Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model

被引:54
|
作者
Hein, Simon [1 ]
Petzold, Ralf [1 ]
Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo [1 ]
Mueller, Philippe-Fabian [1 ]
Schoenthaler, Martin [1 ]
Miernik, Arkadiusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Med Ctr, Div Urotechnol,Dept Urol, Hugstetter Str 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Nephrolithiasis; Urolithiasis; Ho; YAG laser lithotripsy; Ureteroscopy; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Thermal effect; UPPER URINARY-TRACT; HEAT-GENERATION; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-019-02808-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the thermal effect of high-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy in flexible/semirigid ureteroscopy (fURS/sURS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in a standardized ex vivo porcine kidney model with real-time temperature assessment. Methods The experimental setup consisted of three models designed to evaluate the thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in fURS, sURS and PNL, respectively. In all setups, a postmortem porcine kidney was placed in a 37 degrees C water bath. Three thermocouples were inserted into the renal parenchyma while a flexible thermocouple was placed 3-4 mm proximal to the laser fiber to measure temperature variations in the collecting system. The thermal impact was evaluated in relation to laser power between 5 and 100 W and various irrigation rates (37 degrees C, 0-100 ml/min). Results In all three experimental setups, sufficient irrigation was required to prevent potentially damaging temperatures into the renal pelvis and parenchyma. Even 5 W in fURS can lead to a potentially harming temperature rise if insufficient irrigation is applied. Particularly, high-power settings >= 30 W carry an elevated risk for critical temperature rises. The results allow the definition of a specific irrigation threshold for any power setting to prevent critical temperatures in the present study design. Conclusions Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy bears the risk of thermal damages to the urinary tract even at low-power settings if inadequate irrigation is applied. Sufficient irrigation is mandatory to perform safe Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. Based on the results, we developed a formula calculating the approximate Delta T for irrigation rates >= 30 ml/min: Delta T = 15 K x (power [W]/irrigation [ml/min]).
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 760
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model
    Simon Hein
    Ralf Petzold
    Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
    Philippe-Fabian Müller
    Martin Schoenthaler
    Arkadiusz Miernik
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 753 - 760
  • [2] Intrarenal pressures during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a porcine kidney model
    Yap, Lee Chien
    Hogan, Donnacha
    Patterson, Kenneth
    McGuinness, Gerard
    O'Connor, Charles
    Sharfi, Ashraf
    Hennessey, Derek Barry
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 56 (03) : 251 - 254
  • [3] Monitoring Intrarenal temperature changes during Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery: a novel pilot study
    Kose, Ertugrul
    Bostanci, Yakup
    Gulsen, Murat
    Sahin, Fevzi
    Kalayci, Onur
    Ozden, Ender
    Yakupoglu, Yarkin Kamil
    Sarikaya, Saban
    UROLITHIASIS, 2024, 52 (01)
  • [4] Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy
    Kruck, Stephan
    Anastasiadis, Aristoteles G.
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Walcher, Ute
    Abdelhafez, Mohamed F.
    Nicklas, Andre P.
    Hoelzle, Lillian
    Schilling, David
    Bedke, Jens
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Nagele, Udo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (06) : 1555 - 1561
  • [5] Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy
    Stephan Kruck
    Aristoteles G. Anastasiadis
    Thomas R. W. Herrmann
    Ute Walcher
    Mohamed F. Abdelhafez
    André P. Nicklas
    Lillian Hölzle
    David Schilling
    Jens Bedke
    Arnulf Stenzl
    Udo Nagele
    World Journal of Urology, 2013, 31 : 1555 - 1561
  • [6] Intrarenal pressures during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy: A porcine kidney model
    Hogan, D.
    Yap, L. C.
    Patterson, K.
    Mc Guinness, G.
    O'Connor, C.
    Sharfi, A.
    Hennessey, D. B.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S1745 - S1746
  • [7] Renal Outcomes after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones
    Chang, Chun Feng
    Hsu, Shun Neng
    Chung, Chi Hsiang
    Ni, Ying Jui
    Kao, Chien Chang
    Wu, Seng Tang
    Yu, Dah Shyong
    Chien, Wu Chien
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 : 299 - 299
  • [8] In vivo Porcine Model for Practicing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
    Tunc, Lutfi
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Unsal, Ali
    Oguz, Ural
    Diri, Akif
    Gozen, Ali Serdar
    Bedir, Selahattin
    Ozgok, Yasar
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 92 (01) : 64 - 67
  • [9] Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Kidney Stones
    Schmidt, S.
    Miernik, A.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (09): : 1283 - 1286
  • [10] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones
    Srisubat, Attasit
    Potisat, Somkiat
    Lojanapiwat, Bannakij
    Setthawong, Vasun
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (11):