Contemporary Diagnostic Imaging Modalities for the Staging and Surveillance of Melanoma Patients: a Meta-analysis

被引:226
|
作者
Xing, Yan
Bronstein, Yulia [2 ]
Ross, Merrick I.
Askew, Robert L.
Lee, Jeffrey E.
Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
Royal, Richard
Cormier, Janice N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Unit 444, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; SENTINEL-NODE BIOPSY; CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT-MELANOMA; HIGH-RISK MELANOMA; NEEDLE-ASPIRATION-CYTOLOGY; FOLLOW-UP RECOMMENDATIONS; LYMPH-NODE; METASTATIC MELANOMA; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; INITIAL EVALUATION;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djq455
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Meta-analyses were performed to examine the utility of ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and a combination of both (PET-CT) for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients. Method Patient-level data from 74 studies containing 10 528 patients (between January 1, 1990, and June, 30, 2009) were used to derive characteristics of the diagnostic tests used. Meta-analyses were conducted by use of Bayesian bivariate binomial models to estimate sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic odds ratios [ie, true-positive results/false-negative results)/(false-positive results/true-negative results)] and their 95% credible intervals (CrIs) and positive predictive values were used as indicators of test performance. Results Among the four imaging methods examined for the staging of regional lymph nodes, ultrasonography had the highest sensitivity (60%, 95% CrI = 33% to 83%), specificity (97%, 95% CrI = 88% to 99%), and diagnostic odds ratio (42, 95% CrI = 8.08 to 249.8). For staging of distant metastases, PET-CT had the highest sensitivity (80%, 95% CrI = 53% to 93%), specificity (87%, 95% CrI = 54% to 97%), and diagnostic odds ratio (25, 95% CrI = 3.58 to 198.7). Similar trends were observed for melanoma surveillance of lymph node involvement, with ultrasonography having the highest sensitivity (96%, 95% CrI = 85% to 99%), specificity (99%, 95% CrI = 95% to 100%), and diagnostic odds ratio (1675, 95% CrI = 226.6 to 15,920). For distant metastases, PET-CT had the highest sensitivity (86%, 95% CrI = 76% to 93%), specificity (91%, 95% CrI = 79% to 97%), and diagnostic odds ratio (67, 95% CrI = 20.42 to 229.7). Positive predictive values were likewise highest for ultrasonography in lymph node staging and for PET-CT in detecting distant metastases. Conclusion Among the compared modalities, ultrasonography was superior for detecting lymph node metastases, and PET-CT was superior for the detection of distant metastases in both the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 142
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic imaging modalities for the surveillance of melanoma patients: A meta-analysis.
    Xing, Y.
    Bronstein, Y.
    Ross, M. I.
    Askew, R. L.
    Lee, J. E.
    Gershenwald, J. E.
    Royal, R.
    Cormier, J. N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [2] Review of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities for the Surveillance of Melanoma Patients
    Xing, Yan
    Cromwell, Kate D.
    Cormier, Janice N.
    DERMATOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2012, 2012
  • [3] TFCC Injuries: Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities
    Treiser, Matthew D.
    Crawford, Kayva
    Iorio, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF WRIST SURGERY, 2018, 7 (03) : 267 - 272
  • [4] Diagnostic performance of noninvasive imaging modalities for localization of insulinoma: A meta-analysis
    Yang, Yi
    Shi, Jian
    Zhu, Jianbing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 145
  • [5] Diagnostic Value of Seven Different Imaging Modalities for Patients with Neuroblastic Tumors: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Yu
    Xu, Yanfeng
    Kan, Ying
    Wang, Wei
    Yang, Jigang
    CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 2021
  • [6] Accuracy of MR imaging for staging prostate cancer: A diagnostic meta-analysis
    Langlotz, CP
    Sonnad, SS
    Schwartz, JS
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 677 - 677
  • [7] Contemporary imaging modalities for the surveillance of patients with renal cell carcinoma
    Tollefson M.K.
    Takahashi N.
    Leibovich B.C.
    Current Urology Reports, 2007, 8 (1) : 38 - 43
  • [8] Diagnostic accuracy of functional imaging modalities for chondrosarcoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jo, I
    Gould, D.
    Schlicht, S.
    Taubman, K.
    Choong, P.
    JOURNAL OF BONE ONCOLOGY, 2019, 19
  • [9] Diagnostic performance of different imaging modalities for splenic malignancies: A comparative meta-analysis
    Valizadeh, Parya
    Jannatdoust, Payam
    Tahamtan, Mohammadreza
    Ghorani, Hamed
    Dorcheh, Soroush Soleimani
    Farnoud, Khashayar
    Salahshour, Faeze
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2024, 12
  • [10] Diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Y. Issa
    M. A. Kempeneers
    H. C. van Santvoort
    T. L. Bollen
    S. Bipat
    M. A. Boermeester
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 3820 - 3844