Prioritising ecosystem services in Chinese rural and urban communities

被引:24
|
作者
Pan, Yuan [1 ]
Marshall, Stuart [2 ]
Maltby, Lorraine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Western Bank, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Unilever Colworth, Safety & Environm Assurance Ctr, Sharnbrook, Beds, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Ecosystem services; China; Community interviews; Ecosystem valuation; WATER CONTACT-BEHAVIOR; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; BIODIVERSITY; RIVER; QUALITY; SCHISTOSOMIASIS; SHANGHAI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.011
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Identifying ecosystem services that are important to society can help decision-makers to prioritize specific services for protection. However, ecosystem services may be valued differently by different sections of society. This study sets out an approach for assessing the use and prioritization of freshwater ecosystem services by people in rural and urban areas in China. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 30 rural and 30 urban respondents in the same region of Shandong province. Respondents were asked about how they used their local river and to prioritize ecosystem services provided by the river. In addition, respondents were asked to state whether they would be prepared to pay to protect their local river. The rural community used more ecosystem services and prioritized them more highly than the urban community; probably because they interacted with them more frequently. The results of this study raise the question of whether there should be different ecosystem services protection goals for rural and urban regions, as well as highlighting potential trade-offs between ecosystem services prioritized by different sections of society (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: A cross-analysis of European cities
    Larondelle, Neele
    Haase, Dagmar
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 29 : 179 - 190
  • [32] URBAN-RURAL ECOSYSTEM MODEL
    MCLEOD, J
    SIMULATION, 1973, 20 (01) : 33 - 35
  • [33] What happens to people receiving inpatient psychiatric services in mixed rural and urban communities?
    Yeaman, C
    Gambach, J
    Bach, B
    Manker, J
    Diwan, S
    Corrigan, P
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (03) : 247 - 253
  • [34] Integrating Services for Older People in Aging Communities in The Netherlands: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Approaches
    Pijpers, Roos
    de Kam, George
    Dorland, Laura
    JOURNAL OF HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY, 2016, 30 (04) : 430 - 449
  • [35] What Happens to People Receiving Inpatient Psychiatric Services in Mixed Rural and Urban Communities?
    Cathy Yeaman
    Janice Gambach
    Barbara Bach
    Jackie Manker
    Sarah Diwan
    Patrick Corrigan
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2003, 30 : 247 - 253
  • [36] ECOSYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY, CLIMATE CHANGE, AND RURAL COMMUNITIES
    Meadows, P. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES-JAPS, 2011, 21 : 317 - 332
  • [37] The ecosystem services of urban soils: A review
    O'Riordan, Roisin
    Davies, Jess
    Stevens, Carly
    Quinton, John N.
    Boyko, Christopher
    GEODERMA, 2021, 395
  • [38] FUNCTIONS OF URBAN GREENSPACE AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
    Szumacher, Iwona
    MISCELLANEA GEOGRAPHICA, 2011, 15 : 123 - 129
  • [39] Ecosystem Services in Agricultural and Urban Landscapes
    Daigneault, Adam
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2015, 59 (01) : 154 - 156
  • [40] Ecosystem services in urban water investment
    Kandulu, John M.
    Connor, Jeffery D.
    MacDonald, Darla Hatton
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 145 : 43 - 53