Study of packet level UDP performance of NAT44, NAT64 and IPv6 using iperf in the context of IPv6 migration

被引:0
|
作者
Barayuga, Vitruvius John D. [1 ]
Yu, William Emmanuel S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ilocos Sur Polytech State Coll, Inst Comp Studies, Santa Maria, Ilocos Sur, Philippines
[2] Ateneo Manila Univ, Dept Informat Syst & Comp Sci, Quezon City, Philippines
关键词
IPv6; migration; NAT44; NAT64; IPv6 transition mechanism;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) allocated the last of the available /8's of the IPv4 address space to the Regional Internet Registries (RIR's) on February 2011. It could not be denied that IPv6 is the Internet of the next generation, however its utilization and implementation in a wide scale had brought hesitation to the users since it will take time and there are concerns that need to be explored in the future. Hence, this paper will lead the way for the acceptance of Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) migration in the Philippines using a similar Network Address Translation (NAT) that there is an apparent means to be taken into consideration and NAT IPv6 to IPv4 (NAT64) can be a good choice for computer networks with the similar situation like the Philippines which is behind NAT44, showing service providers and institutions in putting NAT64 as a viable option to be used. Therefore it is concluded, where overall performance revealed that IPv6 and NAT64 network offered better performance against the NAT44 network in almost all of the metrics in the iperf generic UDP mode test. For time transfer, IPv6 had 19% less and NAT64 with 31% less where both executed the transfer in a lesser time compared to NAT44 networks with 48% which is longer than the results of the aforementioned networks. In the bandwidth utilization, it is presented that IPv6 network had 43% and NAT64 network with 41% offered better bandwidth utilization as compared to NAT44 network with 15%. IPv6 network had 49% showed faster transfer rate along with NAT64 network with 39% in comparison to the NAT44 network with only 10% transfer. For jitter, IPv6 network had lesser average with 28% and so with NAT64 network with 31% compared to NAT44 with 40% jitter which is a quite bigger than the other experimental networks. For packet loss, IPv6 network had 26% and NAT64 network with 33% compared to NAT44 network that had 40% bigger than the other experimental networks.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IPSec support in NAT-PT scenario for IPv6 transition
    Jung, S
    Choi, J
    Kim, Y
    Kim, S
    INFORMATION SECURITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3650 : 194 - 202
  • [22] The Conversion Gateway of IPv4/IPv6 Communication Based on NAT-PT
    Wang Shusen
    Li Xiaojing
    PROCEEDING OF 2012 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM - EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2012, : 175 - 178
  • [23] 面向NAT用户的IPV6过渡机制研究
    曹生林
    电脑知识与技术, 2009, 5 (27) : 7653 - 7654
  • [24] 穿越动态NAT的IPv6 over IPv4隧道方案
    陈辉煌
    魏畅
    电力系统通信, 2009, 30 (02) : 48 - 52
  • [25] NAT vs. Ipv6 just the tip of a larger problem
    Goth, G
    IEEE INTERNET COMPUTING, 2005, 9 (02) : 6 - 9
  • [26] A novel IPv4/IPv6 translation mechanism based on NAT-PT
    Shi, Wenming
    Huang, Chuanhe
    Wang, Qinggang
    Chen, Yan
    Huang, Yiming
    Cheng, Yong
    9th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology: Toward Network Innovation Beyond Evolution, Vols 1-3, 2007, : 1037 - 1041
  • [27] The performance analysis of NAT-PT and DSTM for IPv6 dominant network deployment
    Shin, MK
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2005, E88B (12) : 4664 - 4666
  • [28] Performance analysis of probabilistic packet marking in IPv6
    Dang, Xuan-Hien
    Albright, Emil
    Abonamah, Abdullah A.
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2007, 30 (16) : 3193 - 3202
  • [29] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF IPV6 PACKET CLASSFICATION WITH CACHING
    Ho, Kai-Yuan
    Chen, Yaw-Chung
    2008 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING IN CHINA, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 636 - 640
  • [30] IPv4与IPv6动态NAT-PT技术的实现
    刘昕
    微型电脑应用, 2011, 27 (12) : 61 - 62+71