Bayesian belief networks to analyse trade-offs among ecosystem services at the regional scale

被引:66
|
作者
Landuyt, Dries [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Broekx, Steven [1 ]
Goethals, Peter L. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Flemish Inst Technol Res VITO, Unit Environm Modelling, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Lab Environm Toxicol & Aquat Ecol, Jozef Plateaustr 22, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Forest & Nat Lab, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267, B-9090 Melle Gontrode, Belgium
关键词
Joint probability distribution; Interaction; Correlation; Synergy; BBN; BIODIVERSITY; SYNERGIES; SUPPORT; MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; BUNDLES; CONSERVATION; PROVISION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.015
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Knowledge on trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services is crucial for the design of land use strategies that optimize ecosystem service delivery. Correlation coefficients, obtained through pairwise comparison of ecosystem service provision maps, have been put forward as suitable indicators to quantify these interactions. However, for more in depth analyses of trade-offs and synergies where driving forces of interactions need to be determined, more sophisticated methods are needed. Although Bayesian belief networks have been frequently mentioned as promising tools to investigate interactions among ecosystem services, up till now, no structured approaches to do so have been suggested. This paper presents a way to analyse trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services together with their driving forces. Joint probability distributions of ecosystem service pairs, which can be calculated by using Bayesian belief network models, are used to quantify interactions. The paper demonstrates the approach by quantifying trade-offs and synergies among several ecosystem services in Flanders, Belgium. Our analysis identifies two bundles of ecosystem services which react synergistically. Wood production and several regulating services on the one hand and food production and soil formation on the other hand. Trade-offs are identified among food production and most of the other services that were included into the analysis. In addition to these general findings, the analysis shows that the identified interactions may change depending on the considered environmental conditions, specified through soil type, land cover and land use. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 335
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Trade-offs Among Ecosystem Services After Vegetation Restoration in China's Loess Plateau
    Shi, Peng
    Li, Zhanbin
    Li, Peng
    Zhang, Yan
    Li, Binbin
    NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (03) : 2703 - 2713
  • [42] Trade-offs Among Ecosystem Services After Vegetation Restoration in China’s Loess Plateau
    Peng Shi
    Zhanbin Li
    Peng Li
    Yan Zhang
    Binbin Li
    Natural Resources Research, 2021, 30 : 2703 - 2713
  • [43] Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services for agriculture in the “sisal belt” of Kilosa, central Tanzania
    Puyang Li
    Guohua Hu
    B. L. Turner
    Yujia Zhang
    Landscape Ecology, 2023, 38 : 533 - 551
  • [44] Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services for agriculture in the "sisal belt" of Kilosa, central Tanzania
    Li, Puyang
    Hu, Guohua
    Turner II, B. L.
    Zhang, Yujia
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2023, 38 (02) : 533 - 551
  • [45] Time-Approximation Trade-Offs for Learning Bayesian Networks
    Kundu, Madhumita
    Parviainen, Pekka
    Saurabh, Saket
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROBABILISTIC GRAPHICAL MODELS, 2024, 246 : 486 - 497
  • [46] Making use of the ecosystem services concept in regional planning—trade-offs from reducing water erosion
    Susanne Frank
    Christine Fürst
    Anke Witt
    Lars Koschke
    Franz Makeschin
    Landscape Ecology, 2014, 29 : 1377 - 1391
  • [47] Anticipating and Managing Future Trade-offs and Complementarities between Ecosystem Services
    Reed, Mark S.
    Hubacek, Klaus
    Bonn, Aletta
    Burt, Tim P.
    Holden, Joseph
    Stringer, Lindsay C.
    Beharry-Borg, Nesha
    Buckmaster, Sarah
    Chapman, Dan
    Chapman, Pippa J.
    Clay, Gareth D.
    Cornell, Stephen J.
    Dougill, Andrew J.
    Evely, Anna C.
    Fraser, Evan D. G.
    Jin, Nanlin
    Irvine, Brian J.
    Kirkby, Mike J.
    Kunin, William E.
    Prell, Christina
    Quinn, Claire H.
    Slee, Bill
    Stagl, Sigrid
    Termansen, Mette
    Thorp, Simon
    Worrall, Fred
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [48] Analysis of ecosystem services trade-offs to design agroecosystems with perennial crops
    Rapidel, Bruno
    Ripoche, Aude
    Allinne, Clementine
    Metay, Aurelie
    Deheuvels, Olivier
    Lamanda, Nathalie
    Blazy, Jean-Marc
    Valdes-Gomez, Hector
    Gary, Christian
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (04) : 1373 - 1390
  • [49] Assessing Temporal Trade-Offs of Ecosystem Services by Production Possibility Frontiers
    Jiang, Wei
    Gao, Guangyao
    Wu, Xing
    Lv, Yihe
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [50] Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Montes, Carlos
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 37 : 220 - 228