Two-Year Longitudinal Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Trial of Physical Activity Promotion by General Practitioners

被引:39
|
作者
Grandes, Gonzalo [1 ]
Sanchez, Alvaro [1 ]
Montoya, Imanol [1 ]
Ortega Sanchez-Pinilla, Ricardo [2 ]
Torcal, Jesus [3 ]
机构
[1] BHS, Primary Care Res Unit Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain
[2] Castilla La Mancha Healthcare Serv, Santa Barbara Primary Care Ctr, Toledo, Spain
[3] Basque Healthcare Serv, Basauri Ariz Primary Care Ctr, Basauri, Spain
来源
PLOS ONE | 2011年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
PRIMARY-CARE; LEISURE-TIME; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0018363
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: We evaluate the effectiveness of a physical activity promotion programme carried out by general practitioners with inactive patients in routine care. Methods and Findings: Pragmatic, cluster randomised clinical trial conducted in eleven public primary care centres in Spain. Fifty-six general practitioners (GPs) were randomly assigned to intervention (29) or standard care (27) groups. They assessed the physical activity level of a systematic sample of patients in routine practice and recruited 4317 individuals (2248 intervention and 2069 control) who did not meet minimum physical activity recommendations. Intervention GPs provided advice to all patients and a physical activity prescription to the subgroup attending an additional appointment (30%). A third of these prescriptions were opportunistically repeated. Control GPs provided standard care. Primary outcome measure was the change in self-reported physical activity from baseline to six, 12 and 24 months. Secondary outcomes included cardiorespiratory fitness and health-related quality of life. A total of 3691 patients (85%) were included in the longitudinal analysis and overall trends over the whole 24 month follow-up were significantly better in the intervention group (p < 0.01). The greatest differences with the control group were observed at six months (adjusted difference 1.7 MET*hr/wk [95% CI, 0.8 to 2.6], 25 min/wk [95% CI, 11.3 to 38.4], and a 5.3% higher percentage of patients meeting minimum recommendations [95% CI: 2.1% to 8.8%] NNT = 19). These differences were not statistically significant at 12 and 24 months. No differences were found in secondary outcomes. A significant difference was maintained until 24 months in the proportion of patients achieving minimum recommendation in the subgroup that received a repeat prescription (adjusted difference 10.2%, 95% CI 1.5% to 19.4%). Conclusions: General practitioners are effective at increasing the level of physical activity among their inactive patients during the initial six-months of an intervention but this effect wears off at 12 and 24 months. Only in the subgroup of patients receiving repeat prescriptions of physical activity is the effect maintained in long-term.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized controlled trial of effectiveness of pedometers on general practitioners' attitudes to engagement in and promotion of physical activity
    James, Ina
    Smith, Andy
    Smith, Teena
    Kirby, Edward
    Press, Philippa
    Doherty, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2009, 27 (07) : 753 - 758
  • [2] Two-year outcomes of Faith in Action/Fe en Accion: a randomized controlled trial of physical activity promotion in Latinas
    Arredondo, Elva M.
    Haughton, Jessica
    Ayala, Guadalupe X.
    Slymen, Donald
    Sallis, James F.
    Perez, Lilian G.
    Serrano, Natalicio
    Ryan, Sherry
    Valdivia, Rodrigo
    Lopez, Nanette, V
    Elder, John P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [3] Two-year outcomes of Faith in Action/Fe en Acción: a randomized controlled trial of physical activity promotion in Latinas
    Elva M. Arredondo
    Jessica Haughton
    Guadalupe X. Ayala
    Donald Slymen
    James F. Sallis
    Lilian G. Perez
    Natalicio Serrano
    Sherry Ryan
    Rodrigo Valdivia
    Nanette V. Lopez
    John P. Elder
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19
  • [4] Barriers to physical activity promotion by general practitioners and practice nurses
    McKenna, J
    Naylor, PJ
    McDowell, N
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 32 (03) : 242 - 247
  • [5] Collaboration of general practitioners and exercise providers in promotion of physical activity a written survey among general practitioners
    Leemrijse, C. J.
    de Bakker, D. H.
    Ooms, L.
    Veenhof, C.
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2015, 16 : 1 - 9
  • [6] Collaboration of general practitioners and exercise providers in promotion of physical activity a written survey among general practitioners
    C. J. Leemrijse
    D. H. de Bakker
    L. Ooms
    C. Veenhof
    BMC Family Practice, 16
  • [7] Energy Balance 4 Kids with Play: Results from a Two-Year Cluster-Randomized Trial
    Madsen, Kristine
    Linchey, Jennifer
    Gerstein, Dana
    Ross, Michelle
    Myers, Esther
    Brown, Katie
    Crawford, Patricia
    CHILDHOOD OBESITY, 2015, 11 (04) : 375 - 383
  • [8] Two-Year, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Belimumab in Lupus Nephritis
    Furie, Richard
    Rovin, Brad H.
    Houssiau, Frederic
    Malvar, Ana
    Teng, Y. K. Onno
    Contreras, Gabriel
    Amoura, Zahir
    Yu, Xueqing
    Mok, Chi-Chiu
    Santiago, Mittermayer B.
    Saxena, Amit
    Green, Yulia
    Ji, Beulah
    Kleoudis, Christi
    Burriss, Susan W.
    Barnett, Carly
    Roth, David A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 383 (12): : 1117 - 1128
  • [9] BELIEFS AND BEHAVIOR OF GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS REGARDING PROMOTION OF PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY
    BULL, FCL
    SCHIPPER, ECC
    JAMROZIK, K
    BLANKSBY, BA
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 19 (03): : 300 - 304
  • [10] Promotion of physical activity in primary care: Knowledge and practice of general practitioners and physiotherapists
    Barrett E.M.
    Darker C.D.
    Hussey J.
    Journal of Public Health, 2013, 21 (1) : 63 - 69