Usability-In-Place-Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review

被引:12
|
作者
Hill, Jordan R. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Janetta C. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Campbell, Noll L. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Holden, Richard J. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, 640 Eskenazi Ave, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Ctr Aging Res, Regenstrief Inst, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Ctr Hlth Innovat & Implementat Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ Hlth Bloomington, Dept Hlth & Wellness Design, Bloomington, IN 46204 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
mobile usability testing; usability inspection; methods; aging; literature synthesis; usability study; mobile usability; elderly; older adults; remote usability; mobility restriction; FIELD;
D O I
10.2196/26181
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Technology can benefit older adults in many ways, including by facilitating remote access to services, communication, and socialization for convenience or out of necessity when individuals are homebound. As people, especially older adults, self-quarantined and sheltered in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of usability-in-place became clear. To understand the remote use of technology in an ecologically valid manner, researchers and others must be able to test usability remotely. Objective: Our objective was to review practical approaches for and findings about remote usability testing, particularly remote usability testing with older adults. Methods: We performed a rapid review of the literature and reported on available methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and practical recommendations. This review also reported recommendations for usability testing with older adults from the literature. Results: Critically, we identified a gap in the literature-a lack of remote usability testing methods, tools, and strategies for older adults, despite this population's increased remote technology use and needs (eg, due to disability or technology experience). We summarized existing remote usability methods that were found in the literature as well as guidelines that are available for conducting in-person usability testing with older adults. Conclusions: We call on the human factors research and practice community to address this gap to better support older adults and other homebound or mobility-restricted individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Review of Usability Evaluation Methods and Their Use for Testing eHealth HIV Interventions
    Rindcy Davis
    Jessica Gardner
    Rebecca Schnall
    Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 2020, 17 : 203 - 218
  • [22] Usability testing of BusinessThinking™ e-learning CD-ROMs with older adults
    Stoltz-Loike, M
    Morrell, RW
    Loike, JD
    EDUCATIONAL GERONTOLOGY, 2005, 31 (10) : 765 - 786
  • [23] Home-Based Primary Care for Homebound Older Adults: Literature Review
    Kim, Chang-O
    Jang, Soong-Nang
    ANNALS OF GERIATRIC MEDICINE AND RESEARCH, 2018, 22 (02): : 62 - 72
  • [24] Designing a Computer-based Rehabilitation Solution for Older Adults: The Importance of Testing Usability
    Gonzalez-Palau, Fatima
    Franco, Manuel
    Toribio, Jose M.
    Losada, Raquel
    Parra, Esther
    Bamidis, Panagiotis
    PSYCHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (02): : 119 - 136
  • [25] Going Remote-Demonstration and Evaluation of Remote Technology Delivery and Usability Assessment With Older Adults: Survey Study
    Hill, Jordan R.
    Harrington, Addison B.
    Adeoye, Philip
    Campbell, Noll L.
    Holden, Richard J.
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (03):
  • [26] Usage and Application of Heatmap Visualizations on Usability User Testing: A Systematic Literature Review
    Davila, Fabricio
    Paz, Freddy
    Moquillaza, Arturo
    DESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE, AND USABILITY, DUXU 2023, PT III, 2023, 14032 : 3 - 17
  • [27] Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review
    Holthe, Torhild
    Halvorsrud, Liv
    Karterud, Dag
    Hoel, Kari-Anne
    Lund, Anne
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2018, 13 : 863 - 886
  • [28] A literature review about usability evaluation methods for e-learning platforms
    Freire, Luciana Lopes
    Arezes, Pedro Miguel
    Campos, Jose Creissac
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2012, 41 : 1038 - 1044
  • [29] PROTOTYPE GOOGLE MAPS WEB SITE TO SELECT NURSING HOMES: USABILITY TESTING BY OLDER ADULTS
    Xie, B.
    Pearson, G.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2009, 49 : 1 - 1
  • [30] An Online Psychological Program for Adolescents and Young Adults With Headaches: Iterative Design and Rapid Usability Testing
    Huguet, Anna
    Rozario, Sharlene
    Wozney, Lori
    Mcgrath, Patrick J.
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2023, 10