Genetic Architecture and the Evolution of Sex

被引:19
|
作者
Lohaus, Rolf [1 ]
Burch, Christina L. [2 ]
Azevedo, Ricardo B. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Biol & Biochem, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
canalization; directional epistasis; gene regulatory networks; recombination load; robustness; DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS; BENEFICIAL MUTATIONS; FINITE POPULATIONS; RNA VIRUS; RECOMBINATION; SELECTION; EPISTASIS; FITNESS; REPRODUCTION; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1093/jhered/esq013
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Theoretical investigations of the advantages of sex have tended to treat the genetic architecture of organisms as static and have not considered that genetic architecture might coevolve with reproductive mode. As a result, some potential advantages of sex may have been missed. Using a gene network model, we recently showed that recombination imposes selection for robustness to mutation and that negative epistasis can evolve as a by-product of this selection. These results motivated a detailed exploration of the mutational deterministic hypothesis, a hypothesis in which the advantage of sex depends critically on epistasis. We found that sexual populations do evolve higher mean fitness and lower genetic load than asexual populations at equilibrium, and, under moderate stabilizing selection and large population size, these equilibrium sexual populations resist invasion by asexuals. However, we found no evidence that these long-and short-term advantages to sex were explained by the negative epistasis that evolved in our experiments. The long-term advantage of sex was that sexual populations evolved a lower deleterious mutation rate, but this property was not sufficient to account for the ability of sexual populations to resist invasion by asexuals. The ability to resist asexual invasion was acquired simultaneously with an increase in recombinational robustness that minimized the cost of sex. These observations provide the first direct evidence that sexual reproduction does indeed select for conditions that favor its own maintenance. Furthermore, our results highlight the importance of considering a dynamic view of the genetic architecture to understand the evolution of sex and recombination.
引用
收藏
页码:S142 / S157
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genetic conflict and sex chromosome evolution
    Meiklejohn, Colin D.
    Tao, Yun
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2010, 25 (04) : 215 - 223
  • [22] GENETIC SEX DETERMINATION MECHANISMS AND EVOLUTION
    HODGKIN, J
    BIOESSAYS, 1992, 14 (04) : 253 - 261
  • [23] Genetic architecture and sex-specific selection govern modular, male-biased evolution of doublesex
    Baral, Saurav
    Arumugam, Gandhimathi
    Deshmukh, Riddhi
    Kunte, Krushnamegh
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2019, 5 (05)
  • [24] Pleiotropy, cooperation, and the social evolution of genetic architecture
    dos Santos, Miguel
    Ghoul, Melanie
    West, Stuart A.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2018, 16 (10):
  • [25] Evolution of genetic architecture under directional selection
    Hansen, Thomas F.
    Alvarez-Castro, Jose M.
    Carter, Ashley J. R.
    Hermisson, Joachim
    Wagner, Guenter P.
    EVOLUTION, 2006, 60 (08) : 1523 - 1536
  • [26] Theoretical Approaches to the Evolution of Development and Genetic Architecture
    Rice, Sean H.
    YEAR IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY 2008, 2008, 1133 : 67 - 86
  • [27] The genetic architecture and evolution of the human skeletal form
    Kun, Eucharist
    Javan, Emily M.
    Smith, Olivia
    Gulamali, Faris
    de la Fuente, Javier
    Flynn, Brianna I.
    Vajrala, Kushal
    Trutner, Zoe
    Jayakumar, Prakash
    Tucker-Drob, Elliot M.
    Sohail, Mashaal
    Singh, Tarjinder
    Narasimhan, Vagheesh M.
    SCIENCE, 2023, 381 (6655) : 283 - +
  • [28] The genetic architecture of the evolution of pigmentation patterns in Drosophila
    Carrol, SB
    Kopp, A
    Wittkopp, P
    Williams, B
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 2001, 41 (06): : 1408 - 1408
  • [29] Genetic Architecture Promotes the Evolution and Maintenance of Cooperation
    Frenoy, Antoine
    Taddei, Francois
    Misevic, Dusan
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 9 (11)
  • [30] Sex Differences in the Genetic Architecture of Alzheimer’s Disease
    Logan Dumitrescu
    Elizabeth Rose Mayeda
    Kavya Sharman
    Annah M. Moore
    Timothy J. Hohman
    Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 2019, 7 : 13 - 21