Landscape sustainability and the landscape ecology of institutions

被引:29
|
作者
Cumming, Graeme S. [1 ]
Epstein, Graham [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Australian Res Council, Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Resources & Sustainabil, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[3] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Polit Sci, Natl Ctr Integrated Coastal Res, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[4] Univ Cent Florida, Sustainable Coastal Syst Cluster, Natl Ctr Integrated Coastal Res, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Heterogeneity; Spatial resilience; Governance; Management emergence; Landscape change; Social-ecological system; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATING HUMAN; COLLECTIVE ACTION; SCALE MISMATCHES; PATH DEPENDENCE; PROTECTED AREAS; GOVERNANCE; FOREST;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-020-00989-8
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Landscape sustainability emerges from interactions between linked human and natural systems. Many of these interactions are mediated by institutions (e.g., rules, laws, customs, traditions), most of which are themselves spatially defined entities that both generate and respond to spatial variation in the landscape. However, the spatial dynamics of the interplay between institutions and landscape heterogeneity are poorly understood. Objective To define the landscape ecology of institutions as an emerging research field, providing a summary of key themes and frontiers. Methods We draw on existing theory in both landscape ecology and institutional analysis to explore the interface between landscape ecology and institutions in social-ecological systems. Results Three central themes in understanding landscape sustainability through an institutional lens include the role of landscape heterogeneity as a driver of institutions; the spatial properties of institutions as influences on ecological and socioeconomic processes; and the relationships between institutions and landscape resilience. Emerging frontiers for further research include understanding the roles of top-down vs bottom up processes (design vs. emergence); understanding landscapes as institutional filters; the role of landscapes in institutional development and change; and co-evolutionary dynamics between landscapes and institutions. We discuss each of these points in detail. Conclusions Spatially mediated feedbacks between landscape structure and institutions are poorly understood and critical for landscape sustainability. Further research in this area will depend heavily on generating data sets that describe the spatial properties of institutions and allow them to be analysed as landscape features.
引用
收藏
页码:2613 / 2628
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
    URBAN, DL
    ONEILL, RV
    SHUGART, HH
    BIOSCIENCE, 1987, 37 (02) : 119 - 127
  • [22] Landscape ecology
    Gerold, Gerhard
    ERDKUNDE, 2007, 61 (04) : 375 - 375
  • [23] AN ECOLOGY OF THE LANDSCAPE
    FORMAN, RTT
    BIOSCIENCE, 1983, 33 (09) : 535 - 535
  • [24] Landscape ecology meets landscape science
    Julian Helfenstein
    Lea Bauer
    Aline Clalüna
    Janine Bolliger
    Felix Kienast
    Landscape Ecology, 2014, 29 : 1109 - 1113
  • [25] Landscape ecology
    Barrett, G.W.
    Bohlen, P.J.
    NCASI Technical Bulletin, 1999, (781 I):
  • [26] ECOLOGY OF A LANDSCAPE
    SIMMONS, JN
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1994, 92 (12) : 40 - 40
  • [27] The landscape of ecology
    Pokallus, J. W.
    Campbell, G. M.
    Koch, B. J.
    Pauli, J. N.
    ECOSPHERE, 2011, 2 (02):
  • [28] Landscape and sustainability
    Sorvig, K
    LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, 2001, 91 (09): : 118 - 119
  • [29] Landscape and sustainability
    Dizdaroglu, Didem
    AUSTRALIAN PLANNER, 2009, 46 (02) : 66 - 66
  • [30] Remote sensing and landscape ecology: landscape patterns and landscape change
    Griffiths, GH
    Mather, PM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 21 (13-14) : 2537 - 2539