Is there a "too big to fail" problem in the fied?

被引:177
|
作者
Papastergis, E. [1 ]
Giovanelli, R. [2 ]
Haynes, M. P. [2 ]
Shankar, F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Kapteyn Astron Inst, NL-9747 AD Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Astron, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] Univ Southampton, Sch Phys & Astron, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
来源
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS | 2015年 / 574卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
dark matter; galaxies: statistics; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: dwarf; radio lines: galaxies; COLD DARK-MATTER; H-I MASS; SUPERMASSIVE BLACK-HOLES; FAST ALPHA SURVEY; DWARF GALAXIES; STELLAR MASS; MILKY-WAY; VELOCITY FUNCTION; ROTATION CURVES; LAMBDA-CDM;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/201424909
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We use the Arecibo legacy fast ALFA (ALFALFA) 21 cm survey to measure the number density of galaxies as a function of their rotational velocity, Vmoti (as inferred from the width of their 21 cm emission line). Based on the measured velocity function we statistically connect galaxies with their host halo, via abundance matching. hi a lambda cold dark matter (ACI3M) cosmology, dwarf galaxies are expected to be hosted by halos that are significantly more massive than indicated by the measured galactic velocity: if smaller halos were allowed to host galaxies. then ALFALFA would measure a much higher galactic number density. We then seek observational verification of this predicted trend by analyzing the kinematics of a literature sample of gas-rich dwarf galaxies. We find that galaxies with Vint Hi 25 km sin are kinematically incompatible with their predicted ACDM host halos, in the sense that hosts are too massive to be accommodated within the measured galactic rotation curves. This issue is analogous to the "too big to fail" problem faced by the bright satellites of the Milky Way, but here it concerns extreme dwarf galaxies in the field. Consequently, solutions based on satellite-specific processes are not applicable in this context. Our result confirms the findings of previous studies based on optical survey data and addresses a number of observational systematics present in these works. Furthermore, we point out the assumptions and uncertainties that could strongly affect our conclusions. We show that the two most important among them namely baryonic effects on the abundances of halos and on the rotation curves of halos do not seem capable of resolving the reported discrepancy.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Editorial: Is the dollar ‘Too Big to Fail’?
    Kirk Dombrowski
    Anthony Marcus
    Ananthakrishnan Aiyer
    Dialectical Anthropology, 2010, 34 (2) : 159 - 165
  • [42] Discussion of "Are Banks Too Big to Fail?"
    Straetmans, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CENTRAL BANKING, 2010, 6 (04): : 251 - 258
  • [43] Too-Big-to-Fail Shareholders
    Yadav, Yesha
    MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 2019, 103 (02) : 587 - 663
  • [44] Risk externalities and too big to fail
    Taleb, Nassim N.
    Tapiero, Charles S.
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2010, 389 (17) : 3503 - 3507
  • [45] HDL-is it too big to fail?
    Ng, Dominic S.
    Wong, Norman C. W.
    Hegele, Robert A.
    NATURE REVIEWS ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 9 (05) : 308 - 312
  • [46] Too big to fail in the Local Group
    Garrison-Kimmel, Shea
    Boylan-Kolchin, Michael
    Bullock, James S.
    Kirby, Evan N.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 444 (01) : 222 - 236
  • [47] Too big to fail in light of Gaia
    Kaplinghat, Manoj
    Valli, Mauro
    Yu, Hai-Bo
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 490 (01) : 231 - 242
  • [48] Big Data in Epidemiology Too Big to Fail? Response
    Ball, Nicholas
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (06) : 939 - 940
  • [49] The Social Value of the Financial Sector: Too Big to Fail or Just Too Big?
    Barwell, Richard
    QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2016, 16 (06) : 839 - 843
  • [50] Connection between cusp-core problem and too-big-to-fail problem in CDM model
    Kato, Kazuki
    Mori, Masao
    Ogiya, Go
    GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GALAXY HALOS: STRUCTURE, ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 11 (S317): : 312 - 313