Allopathic (MD) and Osteopathic (DO) Performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Initial Certifying Examinations

被引:6
|
作者
Sliwa, James A. [1 ]
Raddatz, Mikaela M. [2 ]
Kinney, Carolyn L. [2 ,3 ]
Clark, Gary [4 ,5 ]
Robinson, Lawrence [6 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Feinberg Sch Med, Shirley Ryan Abil Lab, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Amer Board Phys Med & Rehabil, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Metro Hlth Rehabil Inst Ohio, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Div Phys Med & Rehabil, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.12311
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background Osteopathic physicians (DOs) represent over 30% of residents in allopathic (MD) Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) training programs. However, some have questioned the quality of osteopathic medical school training and the graduates of osteopathic medical schools. The performance of osteopathic physicians in allopathic PM&R training programs has not been assessed. Objective To compare allopathic (MD) and osteopathic (DO) physician performance on American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) initial certifying examinations. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting Board-eligible PM&R physicians. Participants MDs and DOs who completed an allopathic ACGME-accredited PM&R residency training program. Methods MD and DO pass rates and mean scaled scores on the ABPMR initial certifying examinations were compared. MD versus DO degrees and training program 6 years aggregate board pass rates were independent variables. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure MD and DO pass rates and mean scaled scores on the ABPMR initial certifying examinations. Results Of the 2187 physicians who were first-time ABPMR initial certifying examination takers, there were 1596 MDs (73%) and 591 DOs (27%). No statistically significant difference was found in pass rates between MDs and DOs on Part I (94.9% vs. 93.9%, P = .35) or Part II (87.8% vs. 88%, P = .83) of the ABPMR certifying examination. Analysis of mean scaled scores demonstrated higher MD scores on both Part I ( 526, SD = 31, vs. 516, SD = 67, P = .002) and Part II ( 6.73, SD = .83 vs. 6.62, SD = .77, P = .005), significant only in programs with a 90%-100% pass rate. These differences, however, were of very small magnitude and likely not meaningful from a clinical or educational perspective. Conclusion This study did not find meaningful differences in performance on the ABPMR certifying examinations between MDs and DOs.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 903
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Can American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Part 2 Board Examination Scores be Predicted from Rotation Evaluations or Mock Oral Examinations?
    Engel, James
    Pai, Ajit B.
    Walker, William C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2014, 93 (12) : 1051 - 1056
  • [23] Do USMLE steps, and ITE score predict the American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Exam results?
    Rayamajhi, Supratik
    Dhakal, Prajwal
    Wang, Ling
    Rai, Manoj P.
    Shrotriya, Shiva
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [24] Do USMLE steps, and ITE score predict the American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Exam results?
    Supratik Rayamajhi
    Prajwal Dhakal
    Ling Wang
    Manoj P. Rai
    Shiva Shrotriya
    BMC Medical Education, 20
  • [25] A Comparative American Board of Surgery InTraining Examination (ABSITE) Performance Analysis Between International vs. Domestic Graduates and Doctor of Medicine (MD) vs. Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) Medical Degrees
    Rahimpour, Armein
    Morrison, Missy
    Denning, David A.
    Bown, Paul
    Ray, Peter
    Barry, Rahman
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [26] American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Diplomate Customization Choices on the Longitudinal Assessment for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation A First-Year Experience
    Driscoll, Sherilyn W.
    Raddatz, Mikaela M.
    Sabharwal, Sunil
    Francisco, Gerard E.
    Nguyen, Vu
    Kinney, Carolyn L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2022, 101 (07) : S21 - S25
  • [27] Improving Patient Safety and Quality in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Through Participation in the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Continuing Certification Program
    Sliwa, James A.
    Driscoll, Sherilyn Whately
    Robinson, Lawrence R.
    Walker, Michelle L.
    Garrison, Christopher J.
    Kinney, Carolyn L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2022, 101 (07) : S10 - S14
  • [28] PERFORMANCE OF WOMEN CANDIDATES ON THE "AMERICAN-BOARD-OF-INTERNAL-MEDICINE CERTIFYING EXAMINATION, 1973-1982
    NORCINI, JJ
    FLETCHER, SW
    QUIMBY, BB
    SHEA, JA
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1985, 102 (01) : 115 - 118
  • [29] Predicting performance on the American board of internal medicine certifying examination: The effects of resident preparation and other factors
    Grossman, RS
    Murata, GH
    Fincher, RME
    Norcini, JJ
    Kapsner, C
    Layne, RD
    Seelig, CB
    Gateley, A
    Arky, R
    Berkowitz, L
    Cain, P
    Carlisi, J
    Delgado, D
    Fisher, R
    Frye, E
    Grossman, R
    Haburchak, D
    Hardesty, D
    Kennedy, J
    Kountz, D
    Lavis, V
    Layne, R
    Layson, R
    Levine, M
    Maricic, M
    Murata, G
    Noah, M
    Potts, D
    Rucker, L
    Seelig, C
    Simons, R
    Walker, HK
    Yoder, E
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (10) : S74 - S76
  • [30] Do Milestone Ratings Predict Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Board Certification Examination Scores?
    Francisco, Gerard E.
    Yamazaki, Kenji
    Raddatz, Mikaela
    Sabharwal, Sunil
    Robinson, Lawrence
    Kinney, Carolyn
    Holmboe, Eric
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2021, 100 (2S) : S34 - S39