Forest certification and FSC standard initiatives in collaborative forest management system in Nepal

被引:8
|
作者
Bhattarai, B. P. [1 ]
Kunwar, R. M. [2 ]
Kc, R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kathmandu Univ, Sch Educ, Lalitput, Nepal
[2] Florida Atlantic Univ, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[3] Dept Forest & Soil Conservat, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
certification; sustainable forest management; collaborative forest; governance;
D O I
10.1505/146554819827906852
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) principles and criteria have been implemented in over 80 community forests in Nepal over the last decade. However, the total size of community forests certified under the FSC certification is relatively small (0.1% of the total area of the country), which limits the overall benefits they can provide to the surrounding communities. The national government has instituted the Collaborative Forest Management (CFM) initiative to maintain forest connectivity and give local communities jurisdiction over the nearby forests that they and their ancestor have lived with and managed for many generations. The CFM policies strive to ensure the restoration of large and continuous patches of forest, equitable benefit sharing of forest products and good governance, yet these policies do not certify the forests as sustainably managed, and thus cannot provide increased prices on the international market for products from these forests. Two collaborative forests were assessed in the Tarai region of Nepal to understand how well these community managed forests already follow the FSC principles and where changes must be made for these forests to be certified in the future. Field observations were undertaken, focus group discussions held, and semi-structured interviews carried out in order to understand current management practices in these two collaborative managed forests. Findings showed that the CFM helped improve biodiversity and benefit sharing from the forest amongst the wide range of communities. Collaboratively managed forests and FSC principles were shown to have complementary objectives: to sustain forests, strengthen forest governance and conserve indigenous species and knowledge, and it is argued that these plans can be synchronized for the benefit of both forests and people.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 424
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FSC forest management certification in the Americas
    Basso, V. M.
    Jacovine, L. A. G.
    Nardelli, A. M. B.
    Alves, R. R.
    Silva, E. V.
    Silva, M. L.
    Andrade, B. G.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2018, 20 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [2] FOREST CERTIFICATION AND FSC
    Miller, Katie J.
    Campbell, Terry
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2006, 1 (01): : 39 - 45
  • [3] Forest management certification in the Americas: difficulties in complying with the requirements of the FSC system
    Basso, V. M.
    Andrade, B. G.
    Jacovine, L. A. G.
    Silva, E., V
    Alves, R. R.
    Nardelli, A. M. B.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2020, 22 (02) : 169 - 188
  • [4] FSC - Forest stewardship council certification
    Washburn, MP
    Miller, KJ
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2003, 101 (08) : 8 - +
  • [5] Taan Forest Achieves FSC Certification
    不详
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2012, 88 (01): : 19 - 19
  • [6] Can forest certification imp rove forest management? Case study of the FSC certified Estonian State Forest Management Centre
    Hain, H.
    Ahas, R.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2007, 9 (03) : 759 - 770
  • [7] Experiences of a Forest Owners’ Cooperative in using FSC forest certification as an environmental strategy
    Ikuo Ota
    Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 2006, 5 (1) : 111 - 125
  • [8] Is Forest Certification a Hegemonic Force? The FSC and its Challengers
    Bloomfield, Michael John
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 21 (04): : 391 - 413
  • [9] FSC Canada's Forest Management Standard Technical Expert Panels
    不详
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2014, 90 (05): : 563 - 563
  • [10] Development of a forest certification standard compatible with PEFC and FSC's management requirements. A case study from Greece
    Georgiadis, Nicholas M.
    Cooper, R. J.
    FORESTRY, 2007, 80 (02): : 113 - 135