共 50 条
Consensus development of core competencies in intensive and critical care medicine training in China
被引:17
|作者:
Hu, Xiaoyun
[1
]
Xi, Xiuming
[2
]
Ma, Penglin
[3
]
Qiu, Haibo
[4
]
Yu, Kaijiang
[5
]
Tang, Yaoqing
[6
]
Qian, Chuanyun
[7
]
Fang, Qiang
[8
]
Wang, Yushan
[9
]
Yu, Xiangyou
[10
]
Xu, Yuan
[11
]
Du, Bin
[1
]
机构:
[1] Peking Union Med Collage Hosp, Med Intens Care Unit, 1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Fuxing Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Liberat Army, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Hosp 309, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Southeast Univ, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Zhongda Hosp, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Haerbin Med Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Hosp 3, Haerbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[6] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, RuiJin Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[7] Kunming Med Univ, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Hosp 1, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[8] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Hosp 1, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[9] Jilin Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Hosp 1, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[10] Xinjiang Med Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Hosp 1, Urumqi, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
[11] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源:
关键词:
Intensive care;
Critical care;
Training;
Core competence;
Delphi;
Nominal group;
HEALTH-SERVICES;
D O I:
10.1186/s13054-016-1514-z
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Background: The aim of this study is to develop consensus on core competencies required for postgraduate training in intensive care medicine. Methods: We used a combination of a modified Delphi method and a nominal group technique to create and modify the list of core competencies to ensure maximum consensus. Ideas were generated modified from Competency Based Training in Intensive Care Medicine in Europe collaboration (CoBaTrICE) core competencies. An online survey invited healthcare professionals, educators, and trainees to rate and comment on these competencies. The output from the online survey was edited and then reviewed by a nominal group of 13 intensive care professionals to identify each competence for importance. The resulting list was then recirculated in the nominal group for iterative rating. Results: The online survey yielded a list of 199 competencies for nominal group reviewing. After five rounds of rating, 129 competencies entered the final set defined as core competencies. Conclusions: We have generated a set of core competencies using a consensus technique which can serve as an indicator for training program development.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文