Two-Year Longitudinal Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Trial of Physical Activity Promotion by General Practitioners

被引:39
|
作者
Grandes, Gonzalo [1 ]
Sanchez, Alvaro [1 ]
Montoya, Imanol [1 ]
Ortega Sanchez-Pinilla, Ricardo [2 ]
Torcal, Jesus [3 ]
机构
[1] BHS, Primary Care Res Unit Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain
[2] Castilla La Mancha Healthcare Serv, Santa Barbara Primary Care Ctr, Toledo, Spain
[3] Basque Healthcare Serv, Basauri Ariz Primary Care Ctr, Basauri, Spain
来源
PLOS ONE | 2011年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
PRIMARY-CARE; LEISURE-TIME; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0018363
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: We evaluate the effectiveness of a physical activity promotion programme carried out by general practitioners with inactive patients in routine care. Methods and Findings: Pragmatic, cluster randomised clinical trial conducted in eleven public primary care centres in Spain. Fifty-six general practitioners (GPs) were randomly assigned to intervention (29) or standard care (27) groups. They assessed the physical activity level of a systematic sample of patients in routine practice and recruited 4317 individuals (2248 intervention and 2069 control) who did not meet minimum physical activity recommendations. Intervention GPs provided advice to all patients and a physical activity prescription to the subgroup attending an additional appointment (30%). A third of these prescriptions were opportunistically repeated. Control GPs provided standard care. Primary outcome measure was the change in self-reported physical activity from baseline to six, 12 and 24 months. Secondary outcomes included cardiorespiratory fitness and health-related quality of life. A total of 3691 patients (85%) were included in the longitudinal analysis and overall trends over the whole 24 month follow-up were significantly better in the intervention group (p < 0.01). The greatest differences with the control group were observed at six months (adjusted difference 1.7 MET*hr/wk [95% CI, 0.8 to 2.6], 25 min/wk [95% CI, 11.3 to 38.4], and a 5.3% higher percentage of patients meeting minimum recommendations [95% CI: 2.1% to 8.8%] NNT = 19). These differences were not statistically significant at 12 and 24 months. No differences were found in secondary outcomes. A significant difference was maintained until 24 months in the proportion of patients achieving minimum recommendation in the subgroup that received a repeat prescription (adjusted difference 10.2%, 95% CI 1.5% to 19.4%). Conclusions: General practitioners are effective at increasing the level of physical activity among their inactive patients during the initial six-months of an intervention but this effect wears off at 12 and 24 months. Only in the subgroup of patients receiving repeat prescriptions of physical activity is the effect maintained in long-term.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Two-year effects of a school-based prevention programme on adolescent cigarette smoking in Guangzhou, China: a cluster randomized trial
    Wen, Xiaozhong
    Chen, Weiqing
    Gans, Kim M.
    Colby, Suzanne M.
    Lu, Ciyong
    Liang, Caihua
    Ling, Wenhua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (03) : 860 - 876
  • [32] Physical Complications in Acute Lung Injury Survivors: A Two-Year Longitudinal Prospective Study
    Fan, Eddy
    Dowdy, David W.
    Colantuoni, Elizabeth
    Mendez-Tellez, Pedro A.
    Sevransky, Jonathan E.
    Shanholtz, Carl
    Himmelfarb, Cheryl R. Dennison
    Desai, Sanjay V.
    Ciesla, Nancy
    Herridge, Margaret S.
    Pronovost, Peter J.
    Needham, Dale M.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (04) : 849 - 859
  • [33] Web-based consultation between general practitioners and nephrologists: a cluster randomized controlled trial
    van Gelder, Vincent A.
    Scherpbier-de Haan, Nynke D.
    van Berkel, Saskia
    Akkermans, Reinier P.
    de Grauw, Inge S.
    Adang, Eddy M.
    Assendelft, Pim J.
    de Grauw, Wim J. C.
    Biermans, Marion C. J.
    Wetzels, Jack F. M.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 34 (04) : 430 - 436
  • [34] Implementation of the Dutch low back pain guideline for general practitioners - A cluster randomized controlled trial
    Engers, AJ
    Wensing, M
    van Tulder, MW
    Timmermans, A
    Oostendorp, RAB
    Koes, BW
    Grol, R
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (06) : 595 - 600
  • [35] Educating Dutch General Practitioners in Dementia Advance Care Planning: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
    Tilburgs, Bram
    Koopmans, Raymond
    Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
    Adang, Eddy
    Schers, Henk
    Teerenstra, Steven
    van de Pol, Marjolein
    Smits, Carolien
    Engels, Yvonne
    Perry, Marieke
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (06) : 837 - +
  • [36] Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial
    McEachan, Rosemary R. C.
    Lawton, Rebecca J.
    Jackson, Cath
    Conner, Mark
    Meads, David M.
    West, Robert M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2011, 8
  • [37] Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial
    Rosemary RC McEachan
    Rebecca J Lawton
    Cath Jackson
    Mark Conner
    David M Meads
    Robert M West
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8
  • [38] A Cluster-Randomized Trial on Small Incentives to Promote Physical Activity
    Kramer, Jan-Niklas
    Tinschert, Peter
    Scholz, Urte
    Fleisch, Elgar
    Kowatsch, Tobias
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 56 (02) : E45 - E54
  • [39] Physical Activity and Skills Intervention: SCORES Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
    Cohen, Kristen E.
    Morgan, Philip J.
    Plotnikoff, Ronald C.
    Callister, Robin
    Lubans, David R.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2015, 47 (04): : 765 - 774
  • [40] A Participatory Physical Activity Intervention in Preschools A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
    De Bock, Freia
    Genser, Bernd
    Raat, Hein
    Fischer, Joachim E.
    Renz-Polster, Herbert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (01) : 64 - 74