A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives

被引:14
|
作者
Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio [1 ,2 ]
Orlando, Francesco [1 ,3 ]
Ottobelli, Marco [1 ]
Fiori, Davide [1 ]
Garagiola, Umberto [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Odontoiatr & Protes Civitali SRL, Milan, Italy
[2] Vita Salute San Raffaele Univ Milan, Dept Dent, Milan, Italy
[3] Vita Salute Univ IRCCS San Raffaele, Dent Sch, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Surg & Dent Sci, Milan, Italy
关键词
Alveolar ridge preservation; Alveolar socket; Bone xenograft; Anorganic bone; Collagen-preserving bone; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; BOVINE-DERIVED XENOGRAFT; HUMAN OSTEOCLAST FORMATION; TOOTH EXTRACTION; SINUS AUGMENTATION; SOCKET PRESERVATION; POST-EXTRACTION; EQUINE BONE; HISTOLOGICAL-EVALUATION; BIO-OSS(R) COLLAGEN;
D O I
10.1186/s40902-022-00349-3
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
After tooth extraction, dimensional changes affect the alveolar socket, leading to loss in alveolar bone height and width. Histological modifications also occur, with initial formation of a blood clot that is replaced with granulation tissue and subsequently with a provisional connective tissue matrix. Spontaneous healing ends with socket filling with woven bone, which is gradually replaced with lamellar bone and bone marrow. Adequate alveolar ridge dimensions and bone quality are required to assure optimal stability and osseointegration following dental implant placement. When a tooth is extracted, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures are an effective method to prevent collapse of the post-extraction socket. Heterologous bone is widely chosen by clinicians for ARP, and anorganic bone xenografts (ABXs) made bioinert by heat treatment represents the most used biomaterial in clinical applications. Collagen-preserving bone xenografts (CBXs) made of porcine or equine bone are fabricated by less invasive chemical or enzymatic treatments to remove xenogenic antigens, and these are also effective in preserving post-extraction sites. Clinical differences between anorganic bone substitutes and collagen-preserving materials are not well documented in the literature but understanding these differences could clarify how processing protocols influence biomaterial behavior in situ. This systematic review of the literature compares the dimensional changes and histological features of ABXs versus CBXs in ridge preservation procedures to promote awareness of different bone xenograft efficacies in stimulating the healing of post-extraction sockets.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial of Bone Healing After Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Xenografts and Allografts Versus Plasma Rich in Growth Factors
    Stumbras, Arturas
    Januzis, Gintaras
    Gervickas, Albinas
    Kubilius, Ricardas
    Juodzbalys, Gintaras
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2020, 46 (05) : 515 - 525
  • [32] Clinical performance of alveolar ridge augmentation with xenogeneic bone block grafts versus autogenous bone block grafts. A systematic review
    Sanchez-Labrador, Luis
    Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
    Perez-Gonzalez, Fabian
    Saez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel
    Brinkmann, Jorge Cortes-Breton
    Martinez, Juan Lopez-Quiles
    Martinez-Gonzalez, Jose Maria
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 122 (03) : 293 - 302
  • [33] Alveolar Ridge Preservation with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral and Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix: A 12-Month Clinical and Histomorphometric Case Series
    Vaia, Emanuele
    Nicolo, Michele
    Vaia, Enzo
    Iorio-Siciliano, Vincenzo
    Isola, Gaetano
    Ramaglia, Luca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 41 (03) : 423 - +
  • [34] Associations among Primary Stability, Histomorphometric Findings, and Bone Density: A Prospective Randomized Study after Alveolar Ridge Preservation with a Collagen Cone
    Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
    Goetz, Werner
    Dreyhaupt, Jens
    Rudolph, Heike
    Luthardt, Ralph G.
    Edelmann, Cornelia
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2020, 8 (04)
  • [35] Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Study of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Combining Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft With Two Xenogeneic Collagen Matrices
    Parashis, Andreas O.
    Hawley, Charles E.
    Stark, Paul C.
    Ganguly, Rumpa
    Hanley, James B.
    Steffensen, Bjorn
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 87 (04) : 416 - 425
  • [36] Intraoral onlay block bone grafts versus cortical tenting technique on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review
    Aloy-Prosper, Amparo
    Carramolino-Cuellar, Esther
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Soto-Penaloza, David
    Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2022, 27 (02): : E181 - E190
  • [37] Histologic Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Covered with Xenogenic Collagen Matrix
    Ramaglia, Luca
    Saviano, Raffaele
    Matarese, Giovanni
    Cassandro, Francesco
    Williams, Ray C.
    Isola, Gaetano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 38 (05) : 737 - +
  • [38] Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Sapata, Vitor M.
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Wu, Hui
    Hu, Xiu-lian
    Lin, Ye
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (05) : 522 - 529
  • [39] The clinical effect of bone perforations in periodontal regeneration and alveolar socket preservation: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Pesce, Paolo
    Canullo, Luigi
    Testori, Tiziano
    Mastroianni, Alessandro
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    Menini, Maria
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [40] Can stem cells enhance bone formation in the human edentulous alveolar ridge? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lucyene Miguita
    Andrea Mantesso
    Claudio Mendes Pannuti
    Maria Cristina Zindel Deboni
    Cell and Tissue Banking, 2017, 18 : 217 - 228