Determining optimal values of performance indicators in different scenarios of on-farm water management*

被引:1
|
作者
Moghimi, Mohammad Mehdi [1 ]
Niknejad, Fatemeh [1 ]
Mahmoudi, Mohammad Reza [2 ]
Moghaddam, Atefeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Fasa Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Water Sci & Engn, Fasa, Iran
[2] Fasa Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Stat, Fasa, Iran
关键词
deficit irrigation scheduling; net income; response surface methodology; water productivity; water reduction fraction; DEFICIT IRRIGATION; ECONOMIC RETURNS; PRODUCTIVITY; SURFACE; OPTIMIZATION; IMPACTS; MAIZE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/ird.2638
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In order to save water in the agricultural sector, the efficient use of irrigation water should be considered seriously by using appropriate performance indicators. In this research, the impact of on-farm water management factors (irrigation application efficiency [E-a] and water reduction fraction [WRF]) on the performance indicators net income (NI) and farm irrigation water productivity (WP) were assessed in different deficit irrigation scheduling scenarios (consists of deliberately applying irrigation depths smaller than those required), using response surface methodology. Pareto charts of the standardized effects showed that the factors of WRF and E-a were the most important predictors influencing NI and WP, respectively. Considering multiple response predictions for simultaneous optimization of NI and WP, the maximum optimal values of NI obtained were 62.1 million rials (WP = 1.12, WRF = 0.33), 113.2 (WP = 0.76, WRF = 0.02), 32.2 (WP = 0.8, WRF = 0.19), 65.5 (WP = 0.66, WRF = 0.17), and 84.0 (WP = 0.34, WRF = 0.48) for winter wheat, rapeseed, barley, maize, and cotton, respectively. These values were obtained in E-a = 90%, method 2 of deficit irrigation scheduling and sprinkler irrigation system. Using different deficit irrigation scheduling scenarios and irrigation systems resulted in on-farm water management packages for different conditions of water availability.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 192
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ANALYSIS OF ON-FARM WATER MANAGEMENT FOR IRRIGATED RICE CULTIVATION.
    Buhiran, Kassim
    Suzuki, Mitsukata
    Satoh, Masayoshi
    Yusof, Embi
    Journal of irrigation engineering and rural planning, 1987, (11) : 24 - 37
  • [22] Water balance simulation and economic analysis for optimal size of on-farm reservoir
    Panigrahi, B
    Panda, SN
    Agrawal, A
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2005, 19 (03) : 233 - 250
  • [23] Improving on-farm water management through an irrigation scheduling service
    A. Montoro
    P. López-Fuster
    E. Fereres
    Irrigation Science, 2011, 29 : 311 - 319
  • [24] On-farm irrigation water management in India: Challenges and research gaps*
    Gupta, Ajita
    Singh, Ranjay kumar
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Sawant, Chetankumar Prakash
    Gaikwad, Bhaskar Bharat
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2022, 71 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [25] Evaluation of on-farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age
    Mills, Kayla M.
    Schinckel, Allan P.
    Stevens, Jebadiah G.
    Casey, Theresa M.
    Stewart, Kara R.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 4 (04) : 1 - 8
  • [26] Water Balance Simulation and Economic Analysis for Optimal Size of On-Farm Reservoir
    B. Panigrahi
    Sudhindra Nath Panda
    A. Agrawal
    Water Resources Management, 2005, 19 : 233 - 250
  • [27] Improving on-farm water management through an irrigation scheduling service
    Montoro, A.
    Lopez-Fuster, P.
    Fereres, E.
    IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2011, 29 (04) : 311 - 319
  • [28] The effect of stochastic irrigation demands and surface water supplies on on-farm water management
    Willis, DB
    Whittlesey, NK
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 23 (01) : 206 - 224
  • [29] Evaluation of different management scenarios for trout farm effluents using dynamic water quality modeling
    Muhammetoglu, Ayse
    Kocer, Mehmet Ali Turan
    Durmaz, Sercan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (04)
  • [30] Evaluation of different management scenarios for trout farm effluents using dynamic water quality modeling
    Ayse Muhammetoglu
    Mehmet Ali Turan Kocer
    Sercan Durmaz
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194