The impact of agricultural biotechnology on supply and land-use

被引:33
|
作者
Barrows, Geoffrey [1 ]
Sexton, Steven [2 ]
Zilberman, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Univ Calif, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Davis, CA USA
关键词
ECONOMICS; TECHNOLOGY; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1017/S1355770X14000400
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We use aggregate data to estimate supply, price, land-use, and greenhouse gas impacts of genetically engineered (GE) seed adoption due both to increased yield per hectare (intensive margin) and increased planted area (extensive margin). An adoption model with profitability and risk considerations distinguishes between the two margins, where the intensive margin results from direct 'gene' impacts and higher complimentary input use, and the extensive margin reflects the growing range of lands that become profitable with the GE technology. We identify yield increases from cross-country time series variation in GE adoption share within the main GE crops - cotton, corn and soybeans. We find that GE increased yields 34 per cent for cotton, 12 per cent for corn and 3 per cent for soybeans. We then estimate the quantity of extensive margin lands from year-to-year changes in traditional and GE planted area. If all production on the extensive margin is attributed to GE technology, the supply effect of GE increases from 5 per cent to 12 per cent for corn, 15 per cent to 20 per cent for cotton, and 2 per cent to 40 per cent for soybeans, generating significant downward pressure on prices. Finally, we compute 'saved' lands and greenhouse gases as the difference between observed hectarage per crop and counterfactual hectarage needed to generate the same output without the yield boost from GE. We find that altogether, GE saved 13 million hectares of land from conversion to agriculture in 2010, and averted emissions are equivalent to roughly one-eighth of the annual emissions from automobiles in the US.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 703
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] POLICY ALTERNATIVES FOR PRESERVATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE
    LAPPING, MB
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1977, 5 (03) : 275 - 287
  • [32] TYPES OF AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE IN MOSCOW OBLAST
    BOZHYEVA, TG
    SOVIET GEOGRAPHY, 1988, 29 (01): : 46 - 54
  • [33] EVALUATING AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE CHANGE IN ILLINOIS
    DOVRING, F
    CHICOINE, DL
    BRADEN, JB
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1982, 37 (06) : 359 - 361
  • [34] AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE AND ASSOCIATED PROBLEMS IN RWANDA
    NWAFOR, JC
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL GEOGRAPHY, 1979, 48 (JUN): : 58 - 65
  • [35] Drivers of agricultural land-use change in Scotland
    Birnie, RV
    Mather, AS
    Understanding Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Global and Regional Context, 2005, : 147 - 163
  • [36] AN ASSESSMENT OF LAND CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUES IN PLANNING FOR AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE
    FLAHERTY, M
    SMIT, B
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1982, 15 (04) : 323 - 332
  • [37] THE IMPACT OF LAND-USE PLANNING AND TAX SUBSIDIES ON THE SUPPLY AND PRICE OF HOUSING IN BRITAIN
    BRAMLEY, G
    URBAN STUDIES, 1993, 30 (01) : 5 - 30
  • [38] LAND-USE, CLIMATE, AND WATER-SUPPLY
    WU, RS
    HAITH, DA
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1993, 119 (06): : 685 - 704
  • [39] Impact of land-use change on climate
    Ming Cai
    Eugenia Kalnay
    Nature, 2004, 427 : 214 - 214
  • [40] Agricultural and Forest Land-Use Impact on Soil Properties in Zagreb Periurban Area (Croatia)
    Bogunovic, Igor
    Viduka, Antonio
    Magdic, Ivan
    Telak, Leon Josip
    Francos, Marcos
    Pereira, Paulo
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (09):