Trends in mental illness and suicidality after Hurricane Katrina

被引:337
|
作者
Kessler, R. C.
Galea, S.
Gruber, M. J.
Sampson, N. A.
Ursano, R. J.
Wessely, S.
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] USUHS, Dept Psychiat, Rockville, MD USA
[4] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, London, England
关键词
anxiety disorder; epidemiology; mood disorder; natural disaster; post-traumatic stress disorder;
D O I
10.1038/sj.mp.4002119
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A representative sample of 815 pre-hurricane residents of the areas affected by Hurricane Katrina was interviewed 5-8 months after the hurricane and again 1 year later as the Hurricane Katrina Community Advisory Group (CAG). The follow-up survey was carried out to study patterns-correlates of recovery from hurricane-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), broader anxiety-mood disorders and suicidality. The Trauma Screening Questionnaire screening scale of PTSD and the K6 screening scale of anxiety-mood disorders were used to generate DSM-IV prevalence estimates. Contrary to results in other disaster studies, where post-disaster mental disorder typically decreases with time, prevalence increased significantly in the CAG for PTSD (20.9 vs 14.9% at baseline), serious mental illness (SMI; 14.0 vs 10.9%), suicidal ideation (6.4 vs 2.8%) and suicide plans (2.5 vs 1.0%). The increases in PTSD-SMI were confined to respondents not from the New Orleans Metropolitan Area, while the increases in suicidal ideation-plans occurred both in the New Orleans sub-sample and in the remainder of the sample. Unresolved hurricane-related stresses accounted for large proportions of the inter-temporal increases in SMI (89.2%), PTSD (31.9%) and suicidality (61.6%). Differential hurricane-related stress did not explain the significantly higher increases among respondents from areas other than New Orleans, though, as this stress was both higher initially and decreased less among respondents from the New Orleans Metropolitan Area than from other areas affected by the hurricane. Outcomes were only weakly related to socio-demographic variables, meaning that high prevalence of hurricane-related mental illness remains widely distributed in the population nearly 2 years after the hurricane.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 384
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A review of mental health issues as a result of Hurricane Katrina
    Potash, Mordecai N.
    Winstead, Daniel K.
    PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS, 2008, 38 (02) : 119 - 124
  • [22] Mental Health Symptoms in Youth Affected by Hurricane Katrina
    Roberts, Yvonne Humenay
    Mitchell, Monica J.
    Witman, Marjorie
    Taffaro, Craig
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2010, 41 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [23] Life after Hurricane Katrina: The Resilience in Survivors of Katrina (RISK) Project
    Waters, Mary C.
    SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM, 2016, 31 : 750 - 769
  • [24] After Hurricane Katrina: The Tulane Recovery Project
    Topper, Elisa F.
    NEW LIBRARY WORLD, 2011, 112 (1-2) : 45 - 51
  • [25] Establishing and operating shelters after Hurricane Katrina
    Phillips, Brenda D.
    Wikle, Thomas A.
    Hakim, Angela Head
    Pike, Lynn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 8 (02) : 153 - 167
  • [26] Worker mobility before and after Hurricane Katrina
    Clayton, Richard L.
    Spletzer, James R.
    MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 2006, 129 (08) : 11 - 21
  • [27] Reconnaissance of levee failures after hurricane Katrina
    Nicholson, Peter
    Silva-Tulla, Francisco
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2008, 161 (03) : 124 - 131
  • [28] Hurricane Katrina: Five Years After Introduction
    Monteith, Sharon
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN STUDIES, 2010, 44 (03) : 475 - 482
  • [29] Immediate Resource Requirements after Hurricane Katrina
    Holguin-Veras, Jose
    Jaller, Miguel
    NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW, 2012, 13 (02) : 117 - 131
  • [30] Returning to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina
    Paxson, Christina
    Rouse, Cecilia Elena
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (02): : 38 - 42