A comparison of three prediction models for predicting monthly precipitation in Liaoyuan city, China

被引:7
|
作者
Luo, Jiannan [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Wenxi [1 ]
Ji, Yefei [3 ]
Ye, Dajun [4 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Coll Environm & Resources, Minist Educ, Key Lab Groundwater Resources & Environm, 2519 Jiefang Rd, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Construct Engn Coll, 6 Ximinzhu St, Changchun 130026, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Water Resources, Songliao Water Resources Commiss, 4188 Jiefang Rd, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[4] Hydrol & Water Resources Bur Jilin Prov, Liaoyuan Subbur, 188 Renmin St, Liaoyuan 136200, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
artificial neural network; Kriging; Liaoyuan city; monthly precipitation; prediction; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SUMMER-MONSOON RAINFALL; INTERPOLATION; AUTOCORRELATION; REGIONS; WAVELET; INDIA;
D O I
10.2166/ws.2016.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate prediction of precipitation is of great importance for irrigation management and disaster prevention. In this study, back propagation artificial neural network (BPANN), radial basis function artificial neural network (RBFANN) and Kriging methods were applied and compared to predict the monthly precipitation of Liaoyuan city, China. An autocorrelation analysis method was used to determine model input variables first, and then BPANN, RBFANN and Kriging methods were applied to recognize the relationship between previous precipitation and later precipitation with the monthly precipitation data of 1971-2009 in Liaoyuan city. Finally, the three models' performances were compared based on models accuracy, models stability and models computational cost. Comparison results showed that for model accuracy, RBFANN performed best, followed by Kriging, and BPANN performed worst; for stability and computational cost, RBFANN and Kriging models performed better than the BPANN model. In conclusion, RBFANN is the best method for precipitation prediction in Liaoyuan city. Therefore, the developed RBFANN model was applied to predict the monthly precipitation for 2010-2019 in the study area.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 854
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation and Comparison of Three Power Prediction Models for CPV Modules
    Mundel, Hannah
    Treiber, Lara
    Dufour, Pascal
    Coish, Nicholas
    Fischer, Anton
    Myrskog, Stefan
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATOR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS (CPV-11), 2015, 1679
  • [42] Comparison of three time-series models for predicting campylobacteriosis risk
    Weisent, J.
    Seaver, W.
    Odoi, A.
    Rohrbach, B.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2010, 138 (06): : 898 - 906
  • [43] Monthly rainfall prediction model based on VMD-PSO-BiLSTM-case study: Handan City, China
    Guo, Shaolei
    Zhang, Yuehan
    Zhang, Xianqi
    Cheng, Wanhui
    Ren, He
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2025, 156 (02)
  • [44] Improving monthly precipitation prediction accuracy using machine learning models: a multi-view stacking learning technique
    El Hafyani, Mounia
    El Himdi, Khalid
    El Adlouni, Salah-Eddine
    FRONTIERS IN WATER, 2024, 6
  • [45] Predicting Pneumonia in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: Comparison of Five Prediction Scoring Models
    Tu, Tian Ming
    Phua, Sheena S. H.
    Acharyya, Sanchalika
    Ng, Wai May
    Oh, Daniel C. T.
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2017, 46 (06) : 237 - 244
  • [46] Comparison of three a-priori models in the prediction of serum lithium concentration
    Radhakrishnan, Rajiv
    Kanigere, Milanduth
    Menon, Jayakumar
    Calvin, Sam
    Srinivasan, Krishnamachari
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 44 (02): : 234 - 237
  • [47] A comparison of three liquid chromatography (LC) retention time prediction models
    McEachran, Andrew D.
    Mansouri, Kamel
    Newton, Seth R.
    Beverly, Brandiese E. J.
    Sobus, Jon R.
    Williams, Antony J.
    TALANTA, 2018, 182 : 371 - 379
  • [48] Comparison of three mathematical prediction models in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule
    Zhang, Xuan
    Yan, Hong-Hong
    Lin, Jun-Tao
    Wu, Ze-Hua
    Liu, Jia
    Cao, Xu-Wei
    Yang, Xue-Ning
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (06) : 647 - 652
  • [49] Comparison of three mathematical prediction models in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule
    Xuan Zhang
    Hong-Hong Yan
    Jun-Tao Lin
    Ze-Hua Wu
    Jia Liu
    Xu-Wei Cao
    Xue-Ning Yang
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2014, 26 (06) : 647 - 652
  • [50] In silico prediction of chromosome damage: comparison of three (Q)SAR models
    Morita, Takeshi
    Shigeta, Yoshiyuki
    Kawamura, Tomoko
    Fujita, Yurika
    Honda, Hiroshi
    Honma, Masamitsu
    MUTAGENESIS, 2019, 34 (01) : 91 - 100