Deep CO2 emission reductions in a global bottom-up model approach

被引:14
|
作者
Deetman, Sebastiaan [1 ]
Hof, Andries F. [2 ]
van Vuuren, Detlef P. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Environm Sci CML, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, NL-3721 MA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Geosci, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
bottom-up; energy modelling; mitigation scenarios; ENERGY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2014.912980
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Most studies that explore deep GHG emission reduction scenarios assume that climate goals are reached by implementing least-cost emission mitigation options, typically by implementing a global carbon tax. Although such a method provides insight into total mitigation costs, it does not provide much information about how to achieve a transition towards a low-carbon energy system, which is of critical importance to achieving ambitious climate targets. To enable sensible deep emission reduction strategies, this study analysed the effectiveness of 16 specific mitigation measures on a global level up to 2050, by using an energy-system simulation model called TIMER. The measures range from specific energy efficiency measures, like banning traditional light bulbs and subsidizing electric vehicles, to broader policies like introducing a carbon tax in the electricity sector. All measures combined lead to global CO2 emission reductions ranging between 39% and 73% compared to baseline by 2050, depending on the inclusion of sectoral carbon taxes and the availability of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and nuclear power. Although the effectiveness of the measures differs largely across regions, this study indicates that measures aimed at stimulating low-carbon electricity production result in the highest reductions in all regions.Policy relevanceThe results of the calculations can be used to evaluate the effects of individual climate change mitigation measures and identify priorities in discussions on global and regional policies. The type of fragmented policy scenarios presented here could provide a relevant bottom-up alternative to cost-optimal implementation of policies driven by a carbon tax. We identify overlapping and even counter-productive climate policy measures through an analysis that presents the policy effectiveness by region, and by sector. The set of 16 policy measures addresses the largest emitting sectors and represents options that are often discussed as part of planned policies.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 271
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Holographic bottom-up approach to Σ baryons
    郭溪
    Miguel Angel Martin Contreras
    陈勋
    向东
    Chinese Physics C, 2025, 49 (01) : 100 - 109
  • [42] A bottom-up approach to cell mechanics
    Bausch, AR
    Kroy, K
    NATURE PHYSICS, 2006, 2 (04) : 231 - 238
  • [43] A Bottom-Up Competency Modeling Approach
    Marques, Joao
    Zacarias, Marielba
    Tribolet, Jose
    ADVANCES IN ENTERPRISE ENGINEERING IV, 2010, 49 : 50 - 64
  • [44] Jump on visualization: The bottom-up approach
    Comput Sci Eng, 2 (83-87):
  • [45] A Bottom-Up Approach to Machine Ethics
    Castro, Jose F.
    ALIFE 2016, THE FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE SYNTHESIS AND SIMULATION OF LIVING SYSTEMS, 2016, : 719 - +
  • [46] Bottom-up holographic approach to QCD
    Afonin, S. S.
    XITH CONFERENCE ON QUARK CONFINEMENT AND HADRON SPECTRUM, 2016, 1701
  • [47] A Bottom-Up Approach to Creating Chemicals
    Frishberg, Manny
    RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2015, 58 (05) : 7 - 8
  • [48] A bottom-up approach to clausal tableaux
    Peltier, Nicolas
    AUTOMATED REASONING WITH ANALYTIC TABLEAUX AND RELATED METHODS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4548 : 199 - +
  • [49] A bottom-up approach to gene regulation
    Guido, NJ
    Wang, X
    Adalsteinsson, D
    McMillen, D
    Hasty, J
    Cantor, CR
    Elston, TC
    Collins, JJ
    NATURE, 2006, 439 (7078) : 856 - 860
  • [50] Bottom-up approach to graphene nanoribbons
    Sealy, Cordelia
    NANO TODAY, 2010, 5 (05) : 374 - 376