Chemical analyses of shale gas and conventional natural gas

被引:12
|
作者
Demirbas, Ayhan [1 ,2 ]
Cek, Nurettin [3 ]
Acar, Sukru [4 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Engn, POB 80206, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] Sila Sci, Dept Renewable Energy, Trabzon, Turkey
[3] Firat Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Fac Engn, Elazig, Turkey
[4] Selcuk Univ, Inst Sci, Konya, Turkey
关键词
chemical analysis; natural gas; sedimentary rock; shale gas; unconventional reservoir; ENERGY; METHANE; FUEL; SULFUR; US;
D O I
10.1080/10916466.2018.1504070
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Shale gas is essentially non-traditional natural gas (NG). Shale gas can be considered an unusual alternative energy source. Shale gas production is a method of obtaining the NG trapped between deep underground rocks. Shale gas production is not economical, except for horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing methods. Advanced analysis of shale gaseous samples can be done using gas chromatography, mass spectrometry and other modern testing methods. The Orsat apparatus includes three absorption pipettes containing chemical solutions that absorb gases. Absorbents are a 33% by weight aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide (KOH) for carbon dioxide (CO2), alkali pyrogallol for oxygen (O-2) and ammoniacal cuprous for carbon monoxide (CO) measurement. Oxygen is absorbed in alkaline pyrogallol or in a chromous solution. Shale gas can be analyzed best gas chromatographically. The capillary column can be separated from all the hydrocarbons and their isomers by alumina, which is used as a stationary phase in the gas chromatographic column, because alumina is highly selective for hydrocarbons. Silica is a specific adsorbent that exhibits greater applicability for hydrocarbons. The chemical contents of shale gas are similar to those of the conventional NG. The processing, transfer and storage and distribution of shale gas are assumed to be similar to the conventional NG.
引用
收藏
页码:1690 / 1695
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chemical conversion of natural gas
    Chaumette, P
    REVUE DE L INSTITUT FRANCAIS DU PETROLE, 1996, 51 (05): : 711 - 727
  • [32] NATURAL GAS AS A CHEMICAL FEEDSTOCK
    COATSWOR.K
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS AND THE CHEMICAL ENGINEER, 1968, 46 (06): : C242 - &
  • [33] Fossil energy: From conventional oil and gas to the shale revolution
    Marchionna, Mario
    LECTURE NOTES - JOINT EPS-SIF INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ON ENERGY 2017 - COURSE 4: ADVANCES IN BASIC ENERGY ISSUES, 2018, 189
  • [34] Numerical Investigation of Combined Production of Natural Gas Hydrate and Conventional Gas
    Xu, Hongzhi
    Wang, Jian
    Li, Shuxia
    Zhao, Fengrui
    Wang, Chengwen
    Guo, Yang
    FDMP-FLUID DYNAMICS & MATERIALS PROCESSING, 2024, 20 (03): : 505 - 523
  • [35] Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Transportation Fuels from Shale Gas-Derived Natural Gas Liquids
    Chen, Qining
    Dunn, Jennifer B.
    Allen, David T.
    26TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE), 2019, 80 : 346 - 351
  • [36] Modeling the Relative GHG Emissions of Conventional and Shale Gas Production
    Stephenson, Trevor
    Valle, Jose Eduardo
    Riera-Palou, Xavier
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (24) : 10757 - 10764
  • [37] Ozone Impacts of Natural Gas Development in the Haynesville Shale
    Kemball-Cook, Susan
    Bar-Ilan, Amnon
    Grant, John
    Parker, Lynsey
    Jung, Jaegun
    Santamaria, Wilson
    Mathews, Jim
    Yarwood, Greg
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (24) : 9357 - 9363
  • [38] Unconventional: The development of natural gas from the marcellus shale
    Soeder, Daniel J., 1600, Geological Society of America (527):
  • [39] Risk Perceptions of Natural Gas Development in the Marcellus Shale
    Brasier, Kathryn J.
    McLaughlin, Diane K.
    Rhubart, Danielle
    Stedman, Richard C.
    Filteau, Matthew R.
    Jacquet, Jeffrey
    ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE, 2013, 15 (02) : 108 - 122
  • [40] Natural gas from shale formation: A research profile
    Wang, Qiang
    Li, Rongrong
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 57 : 1 - 6