L
    GOSWAMI, A
    PHYSICS ESSAYS, 1994, 7 (04) : 422 - 428
  • [37] The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and SU(2) relativity
    O'Hara, Paul
    11TH BIENNIAL CONFERENCE ON CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM RELATIVISTIC DYNAMICS OF PARTICLES AND FIELDS, 2019, 1239
  • [38] Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in single pairs of images
    Lantz, Eric
    Denis, Severine
    Moreau, Paul-Antoine
    Devaux, Fabrice
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2015, 23 (20): : 26472 - 26478
  • [39] Il Paradosso EPRThe Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
    Francesco De Martini
    Rendiconti Lincei, 2004, 15 (4):
  • [40] THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX FOR OBSERVABLES ENERGY TIME
    KLYSHKO, DN
    USPEKHI FIZICHESKIKH NAUK, 1989, 158 (02): : 327 - 341