Phase II trial of cetuximab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent squamous or non-squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

被引:93
|
作者
Santin, Alessandro D. [1 ]
Sill, Michael W. [2 ,3 ]
McMeekin, D. Scott [4 ]
Leitao, Mario M., Jr. [5 ]
Brown, Jubilee [6 ]
Sutton, Gregory P. [7 ]
Van Le, Linda [8 ]
Griffin, Patricia [9 ]
Boardman, Cecelia H. [10 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Gynecol Oncol Grp, Stat & Data Ctr, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Biostat, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] St Vincent Hosp, Indianapolis, IN USA
[8] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[9] Upstate Carolina CCOP, Spartanburg, SC USA
[10] Virginia Commonwealth Univ Hlth Syst, Massey Canc Ctr, Richmond, VA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cervical neoplasms; Cetuximab; EGFR; Immunotherapy; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; UTERINE CERVIX; COLORECTAL-CANCER; IN-VIVO; ANTITUMOR-ACTIVITY; TARGETED THERAPY; TYROSINE KINASE; IMMUNE FUNCTION; BRAF MUTATIONS; KRAS MUTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.040
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (COG) conducted a phase II trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the anti-EGER antibody cetuximab. in persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. Patients and methods. Eligible patients had cervical cancer, measurable disease, and COG performance status <= 2.Treatment consisted of cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) initial dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PES) at 6 months and response. The study used a 2-stage group sequential design. Results. Thirty-eight patients were entered with 3 exclusions. leaving 35 evaluable for analysis. Thirty-one patients (88.6%) received prior radiation as well as either 1 (n =25. 71.4%) or 2 (n = 10) prior cytotoxic regimens. Twenty-four patients (68.6%) had a squamous cell carcinoma. Grade 3 adverse events possibly related to cetuximab included dermatologic (n = 5), Cl (n =4). anemia (n = 2). constitutional (n= 3), infection (n= 2), vascular (n = 2), pain (n = 2). and pulmonary, neurological, vomiting and metabolic (n = 1 each). No clinical responses were detected. Five patients (14.3%; two-sided 90% Cl, 5.8% to 30%) survived without progression for at least 6 months. The median PES and overall survival (OS) times were 1.97 and 6.7 months, respectively. In this study, all patients with PFS at 6 months harbored tumors with squamous cell histology. Conclusion. Cetuximab is well tolerated but has limited activity in this population. Cetuximab activity may be limited to patients with squamous cell histology. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 500
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of gemcitabine in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A Phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group
    Schilder, RJ
    Blessing, JA
    Morgan, M
    Mangan, CE
    Rader, JS
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 76 (02) : 204 - 207
  • [32] A randomized phase II evaluation of bryostatin-1 (NSC #339555) in persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
    Deborah K. Armstrong
    John A. Blessing
    Janet Rader
    Joel I. Sorosky
    Investigational New Drugs, 2003, 21 : 453 - 457
  • [33] A randomized phase II evaluation of bryostatin-1 (NSC #339555) in persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
    Armstrong, DK
    Blessing, JA
    Rader, J
    Sorosky, JI
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2003, 21 (04) : 453 - 457
  • [34] A phase II trial of didemnin B (NSC #335319) in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix a gynecologic oncology group study - A gynecologic oncology group study
    Malfetano, JH
    Blessing, JA
    Homesley, HD
    Look, KY
    McGehee, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 19 (02): : 184 - 186
  • [35] PHASE-II TRIAL OF MENOGARIL IN PATIENTS WITH SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX - A GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY
    SUTTON, GP
    BLESSING, JA
    BARRETT, RJ
    GALLUP, DG
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1994, 52 (02) : 229 - 231
  • [36] Phase III study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A gynecologic oncology group study
    Moore, DH
    Blessing, JA
    McQuellon, RP
    Thaler, HT
    Cella, D
    Benda, J
    Miller, DS
    Olt, G
    King, S
    Boggess, JF
    Rocereto, TF
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (15) : 3113 - 3119
  • [37] A phase II evaluation of brivanib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study
    Chan, John K.
    Deng, Wei
    Higgins, Robert V.
    Tewari, Krishnansu S.
    Bonebrake, Albert J.
    Hicks, Michael
    Gaillard, Stephanie
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Chafe, Weldon
    Monk, Bradley J.
    Aghajanian, Carol
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 146 (03) : 554 - 559
  • [38] PHASE-II TRIAL OF PIPERAZINEDIONE (NCS135758) IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED OR RECURRENT SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX - A GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY
    THIGPEN, JT
    BLESSING, J
    HOMESLEY, HD
    ADCOCK, LL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1983, 6 (04): : 423 - 426
  • [39] Phase II evaluation of oxaliplatin in previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study
    Fracasso, PM
    Blessing, JA
    Wolf, J
    Rocereto, TF
    Berek, JS
    Waggoner, S
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (01) : 177 - 180
  • [40] CIS-PLATINUM IN TREATMENT OF ADVANCED OR RECURRENT SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX - A PHASE-II STUDY OF THE GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP
    THIGPEN, T
    SHINGLETON, H
    HOMESLEY, H
    LAGASSE, L
    BLESSING, J
    CANCER, 1981, 48 (04) : 899 - 903