Comparison of transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement and Bishop score for predicting labour induction outcomes

被引:4
|
作者
Vince, Katja [1 ]
Poljicanin, Tamara [2 ]
Matijevic, Ratko [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Merkur, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Zajceva 19, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Croatian Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
Bishop score; labour induction; prediction; transvaginal sonography; unfavourable cervix; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1515/jpm-2022-0140
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives Induction of labour (IOL) is of increasing prevalence worldwide and reliable prediction of its successful outcome is important. Traditional clinical methods for predicting successful IOL outcomes have been supplemented with newer technologies. The aim of this study was to compare transvaginal sonographic (TVS) cervical length measurement with Bishop score in predicting labour induction outcomes. Methods This study included pregnant women with term pregnancy, indication for IOL and unfavourable cervix (Bishop score >6) who had TVS performed prior to IOL. Exclusion critetia were regular contractions, ruptured membranes, non-cephalic presentation, uterine scar and pregnancy complications potentially influencing study outcomes. Outcomes measured were successful IOL defined as achievement of active phase of labour and vaginal delivery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. Statistical significance was defined as pResults Among 112 studied participants, IOL was successful in 101 (90.2%) pregnant women. AUC for Bishop score >2 was 0.831 (95% CI, 0.744-0.917, p<0.001) and for cervical length <30 mm 0.679 (95% CI 0.514-0.844, p<0.052). A total of 81 (72.3%) pregnant women delivered vaginally; AUC for Bishop score >2 was 0.754 (95% CI 0.648-0.861, p<0.001) and for cervical length <30 mm 0.602 (95% CI 0.484-0.720, p=0.092) which was the only insignificant predictor. Conclusions Bishop score >2 is a better predictor for both successful IOL and vaginal delivery among induced women with term pregnancy and unfavourable cervix compared to cervical length <30 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1202
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of transperineal ultrasound cervical length and fetal head- perineum distance measurements with a simplified bishop score in predicting induction of labor outcome: What is new?
    Usman, Mohammed
    Adekunle, Oguntayo O.
    Umma, Bawa S.
    Iliyasu, Abbas
    Joseph, Igashi B.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 20 (02) : 171 - 176
  • [42] Can measurement of cervical length, fetal head position and posterior cervical angle be an alternative method to Bishop score in the prediction of successful labor induction?
    Gokturk, Umut
    Cavkaytar, Sabri
    Danisman, Nuri
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (11): : 1360 - 1365
  • [43] Sonographic cervical length measurement before Labor induction in term nulliparous women
    Daskalakis, G
    Thomakos, N
    Hatziioannou, L
    Mesogitis, S
    Papantoniou, N
    Antsaklis, A
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2006, 21 (01) : 34 - 38
  • [44] In the presence of premature contraction, which exam is more predictive of premature birth - bishop score or sonographic cervical length?
    Sharvit, Merav
    Ganor-Paz, Yael
    Weiss, Reut
    Tzadikevitch-Geffen, Keren
    Danielli-Miller, Netanella
    Fejgin, Moshe
    Biron-Shental, Tal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S404 - S404
  • [45] Cervix assessment for the management of labor induction: Reliability of cervical length and Bishop score determined by residents
    Garcia-Simon, Raquel
    Oros, Daniel
    Gracia-Colera, Daniel
    Moreno, Esther
    Paules, Cristina
    Canizares, Silvia
    Gascon, Elena
    Fabre, Ernesto
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (03) : 377 - 382
  • [46] Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies
    Meijer-Hoogeveen, M.
    Stoutenbeek, P.
    Visser, G. H. A.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 32 (05) : 657 - 662
  • [47] Transvaginal ultrasonography-measured cervical length versus the modified Bishop score for preinduction cervical assessment at term: A randomised controlled trial
    Okafor, Chigozie G.
    Eleje, George U.
    Ikechebelu, Joseph I.
    Okafor, Chisolum O.
    Nwosu, Betrand O.
    Okafor, Chidinma C.
    Udigwe, Gerald O.
    Mamah, Johnbosco E.
    Ezema, Evaristus C.
    Ogabido, Chukwudi A.
    Obiagwu, Hillary, I
    Okoro, Chukwuemeka C.
    Njoku, Tobechi K.
    Olisa, Chinedu L.
    Okaforcha, Emmanuel, I
    Okonkwo, Ifeanyi O.
    Okafor, Lazarus U.
    Okoye, Kelechi U.
    Nnabuchi, Obinna K.
    Agbanu, Chiemezie M.
    Eke, Ahizechukwu C.
    ULTRASOUND, 2024,
  • [48] Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length changes during triplet gestation
    Maymon, R
    Herman, A
    Jauniaux, E
    Frenkel, J
    Ariely, S
    Sherman, D
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (05) : 956 - 960
  • [49] The value of Sonographic measurement of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing in predicting preterm delivery
    Salar, Zeki
    Simsek, Mehmet
    Akar, Munire Erman
    Mendilcioglu, Inanc
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 4 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [50] Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasound for preinduction cervical assessment:: a randomized clinical trial
    Bartha, JL
    Romero-Carmona, R
    Martínez-Del-Fresno, P
    Comino-Delgado, R
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (02) : 155 - 159