Poultry Waste Valorization via Pyrolysis Technologies: Economic and Environmental Life Cycle Optimization for Sustainable Bioenergy Systems

被引:37
|
作者
Zhao, Ning [3 ]
Lehmann, Johannes [4 ,5 ]
You, Fengqi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Atkinson Ctr Sustainable Future, Syst Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Robert Frederick Smith Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Syst Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Sch Integrated Plant Sci, Soil & Crop Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Atkinson Ctr Sustainable Future, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
waste-to-energy; life cycle optimization; biofuel; sustainable supply chain; pyrolysis; SUPPLY CHAIN OPTIMIZATION; TECHNOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT; HYDROCARBON BIOREFINERY; CHEMICALS PRODUCTION; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; ENERGY; DESIGN; LITTER; MODEL; BIOCHAR;
D O I
10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00704
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This article addresses the life cycle optimization (LCO) of the poultry litter supply chain considering pyrolysis technologies that aim to sustainably convert poultry waste into biofuel and biochar. A multiobjective optimization framework integrated with a life cycle analysis methodology is developed. The economic objective is to maximize annualized profit per functional unit, and the environmental objective is to minimize the annual CO2-equivalent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per functional unit. The formulated multiobjective mixed-integer fractional programming problems are solved using an E-constraint method and parametric algorithm. To illustrate the applicability of the proposed framework, a case study on the State of Georgia is presented. The Pareto-optimal solutions illustrate a clear trade-off between the unit annualized profit and the unit annual CO2-eq GHG emission. The most economically profitable solution has an annualized profit of $91 /ton poultry litter dry matter (DM) and an annual sequestration of 0.04 kg CO2-eq/ton DM. The most environmentally sustainable solution has a profit of -$1.02/ton DM and annual emissions of -511 kg CO2-eq/ton DM. Through spatial analysis, a clear correlation between pyrolysis facility locations and poultry litter production amount is revealed. Sensitivity analyses reveal biochar price and storage periods of unpyrolyzed poultry manure to be the greatest factors that influence the economics and environmental objectives, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:4633 / 4646
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sustainable cities and Brazilian inventors: Environmental technologies on life cycle assessment in patent databases
    Grunevald, Isabel
    Kipper, Liane Mahlmann
    Moraes, Jorge Andre Ribas
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 8 (02)
  • [42] Environmental life cycle risk modeling of nuclear waste recycling systems
    Choi, Sungyeol
    Nam, Hyo On
    Ko, Won Il
    ENERGY, 2016, 112 : 836 - 851
  • [43] Environmental economic profiles of expressway construction via life cycle assessment
    Huang, Yimiao
    Zhao, Xiaokuan
    Zhang, Ruochen
    Xie, Panpan
    Xue, Guixiang
    Ma, Guowei
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 104
  • [44] LIFE CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE TO ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES: A REVIEW STUDY
    Ebrahimzadeh Sarvestani M.
    Di Maria F.
    Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 2023, 49 (03): : 201 - 214
  • [45] Tri-generation for sustainable poultry litter valorization: Process design, simulation, optimization, and sustainability assessment for waste-to-wealth
    Ayub, Yousaf
    Zhou, Jianzhao
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Shen, Weifeng
    He, Chang
    Toniolo, Sara
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 418
  • [46] Multi-objective optimization to improve energy, economic and, environmental life cycle assessment in waste-to-energy plant
    Mayanti, Bening
    Songok, Joel
    Helo, Petri
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 127 : 147 - 157
  • [47] Advancing Sustainable Energy: Environmental and Economic Assessment of Plastic Waste Gasification for Syngas and Electricity Generation Using Life Cycle Modeling
    Javed, Muhammad Hassan
    Ahmad, Anees
    Rehan, Mohammad
    Musharavati, Farayi
    Nizami, Abdul-Sattar
    Khan, Mohammad Ilyas
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [48] The environmental impacts of commercial poultry production systems using life cycle assessment: a review
    Kheiralipour, Kamran
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Karimi, Mahmoud
    Nadimi, Mohammad
    Paliwal, Jitendra
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2024, 80 (01) : 33 - 54
  • [49] Life cycle evaluation and economic considerations of the pyrolysis-gasification of municipal solid waste in Singapore
    Khoo, H. H.
    Tan, R. B. H.
    Salim, S.
    Wu, Y. M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND INVESTMENT ASSESSMENT, 2006, 98 : 43 - +
  • [50] Sustainable Solid Waste Management Using Life Cycle Modeling for Environmental Impact Assessment
    Horttanainen, Mika
    Liikanen, Miia
    Havukainen, Jouni
    Deviatkin, Ivan
    INFORMATION MODELLING AND KNOWLEDGE BASES XXXI, 2020, 321 : 16 - 33