Adverse prognostic impact of the CpG island methylator phenotype in metastatic colorectal cancer

被引:35
|
作者
Cha, Yongjun [1 ]
Kim, Kyung-Ju [2 ]
Han, Sae-Won [1 ,3 ]
Rhee, Ye Young [2 ]
Bae, Jeong Mo [2 ]
Wen, Xianyu [2 ]
Cho, Nam-Yun [2 ]
Lee, Dae-Won [1 ]
Lee, Kyung-Hun [1 ]
Kim, Tae-Yong [1 ]
Oh, Do-Youn [1 ,3 ]
Im, Seock-Ah [1 ,3 ]
Bang, Yung-Jue [1 ,3 ]
Jeong, Seung-Yong [4 ]
Park, Kyu Joo [4 ]
Kang, Gyeong Hoon [2 ]
Kim, Tae-You [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Canc Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Convergence Sci & Technol, Dept Mol Med & Biopharmaceut Sci, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
colorectal cancer; CpG island methylator phenotype; chemotherapy; prognosis; DNA METHYLATION; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; STAGE-III; SURVIVAL BENEFIT; GENE-EXPRESSION; BRAF MUTATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; CIMP; 5-FLUOROURACIL; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2016.176
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The association between the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and clinical outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear. We investigated the prognostic impact of CIMP in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy. Methods: Eight CIMP-specific promoters (CACNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3, SOCS1, CDKN2A, CRABP1, and MLH1) were examined. The CIMP status was determined by the number of methylated promoters as high (>= 5), low (1-4), and negative (0). Results: A total of 153 patients were included (men/women, 103/50; median age, 61 years; range, 22-80 years). The CIMP status was negative/low/high in 77/69/7 patients, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was significantly different among the three CIMP groups, with median values of 35.7, 22.2, and 9.77 months for the negative, low, and high groups, respectively (P<0.001). For patients treated with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin first-line chemotherapy (N = 128), OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly different among the three CIMP groups; the median OS was 37.9, 23.8, and 6.77 months for the negative, low, and high groups, respectively (P<0.001), while the median PFS was 9.97, 7.87, and 1.83 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Response rates were marginally different among the three CIMP groups (53.4% vs 45.1% vs 16.7%, respectively; P = 0.107). For patients treated with fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan second-line chemotherapy (N = 86), only OS showed a difference according to the CIMP status, with median values of 20.4, 13.4, and 2.90 months for the negative, low, and high groups, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusions: The CIMP status is a negative prognostic factor for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 171
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Different definitions of CpG island methylator phenotype and outcomes of colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Jia, Min
    Gao, Xu
    Zhang, Yan
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    Brenner, Hermann
    CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2016, 8 : 1 - 14
  • [42] CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in Puerto Rican Hispanic colorectal cancer patients
    Bernabe-Dones, Raul D.
    Cruz-Correa, Marcia R.
    Castro, Cristina I.
    Lacourt, Mercedes Y.
    Rodriguez, Heriberto
    Castillo, Xiomara M.
    Marcano, Isabel C.
    Nunez, Cristina
    Baez, Noelia
    Lozada, Maria E.
    Maldonado, Meredid S.
    Oliveras, Luis F.
    Cardona, Alberto
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [43] Evaluation of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype as a Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Oxaliplatin
    Cohen, Stacey A.
    Wu, Chen
    Yu, Ming
    Gourgioti, Georgia
    Wirtz, Ralph
    Raptou, Georgia
    Gkakou, Chryssa
    Kotoula, Vassiliki
    Pentheroudakis, George
    Papaxoinis, George
    Karavasilis, Vasilios
    Pectasides, Dimitrios
    Kalogeras, Konstantine T.
    Fountzilas, George
    Grady, William M.
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (02) : 164 - 169
  • [44] Association of CpG island methylator phenotype and EREG/AREG methylation and expression in colorectal cancer
    Lee, Michael S.
    McGuffey, Elizabeth J.
    Morris, Jeffrey S.
    Manyam, Ganiraju
    Baladandayuthapani, Veerabahdran
    Wei, Wei
    Morris, Van K.
    Overman, Michael J.
    Maru, Dipen M.
    Jiang, Zhi-Qin
    Hamilton, Stanley R.
    Kopetz, Scott
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 114 (12) : 1352 - 1361
  • [45] Unique characteristics of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in a Chinese population with colorectal cancer
    Jiang Liu
    Li Tang
    Jinhua Yi
    Guimei Li
    Youwang Lu
    Yu Xu
    Shuhua Zhao
    Rui Mao
    Xiaolu Li
    Li Ren
    Kunhua Wang
    BMC Gastroenterology, 19
  • [46] Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer
    R. F. Kokelaar
    H. Jones
    J. Beynon
    M. E. Evans
    D. A. Harris
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2018, 33 : 995 - 1000
  • [47] Prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype among colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Juo, Y. Y.
    Johnston, F. M.
    Zhang, D. Y.
    Juo, H. H.
    Wang, H.
    Pappou, E. P.
    Yu, T.
    Easwaran, H.
    Baylin, S.
    van Engeland, M.
    Ahuja, N.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (12) : 2314 - 2327
  • [48] CpG island methylator phenotype and patients with multiple colorectal cancers.
    Grady, WM
    Markowitz, S
    Willis, J
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 118 (04) : A46 - A46
  • [49] Marked and independent prognostic significance of the CpG island methylator phenotype in neuroblastomas
    Abe, Masanobu
    Westermann, Frank
    Nakagawara, Akira
    Takato, Tsuyoshi
    Schwab, Manfred
    Ushijima, Toshikazu
    CANCER LETTERS, 2007, 247 (02) : 253 - 258
  • [50] Clinical application of the CpG island methylator phenotype to prognostic diagnosis in neuroblastomas
    Kiyoshi Asada
    Masanobu Abe
    Toshikazu Ushijima
    Journal of Human Genetics, 2013, 58 : 428 - 433