The rural health care workforce implications of practice guideline implementation

被引:10
|
作者
Yawn, BP [1 ]
Casey, M [1 ]
Hebert, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Rural Hlth Res Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
workforce; guidelines; diabetes mellitus;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-199903000-00006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND. Rural health care workforce forecasting has not included adjustments for predictable changes in practice patterns, such as the introduction of practice guidelines. Purpose. To estimate the impact of a practice guideline for a single health condition on the needs of a rural health professional workforce. METHODS. The current care of a cohort of rural Medicare recipients with diabetes mellitus was compared with the care recommended by a diabetes practice guideline. The additional tests and visits that were needed to comply with the guideline were translated into additional hours of physician services and total physician full-time equivalents. Results. The implementation of a practice guideline for Medicare recipients with diabetes in rural Minnesota would require over 30,000 additional hours of primary care physician services and over 5,000 additional hours of eye care professionals' time per year. This additional need represents a 1.3% to 2.4% increase in the number of primary care physicians and a 1.0% to 6.6% increase in the number of eye-care clinicians in a state in which the rural medical provider to population ratios already meet some recommended workforce projections. Conclusions. The implementation of practice guidelines could result in an increased need for rural health care physicians or other providers. That increase, caused by guideline implementation, should be accounted for in future rural health care workforce predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 269
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Mental Health Workforce: Implications for Social Work Practice and Profession
    Polinsky, Elizabeth J.
    Bradsell, Jillian E. B.
    Keeley, Jared W.
    Cardin, Scott A.
    SOCIAL WORK IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 37 (06) : 560 - 580
  • [22] Implications of an Aging Rural Physician Workforce
    Skinner, Lucy
    Staiger, Douglas O.
    Auerbach, David I.
    Buerhaus, Peter I.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (04): : 299 - 301
  • [23] The mental health consumer movement: Implications for rural practice
    Bjorklund, RW
    Pippard, JL
    COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 1999, 35 (04) : 347 - 359
  • [24] Health Care Reform Implications for Health Care Administration Science and Practice
    Issel, L. Michele
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 35 (02) : 103 - 104
  • [25] The Mental Health Consumer Movement: Implications for Rural Practice
    Robert W. Bjorklund
    James L. Pippard
    Community Mental Health Journal, 1999, 35 : 347 - 359
  • [26] Barriers to Advance Care Planning Implementation in Health care: An Umbrella Review with Implications for Evidence-Based Practice
    Poveda-Moral, Silvia
    Falco-Pegueroles, Anna
    Ballesteros-Silva, Monica Patricia
    Bosch-Alcaraz, Alejandro
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2021, 18 (05) : 254 - 263
  • [27] Rural Eye Care Access, Workforce Challenges and Opportunities: Perspectives of the Eye Health Workforce in Western Australia
    Chen, Jingyi
    Bentley, Sharon A.
    Mckendrick, Allison M.
    Thompson, Sandra C.
    Turner, Angus W.
    Alam, Khyber
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2025, 33 (01)
  • [28] Demographic and Practice Trends of Rural Urologists in the U.S.: Implications for Workforce Policy
    Garg, Tullika
    Meeks, William D.
    Coward, R. Matthew
    Merrill, Suzanne B.
    Huang, William C.
    Burnett, Arthur L.
    UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 9 (05) : 481 - 490
  • [29] IMPLEMENTATION OF A MANAGED CARE PLAN FOR DUAL ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DIRECT CARE WORKFORCE IN MASSACHUSETTS
    Coyle, C. E.
    Gleason, H.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2015, 55 : 129 - 130
  • [30] The evolution of rural health networks: Implications for health care managers
    Gregg, W
    Moscovice, I
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) : 161 - 177