Diagnostic Value of Seven Different Imaging Modalities for Patients with Neuroblastic Tumors: A Network Meta-Analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Yu [1 ]
Xu, Yanfeng [1 ]
Kan, Ying [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Yang, Jigang [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Friendship Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划; 北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
I-123 METAIODOBENZYLGUANIDINE SCINTIGRAPHY; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; F-18-FDG PET; FOLLOW-UP; I-131; METAIODOBENZYLGUANIDINE; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; BONE; MIBG; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1155/2021/5333366
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the diagnostic value of seven different imaging modalities for the detection of neuroblastic tumors in diverse clinical settings. Methods. PubMed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify eligible studies from inception to Sep 29, 2020. Quality assessment of included studies was appraised with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Firstly, direct pairwise meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled estimates of odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and DR. Next, NMA using Bayesian methods was performed. The superiority index was assessed to quantify the rank probability of a diagnostic test. The studies performed SPECT/CT or SPECT were analyzed separately from the ones only performed planar imaging. Results. A total of 1135 patients from 32 studies, including 7 different imaging modalities, were eligible for this NMA. In the pairwise meta-analysis, F-18-FDOPA PET/CT had a relatively high value of all the outcomes (sensitivity: 10.195 [5.332-19.493]; specificity: 17.906 [5.950-53.884]; NPV: 16.819 [7.033-40.218]; PPV: 11.154 [4.216-29.512]; and DR 5.616 [3.609-8.739]). In the NMA, F-18-FDOPA PET/CT exhibited relatively high sensitivity in all subgroups (all data: 0.94 [0.87-0.98]; primary tumor: 0.89 [0.53-1]; bone/bone marrow metastases: 0.96 [0.83-1]; and primary tumor and metastases (P + M): 0.92 [0.80-0.97]), the highest specificity in the subgroup of P + M (0.85 [0.61-0.97]), and achieved the highest superiority index in the subgroups of all data (8.57 [1-15]) and P + M (7.25 [1-13]). Conclusion. F-18-FDOPA PET/CT exhibited the best diagnostic performance in the comprehensive detection of primary tumor and metastases for neuroblastic tumors, followed by Ga-68-somatostatin analogs, I-123-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), F-18-FDG, and I-131-MIBG tomographic imaging.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic value of different imaging features for patients with suspected gout: A network meta-analysis
    Stewart, Sarah
    Su, Isabel
    Gamble, Gregory
    Dalbeth, Nicola
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2021, 51 (06) : 1251 - 1257
  • [2] Diagnostic Value of Nineteen Different Imaging Methods for Patients with Breast Cancer: a Network Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Xiao-Hong
    Xiao, Can
    CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2018, 46 (05) : 2041 - 2055
  • [3] Diagnostic performance of different imaging modalities for splenic malignancies: A comparative meta-analysis
    Valizadeh, Parya
    Jannatdoust, Payam
    Tahamtan, Mohammadreza
    Ghorani, Hamed
    Dorcheh, Soroush Soleimani
    Farnoud, Khashayar
    Salahshour, Faeze
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2024, 12
  • [4] A Network Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of Different Imaging Methods for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical Cancer
    Luo, Qian
    Luo, Lan
    Tang, Liang
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2018, 17
  • [5] Contemporary Diagnostic Imaging Modalities for the Staging and Surveillance of Melanoma Patients: a Meta-analysis
    Xing, Yan
    Bronstein, Yulia
    Ross, Merrick I.
    Askew, Robert L.
    Lee, Jeffrey E.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    Royal, Richard
    Cormier, Janice N.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (02): : 129 - 142
  • [6] TFCC Injuries: Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities
    Treiser, Matthew D.
    Crawford, Kayva
    Iorio, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF WRIST SURGERY, 2018, 7 (03) : 267 - 272
  • [7] The value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer A protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Zhang, Mei
    Lian, Rongna
    Zhang, Ruinian
    Hong, Yulong
    Feng, Wen
    Feng, Shifang
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (19) : E25803
  • [8] Diagnostic performance of noninvasive imaging modalities for localization of insulinoma: A meta-analysis
    Yang, Yi
    Shi, Jian
    Zhu, Jianbing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 145
  • [9] Comparative diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Yu, Ping
    Zhou, Xujia
    Yue, Li
    Zhang, Ling
    Zhou, Yuan
    Jiang, Fei
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [10] Diagnostic imaging modalities for the surveillance of melanoma patients: A meta-analysis.
    Xing, Y.
    Bronstein, Y.
    Ross, M. I.
    Askew, R. L.
    Lee, J. E.
    Gershenwald, J. E.
    Royal, R.
    Cormier, J. N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)