Multilevel Subdivision Parameterization Scheme for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization

被引:14
|
作者
Masters, D. A. [1 ]
Taylor, N. J. [2 ,4 ]
Rendall, T. C. S. [1 ]
Allen, C. B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
[2] MBDA UK Ltd, Bristol BS34 7QW, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Computat Aerodynam, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
[4] Aerodynam Tools & Methods, Z21,POB 5, Filton, England
基金
“创新英国”项目;
关键词
CFD-BASED OPTIMIZATION; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; DESIGN; PARAMETRIZATION; SURFACES;
D O I
10.2514/1.J055785
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Subdivision curves are defined as the limit of a recursive application of a subdivision rule to an initial set of control points. This intrinsically provides a hierarchical set of control polygons that can be used to provide surface control at varying levels of fidelity. This work presents a shape parameterization method based on this principle and investigates its application to aerodynamic optimization. The subdivision curves are used to construct a multilevel aerofoil parameterization that allows an optimization to be initialized with a small number of design variables, and then be periodically increased in resolution throughout. This brings the benefits of a low-fidelity optimization (high convergence rate, increased robustness, low-cost finite difference gradients) while still allowing the final results to be from a high-dimensional design space. In this work, the multilevel subdivision parameterization is tested on a variety of optimization problems and compared with a control group of single-level subdivision schemes. For all the optimization cases, the multilevel schemes provided robust and reliable results in contrast to the single-level methods that often experienced difficulties with large numbers of design variables. As a result of this, the multilevel methods exploited the high-dimensional design spaces better and consequently produced better overall results.
引用
收藏
页码:3288 / 3303
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A multilevel approach to Single- and multiobjective aerodynamic optimization
    Kampolis, Ioannis C.
    Giannakoglou, Kyriakos C.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 197 (33-40) : 2963 - 2975
  • [42] Aerodynamic Optimization Design Using Two-Stage Optimization Based on BezierGAN Parameterization
    Xie, Xiaoye
    Duan, Yanhui
    2023 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, VOL II, APISAT 2023, 2024, 1051 : 306 - 319
  • [43] Aerodynamic shape optimization by continually moving ROM
    Zhou, Li Li
    Jiu, Li Jin
    Jun, Zhang
    Kuan, Lu
    Ni, Yuan Mei
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 99
  • [44] Development of an efficient aerodynamic shape optimization framework
    Kim, Jong-Eun
    Rao, Vinay N.
    Koomullil, Roy P.
    Ross, Doug H.
    Soni, Bharat K.
    Shih, Alan M.
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2009, 79 (08) : 2373 - 2384
  • [45] The continuous adjoint approach in aerodynamic shape optimization
    Gauger, NR
    Brezillon, J
    Megaflow - Numerical Flow Simulation for Aircraft Design, 2005, 89 : 181 - 193
  • [46] Aerodynamic shape optimization of a Reno race plane
    Vassberg, JC
    Jameson, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEHICLE DESIGN, 2002, 28 (04) : 318 - 338
  • [47] Manifold Learning for Aerodynamic Shape Design Optimization
    Zheng, Boda
    Moni, Abhijith
    Yao, Weigang
    Xu, Min
    AEROSPACE, 2025, 12 (03)
  • [48] The Influence of Design Space on Aerodynamic Shape Optimization
    Wang, Yihua
    Duan, Yanhui
    2023 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, VOL II, APISAT 2023, 2024, 1051 : 506 - 522
  • [49] Effective direct methods for aerodynamic shape optimization
    Kraiko, A. A.
    P'yankov, K. S.
    COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS AND MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 50 (09) : 1546 - 1552
  • [50] Effective direct methods for aerodynamic shape optimization
    A. A. Kraiko
    K. S. P’yankov
    Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2010, 50 : 1546 - 1552