Use of vocalizations to estimate population size of roe deer

被引:11
|
作者
Reby, D [1 ]
Hewison, AJM [1 ]
Cargnelutti, B [1 ]
Angibault, JM [1 ]
Vincent, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Inst Rech Grands Mammiferes, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 1998年 / 62卷 / 04期
关键词
barking frequency; Capreolus capreolus; capture-mark-recapture; density estimators; population estimation; radiotracking; vocalization;
D O I
10.2307/3802000
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Estimating population abundance of large mammals generally requires substantial time and effort, and low-investment alternatives are needed. We present a novel application of a capture-mark-recapture (CMR) method, using vocalization frequency to estimate the size of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) populations. The technique involves walking along fixed transects to disturb all animals present on a study plot, potentially provoking a vocal response. Those animals heard to vocalize (whether observed or not) are then considered the total number of "marked" individuals in the population. The proportion of "marked" individuals in the population is estimated from the proportion of animals that vocalize in the subsample of individuals observed (the vocalization frequency). Population size is estimated by dividing the number of marked individuals by the vocalization frequency, correcting for bias, which is directly analogous to the Lincoln-Petersen (L-P) estimate for CMR. We used this method to estimate population size for roe deer inhabiting a 150-ha forest plot for 8 separate surveys, and we used the LP estimator to compare our estimates to mark-resight estimates. We estimated deer density as 23.45 +/- 7.80 deer/100 ha by CMR and 19.87 +/- 7.92 deer/100 ha by the vocalization frequency (VF) method ((x) over bar +/- SE). If the assumptions are met, this method provides estimates of absolute population size at low cost and with little material investment, because physical capture and marking of animals is not necessary. Further research is required to validate the assumption that visually observed animals have the same probability of vocalizing as those disturbed but not seen.
引用
收藏
页码:1342 / 1348
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DEMOGRAPHIC-PROCESSES IN A FOREST ROE DEER POPULATION
    FRUZINSKI, B
    LABUDZKI, L
    ACTA THERIOLOGICA, 1982, 27 (25-3): : 365 - 375
  • [22] Roe deer population structure in a highly fragmented landscape
    Breyne, Peter
    Mergeay, Joachim
    Casaer, Jim
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 60 (06) : 909 - 917
  • [23] Roe deer population structure in a highly fragmented landscape
    Peter Breyne
    Joachim Mergeay
    Jim Casaer
    European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2014, 60 : 909 - 917
  • [24] 'ROE DEER'
    MORT, G
    POETRY WALES, 1988, 23 (2-3): : 11 - 11
  • [25] 'ROE DEER'
    TOMLINSON, C
    HUDSON REVIEW, 1977, 30 (01): : 13 - 13
  • [26] ROE DEER
    不详
    NATURE, 1960, 186 (4729) : 936 - 936
  • [27] Unexpected population genetic structure of European roe deer in Poland: an invasion of the mtDNA genome from Siberian roe deer
    Matosiuk, Maciej
    Borkowska, Anetta
    Swislocka, Magdalena
    Mirski, Pawel
    Borowski, Zbigniew
    Krysiuk, Kamil
    Danilkin, Aleksey A.
    Zvychaynaya, Elena Y.
    Saveljev, Alexander P.
    Ratkiewicz, Miroslaw
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2014, 23 (10) : 2559 - 2572
  • [28] Effects of population density and female body mass on litter size in European roe deer at a continental scale
    Katarina Flajšman
    Tomasz Borowik
    Boštjan Pokorny
    Bogumiła Jędrzejewska
    Mammal Research, 2018, 63 : 91 - 98
  • [29] Effects of population density and female body mass on litter size in European roe deer at a continental scale
    Flajman, Katarina
    Borowik, Tomasz
    Pokorny, Botjan
    Jedrzejewska, Bogumila
    MAMMAL RESEARCH, 2018, 63 (01) : 91 - 98
  • [30] Use of catch-effort to estimate population size
    Lancia, RA
    Bishir, JW
    Conner, MC
    Rosenberry, CS
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1996, 24 (04): : 731 - 737