Seismic hazard scenarios from the longest geologically constrained active fault of the Aegean

被引:19
|
作者
Papanikolaou, Ioannis D.
Papanikolaou, Dimitrios I.
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Earth Sci, Hazard Res Ctr, London WC1 E6BT, England
[2] Univ Athens, Dept Geol & Geoenvironm, Lab Nat Hazards, Athens 15784, Greece
关键词
NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT; WESTWARD PROPAGATION; EVOLUTION; SEA; STRAIN; GROWTH; DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKES; KINEMATICS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.quaint.2007.03.020
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Several seismic hazard scenarios are examined concerning the seismic potential of the North Aegean Basin (NAB), based for the first time purely on geological data. Detailed analysis of the bathymetry incorporated by seismic reflection profiling has recently revealed the neotectonic structure of the NAB and demonstrates that the dominant structure is a 160 km long NE-SW trending fault, comprising of four major segments. This is the longest geologically constrained active fault in the Aegean Sea. Following deterministic fault specific analyses, six major seismic sources are identified. Firstly, a similar to 55 km oblique normal fault segment towards the Southwestern end of the basin, that can accommodate a M = 7.1 event. Such an event could produce a maximum vertical offset up to 3-4 in posing also a tsunami threat. Based on geological data a minimum throw rate of 1.2 +/- 0.2 mm/yr is estimated for this segment, implying a recurrence interval of 1100 +/- 3 50 yrs. Secondly, a sub-vertical similar to 70 km long, E W dextral trending shear zone northwards the southwestern corner of the N. Aegean basin that can generate a M = 7.2 strike-slip event. Sources 3 and 4 towards the central and eastern segment of the fault are expected to produce seismic strike slip events of M = 7.1, whereas the fifth source suggests the simultaneous activation of sources 3 and 4, producing a 105 km long rupture and a M = 7.4 event. Finally, the sixth source implies a inulti-segment rupture involving the entire 160 kin long south marginal fault, producing a M-max= 7.6, which represents the worst-case scenario. This value limits all uncertainties posed on the maximum expected magnitude by other published estimates (ranging from M = 7.2 up to 8.5) that are based solely on seismological and/or geodetic approaches. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 44
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surface trace of the active Katrol Hill Fault and estimation of paleo-earthquake magnitude for seismic hazard, Western India
    Tiwari, Prabhuti
    Maurya, D. M.
    Shaikh, Mohamedharoon
    Patidar, A. K.
    Vanik, Naimisha
    Padmalal, Akash
    Vasaikar, Swarali
    Chamyal, L. S.
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2021, 295
  • [42] Active faults, Paleoseismological trenching and seismic hazard assessment in the Northern Mygdonia Basin, Northern Greece: The Assiros-Krithia fault and the Drimos fault zone
    Papanikolaou, Ioannis
    Dafnis, Pavlos
    Deligiannakis, Georgios
    Hengesh, James
    Panagopoulos, Anestis
    QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 651 : 92 - 107
  • [43] Fault modelling, seismic sequence evolution and stress transfer scenarios for the July 20, 2017 (MW 6.6) Kos–Gökova Gulf earthquake, SE Aegean
    Sotirios Sboras
    Ilias Lazos
    Evaggelos Mouzakiotis
    Vassilios Karastathis
    Spyros Pavlides
    Alexandros Chatzipetros
    Acta Geophysica, 2020, 68 : 1245 - 1261
  • [44] Multi-scale imaging of a slow active fault zone: contribution for improved seismic hazard assessment in the Swiss Alpine foreland
    Vouillamoz, Naomi
    Mosar, Jon
    Deichmann, Nicholas
    SWISS JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 110 (02) : 547 - 563
  • [45] Geodetic fault slip rates on active faults in the Baza sub-Basin (SE Spain): Insights for seismic hazard assessment
    Alfaro, P.
    Sanchez-Alzola, A.
    Martin-Rojas, I.
    Garcia-Tortosa, F. J.
    Galindo-Zaldivar, J.
    Aviles, M.
    Garrido, A. C. Lopez
    Galdeano, C. Sanz de
    Ruano, P.
    Martinez-Moreno, F. J.
    Pedrera, A.
    Lacy, M. C.
    Borque, M. J.
    Medina-Cascales, I.
    Gil, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2021, 144
  • [46] Multi-scale imaging of a slow active fault zone: contribution for improved seismic hazard assessment in the Swiss Alpine foreland
    Naomi Vouillamoz
    Jon Mosar
    Nicholas Deichmann
    Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 110 : 547 - 563
  • [47] Fault modelling, seismic sequence evolution and stress transfer scenarios for the July 20, 2017 (MW6.6) Kos-Gokova Gulf earthquake, SE Aegean
    Sboras, Sotirios
    Lazos, Ilias
    Mouzakiotis, Evaggelos
    Karastathis, Vassilios
    Pavlides, Spyros
    Chatzipetros, Alexandros
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2020, 68 (05) : 1245 - 1261
  • [48] Earthquake damage scenarios and seismic hazard of Messina, north-eastern Sicily (Italy) as inferred from historical data
    Barbano, MS
    Azzaro, R
    Grasso, DE
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2005, 9 (06) : 805 - 830
  • [49] Evidence for active faulting in the eastern part of the Gulf of Saros, northern Aegean, from high-resolution seismic data
    Denizhan Vardar
    Journal of Earth System Science, 2019, 128
  • [50] Evidence for active faulting in the eastern part of the Gulf of Saros, northern Aegean, from high-resolution seismic data
    Vardar, Denizhan
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2019, 128 (03)