Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units

被引:2
|
作者
Seo, Ganghyeon [1 ]
Choi, Hyo Geun [2 ]
Jang, Sookyung [1 ]
Choi, Sun [1 ]
Lee, Sa Ra [3 ]
Park, Su-Kyoung [1 ]
机构
[1] Hallym Univ, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 1 Singil Ro, Seoul 07441, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Hallym Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 22 Gwanpyeong Ro 170beon Gil, Anyang 14068, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
newborn hearing screening; auditory brainstem response; otoacoustic emissions; cesarean section; referral rate; FAILURE; GUIDELINES; MODE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10132923
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It is known that neonates born by cesarean delivery (CD) may have higher referral rates than those born by vaginal delivery (VD) for newborn hearing screening (NHS). False-positive NHS results can increase costs and parental anxiety. This study analyzed the differences in NHS referral rates according to delivery methods in Level I, II, and III neonatal care units. A retrospective chart review was done for 2322 infants (4644 ears) with delivery records who underwent NHS between 2004 and 2017. The first NHS was performed immediately before discharge when the infant was in good condition via the automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) or automated otoacoustic emissions (AOAE). There were 98 neonates (196 ears) who underwent both AABR and AOAE simultaneously as the first NHS, 30 of which failed. We used a total of 4810 ears in this analysis. Of all enrolled ears, 2075 ears were of neonates born by CD, and 2735 ears were of neonates born by VD. A total of 2460 ears were from patients in Level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and 2350 ears were from Level I and II neonatal care units. The overall referral rate was higher in infants born via CD (4.5%) than VD (3.2%). In Level I and II neonatal intensive care units, the referral rate was significantly higher in those born via CD (3.0%) than via VD (1.4%). Further, based on the screening method, AABR (75.8%) was more frequently used than AOAE (24.2%), thereby revealing AABR's higher referral rate in CD (2.9%) than in VD (1.2%). The referral rate of infants who underwent the NHS within three days of birth was higher in the CD group (3.0%) than in the VD group (1.3%). There was no significant difference in the referral rate depending on the delivery method when infants were hospitalized for more than four days or hospitalized in the NICU. The referral rate according to the delivery methods was significantly higher when the NHS test was performed for healthy newborns in the Level I and II neonatal care units born by CD within 72 h using AABR. Therefore, we recommend that the hearing screening test for newborns delivered by cesarean section be performed after 72 h of age. The results of this study may reduce the false-positive NHS results, unnecessary further tests, and parental anxiety.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Mode of delivery and level of neonatal care in Lombardy: a descriptive analysis according to volume of care
    Fabio Parazzini
    Sonia Cipriani
    Giuseppe Bulfoni
    Camilla Bulfoni
    Roberto Bellù
    Rinaldo Zanini
    Fabio Mosca
    Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 41
  • [22] Mode of delivery and level of neonatal care in Lombardy: a descriptive analysis according to volume of care
    Parazzini, Fabio
    Cipriani, Sonia
    Bulfoni, Giuseppe
    Bulfoni, Camilla
    Bellu, Roberto
    Zanini, Rinaldo
    Mosca, Fabio
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2015, 41
  • [23] Newborn hearing screening: importance and characteristics of a high-risk register in a neonatal intensive care unit
    Ahmed Sameh Farid
    Iman Abd El Salam Seoud
    Tarek Mohamed El Dessouky
    Marwa Mohamed El Shabrawy
    Zeinab Mohamed Mounir
    The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 2012, 28 (1) : 17 - 21
  • [24] Newborn hearing screening: importance and characteristics of a high-risk register in a neonatal intensive care unit
    Farid, Ahmed Sameh
    Seoud, Iman Abd El Salam
    El Dessouky, Tarek Mohamed
    El Shabrawy, Marwa Mohamed
    Mounir, Zeinab Mohamed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 28 (01): : 17 - 21
  • [25] Maternal and neonatal factors associated with mode of delivery under a universal newborn hearing screening programme in Lagos, Nigeria
    Olusanya, Bolajoko O.
    Solanke, Olumuyiwa A.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2009, 9 : 41
  • [26] Maternal and neonatal factors associated with mode of delivery under a universal newborn hearing screening programme in Lagos, Nigeria
    Bolajoko O Olusanya
    Olumuyiwa A Solanke
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9
  • [27] A Multicenter Initiative for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Newborn Screening in Texas Neonatal Intensive Care Units
    Gong, Alice
    Guillory, Charleta
    Creel, Liza
    Livingtson, Judith Ellen
    McKee-Garrett, Tiffany M.
    Fortunov, Regine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2017, 34 (09) : 839 - 844
  • [28] Delayed first otoacoustic emissions test decreases failure on neonatal hearing screening after caesarean delivery
    Smolkin, Tatiana
    Awawdeh, Sharehan
    Blazer, Shraga
    Mick, Orna
    Makhoul, Imad R.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2013, 102 (05) : e194 - e199
  • [29] Ten-year quality assurance of the nationwide hearing screening programme in Dutch neonatal intensive care units
    van Dommelen, P.
    van Straaten, H. L. M.
    Verkerk, P. H.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2011, 100 (08) : 1097 - 1103
  • [30] Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening programme in neonatal intensive care units
    van Straaten, HLM
    Hille, ETM
    Kok, JH
    Verkerk, PH
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2003, 92 (03) : 332 - 338