Task automata: Schedulability, decidability and undecidability

被引:83
|
作者
Fersman, Elena [1 ]
Krcal, Pavel [1 ]
Pettersson, Paul [1 ]
Yi, Wang [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Informat Technol, S-75105 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
real time systems; schedulability analysis; timed automata; modeling and verification;
D O I
10.1016/j.ic.2007.01.009
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We present a model, task automata, for real time systems with non-uniformly recurring computation tasks. It is an extended version of timed automata with asynchronous processes that are computation tasks generated (or triggered) by timed events. Compared with classical task models for real time systems, task automata may be used to describe tasks (1) that are generated non-deterministically according to timing constraints in timed automata, (2) that may have interval execution times representing the best case and the worst case execution times, and (3) whose completion times may influence the releases of task instances. We generalize the classical notion of schedulability to task automata. A task automaton is schedulable if there exists a scheduling strategy such that all possible sequences of events generated by the automaton are schedulable in the sense that all associated tasks can be computed within their deadlines. Our first technical result is that the schedulability for a given scheduling strategy can be checked algorithmically for the class of task automata when the best case and the worst case execution times of tasks are equal. The proof is based on a decidable class of suspension automata: timed automata with bounded subtraction in which clocks may be updated by subtractions within a bounded zone. We shall also study the borderline between decidable and undecidable cases. Our second technical result shows that the schedulability checking problem will be undecidable if the following three conditions hold: (1) the execution times of tasks are intervals, (2) the precise finishing time of a task instance may influence new task releases, and (3) a task is allowed to preempt another running task. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1149 / 1172
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Metric Propositional Neighborhood Logics: Expressiveness, Decidability, and Undecidability
    Bresolin, D.
    Della Monica, D.
    Goranko, V.
    Montanari, A.
    Sciavicco, G.
    ECAI 2010 - 19TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 215 : 695 - 700
  • [22] DECIDABILITY OR UNDECIDABILITY OF SOME THEORIES OF MEASURE-SPACES
    TULIPANI, S
    JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 1984, 49 (02) : 707 - 707
  • [23] DECIDABILITY, UNDECIDABILITY, AND GODEL'S INCOMPLETENESS IN RELATIVITY THEORIES
    Andreka, Hajnal
    Madarasz, Judit
    Nemeti, Istvan
    PARALLEL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2012, 22 (03)
  • [24] On the boundary between decidability and undecidability of asynchronous session subtyping
    Bravetti, Mario
    Carbone, Marco
    Zavattaro, Gianluigi
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2018, 722 : 19 - 51
  • [25] Cellular Automata, Decidability and Phasespace
    Sutner, K.
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2010, 104 (1-2) : 141 - 160
  • [26] Decidability, Introduction Rules and Automata
    Dowek, Gilles
    Jiang, Ying
    LOGIC FOR PROGRAMMING, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, AND REASONING, (LPAR-20 2015), 2015, 9450 : 97 - 111
  • [27] On the undecidability of the limit behavior of Cellular Automata
    Di Lena, P.
    Margara, L.
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2010, 411 (7-9) : 1075 - 1084
  • [28] Classes of timed automata and the undecidability of universality
    Moura, Arnaldo V.
    Pinto, Guilherme A.
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2008, 82 (1-2) : 171 - 184
  • [29] Refining the undecidability frontier of hybrid automata
    Mysore, V
    Pnueli, A
    FSTTCS 2005: FOUNDATIONS OF SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY AND THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3821 : 261 - 272
  • [30] On the Undecidability of Attractor Properties for Cellular Automata
    Di Lena, Pietro
    Margara, Luciano
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2012, 115 (01) : 75 - 85