Social Sustainability as Social Learning: Insights from Multi-Stakeholder Environmental Governance

被引:15
|
作者
Hovardas, Tasos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cyprus, Res Sci & Technol Educ Grp, CY-1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
[2] CALLISTO Wildlife & Nat Conservat Soc, Thessaloniki 54621, Greece
关键词
environmental governance; multi-stakeholder schemes; power; social learning; social sustainability; stakeholder collaboration; stakeholder conflict; toolkit; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; RISK-MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; WATER; PARTICIPATION; CHALLENGES; CONFLICT; RESILIENCE; PLATFORMS;
D O I
10.3390/su13147744
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Social sustainability has for long been either neglected or downplayed in scientific literature and policy making and it remains an unsettled concept. The present paper critically examines several explanations for the unequal development of the social component of sustainability and suggests that social learning can serve as an insightful anchor for conceptualizing and operationalizing social sustainability. Collaborative governance is used to showcase this approach, specifically, a targeted review of multi-stakeholder schemes in natural resource management, wildlife conservation, and protected area governance. These schemes can exemplify a wide array of commonalities between the fields of social sustainability and social learning and reveal a fruitful cross-fertilization of the two concepts. The paper wishes to make two contributions. First, a specific dialectic between stakeholder collaboration and conflict under power asymmetries will be illustrated, which is characteristic in the operation of many multi-stakeholder governance schemes. Second, the need for scaffolding social learning in such schemes will be demonstrated so that a process-oriented account of social sustainability is attained. The way out offered by the present paper is that the dynamics between collaboration and conflict, properly managed by means of a toolkit with social learning templates for multi-stakeholder environmental governance schemes, may serve as a precondition for innovations sought.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intelligent multi-stakeholder environmental management
    Mianabadi, Hojat
    Afshar, Abbas
    Zarghami, Mandi
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (01) : 862 - 866
  • [22] Stakeholder engagement in water governance as social learning: lessons from practice
    Wehn, Uta
    Collins, Kevin
    Anema, Kim
    Basco-Carrera, Laura
    Lerebours, Alix
    WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 43 (01) : 34 - 59
  • [23] The corporate social responsibility and the right of competition in Colombia: A vision from the social economy of the market and the multi-stakeholder theory
    Ivan Morgestein-Sanchez, Wilson
    REVISTA REPUBLICANA, 2019, (27): : 69 - 87
  • [24] Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: insights from two case studies in India
    Eldidi, Hagar
    Rawat, Shivanyaa
    Meinzen-Dick, Ruth
    Chaturvedi, Rahul
    Sanil, Richu
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [25] Understanding communication and stakeholder learning process affecting sustainability in multi-stakeholder platforms: The case of a Learning Alliance in Vietnam
    Quilloy, Reianne M.
    Flor, Rica Joy
    Flor, Benjamina Paula G.
    OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2025, 54 (01) : 105 - 119
  • [26] Stakeholder treatment disparity and employee whistleblowing: A multi-stakeholder, multidimensional framework of social comparison
    Qian, Cuili
    Liu, Yilin
    Takeuchi, Riki
    Wu, Junfeng
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2025, 46 (04) : 898 - 928
  • [27] Co-production of Knowledge in Multi-stakeholder Processes: Analyzing Joint Experimentation as Social Learning
    Akpo, Essegbemon
    Crane, Todd A.
    Vissoh, Pierre V.
    Tossou, Rigobert C.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2015, 21 (04): : 369 - 388
  • [28] The Governance of Social Standards in Emerging Markets: An exploration of actors and interests shaping Trustea as a Southern multi-stakeholder initiative
    Langford, Natalie J.
    GEOFORUM, 2019, 104 : 81 - 91
  • [29] From risk perception to risk governance in nanotechnology: a multi-stakeholder study
    Porcari, Andrea
    Borsella, Elisabetta
    Benighaus, Christina
    Grieger, Khara
    Isigonis, Panagiotis
    Chakravarty, Somik
    Kines, Pete
    Jensen, Keld Alstrup
    JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (11)
  • [30] From risk perception to risk governance in nanotechnology: a multi-stakeholder study
    Andrea Porcari
    Elisabetta Borsella
    Christina Benighaus
    Khara Grieger
    Panagiotis Isigonis
    Somik Chakravarty
    Pete Kines
    Keld Alstrup Jensen
    Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2019, 21