Forest certification and FSC standard initiatives in collaborative forest management system in Nepal

被引:8
|
作者
Bhattarai, B. P. [1 ]
Kunwar, R. M. [2 ]
Kc, R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kathmandu Univ, Sch Educ, Lalitput, Nepal
[2] Florida Atlantic Univ, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[3] Dept Forest & Soil Conservat, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
certification; sustainable forest management; collaborative forest; governance;
D O I
10.1505/146554819827906852
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) principles and criteria have been implemented in over 80 community forests in Nepal over the last decade. However, the total size of community forests certified under the FSC certification is relatively small (0.1% of the total area of the country), which limits the overall benefits they can provide to the surrounding communities. The national government has instituted the Collaborative Forest Management (CFM) initiative to maintain forest connectivity and give local communities jurisdiction over the nearby forests that they and their ancestor have lived with and managed for many generations. The CFM policies strive to ensure the restoration of large and continuous patches of forest, equitable benefit sharing of forest products and good governance, yet these policies do not certify the forests as sustainably managed, and thus cannot provide increased prices on the international market for products from these forests. Two collaborative forests were assessed in the Tarai region of Nepal to understand how well these community managed forests already follow the FSC principles and where changes must be made for these forests to be certified in the future. Field observations were undertaken, focus group discussions held, and semi-structured interviews carried out in order to understand current management practices in these two collaborative managed forests. Findings showed that the CFM helped improve biodiversity and benefit sharing from the forest amongst the wide range of communities. Collaboratively managed forests and FSC principles were shown to have complementary objectives: to sustain forests, strengthen forest governance and conserve indigenous species and knowledge, and it is argued that these plans can be synchronized for the benefit of both forests and people.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 424
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biodiversity conservation through forest certification: key factors shapingnational Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) standard-development processesin Canada, Sweden, and Russia
    Elbakidze, Marine
    Dawson, Lucas
    McDermott, Constance L.
    Teitelbaum, Sara
    Tysiachniouk, Maria
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 27 (01):
  • [32] Forest certification and legality initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon: Lessons for effective and equitable forest governance
    McDermott, Constance L.
    Irland, Lloyd C.
    Pacheco, Pablo
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 50 : 134 - 142
  • [33] Effects of acquiring FSC forest management certification for Japanese enterprises using SmartWood AuditsOA附视频
    Katsuaki SUGIURA
    Takuyuki YOSHIOKA
    Kouki INOUE
    Journal of Forestry Research, 2012, (01) : 165 - 172
  • [34] Communicating sustainable development initiatives Applying co-orientation to forest management certification
    von Kutzschenbach, Michael
    Bronn, Carl
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 10 (03) : 304 - +
  • [35] FSC Canada's boreal forest standard unanimously approved
    不详
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2004, 80 (02): : 190 - 190
  • [36] Forest Certification in Collectively Owned Forest Areas and Sustainable Forest Management: A Case of Cooperative-Based Forest Certification in China
    Ming He
    Zhimin Wu
    Wei Li
    Yanru Zeng
    Small-scale Forestry, 2015, 14 : 245 - 254
  • [37] Forest Certification in Collectively Owned Forest Areas and Sustainable Forest Management: A Case of Cooperative-Based Forest Certification in China
    He, Ming
    Wu, Zhimin
    Li, Wei
    Zeng, Yanru
    SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2015, 14 (02) : 245 - 254
  • [38] Is collaborative forest management in Nepal able to provide benefits to distantly located users?
    Rai, Rajesh Kumar
    Dhakal, Arun
    Khadayat, Madan S.
    Ranabhat, Sunita
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 83 : 156 - 161
  • [39] EFFECTS OF DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION ON FOREST CARBON STOCKS IN COLLABORATIVE FORESTS, NEPAL
    Mandal, Ram Asheshwar
    Dutta, Ishwar Chandra
    Jha, Pramod Kumar
    Karmacharya, Sidhibir
    Yadav, Kamalesh
    Yadav, Bechu
    Thapa, Utsaw
    Haque, Samsul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2012, 3 (04) : 325 - 338
  • [40] Development and validation of a scale to measure the benefits of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification
    Fagundes, C.
    Schreiber, D.
    Nunes, M. P.
    Fernandes, M. E.
    Damacena, C.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2023, 25 (02) : 163 - 176