Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire - Brief Version (PQ-B)

被引:333
|
作者
Loewy, Rachel L. [1 ]
Pearson, Rahel [1 ]
Vinogradov, Sophia [1 ,2 ]
Bearden, Carrie E. [3 ,4 ]
Cannon, Tyrone D. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, San Francisco Dept, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychiat & Biobehav Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
Assessment; Prodrome; Psychosis; Schizophrenia; Ultra-high-risk; ULTRA-HIGH-RISK; SELF-REPORT; DSM-V; EXPERIENCES; POPULATION; VALIDATION; DISORDERS; INCLUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.029
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
In this study, we examined the preliminary concurrent validity of a brief version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-B), a self-report screening measure for psychosis risk syndromes. Adolescents and young adults (N=141) who presented consecutively for clinical assessment to one of two early psychosis research clinics at the University of California, San Francisco and UC Los Angeles completed the PQ-B and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) at intake. Endorsement of three or more positive symptoms on the PQ-B differentiated between those with prodromal syndrome and psychotic syndrome diagnoses on the SIPS versus those with no SIPS diagnoses with 89% sensitivity, 58% specificity, and a positive Likelihood Ratio of 2.12. A Distress Score measuring the distress or impairment associated with endorsed positive symptoms increased the specificity to 68%, while retaining similar sensitivity of 88%. Agreement was very similar when participants with psychotic syndromes were excluded from the analyses. These results suggest that the PQ-B may be used as an effective, efficient self-report screen for prodromal psychosis syndromes when followed by diagnostic interview, in a two-stage evaluation process in help-seeking populations. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 46
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Validity of the 16-Item Version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) to Screen for Ultra High Risk of Developing Psychosis in the General Help-Seeking Population
    Ising, Helga K.
    Veling, Wim
    Loewy, Rachel L.
    Rietveld, Marleen W.
    Rietdijk, Judith
    Dragt, Sara
    Klaassen, Rianne M. C.
    Nieman, Dorien H.
    Wunderink, Lex
    Linszen, Don H.
    van der Gaag, Mark
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2012, 38 (06) : 1288 - 1296
  • [22] Translation and validation study of the prodromal questionnaire brief version into Indonesian language
    Kaligis, Fransiska
    Marsubrin, Raden Irawati Ismail
    Wiguna, Tjhin
    Noorhana, S. W.
    Almasyhur, Alfi Fajar
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 37 : 96 - 101
  • [23] Deconstruction of a screening questionnaire for prodromal psychosis to reduce false positive responses
    Sengutta, Mary
    Karow, Anne
    Moritz, Steffen
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2021, 232 : 107 - 108
  • [24] Psychosis risk screening: Validation of the youth psychosis at-risk questionnaire - brief in a community-derived sample of adolescents
    Fonseca-Pedrero, Eduardo
    Ortuno-Sierra, Javier
    Chocarro, Edurne
    Inchausti, Felix
    Debbane, Martin
    Bobes, Julio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (04)
  • [25] DEVELOPMENT OF A BRIEF SELF-REPORT QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SCREENING THE AT RISK STATE OF PSYCHOSIS IN TAIWAN
    Liu, Chen-Chung
    Tien, Yin-Jin
    Chen, Chun-Houh
    Hwu, Hai-Gwo
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2010, 117 (2-3) : 185 - 185
  • [26] Validation of the Korean Version of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version in Non-Help-Seeking Individuals
    Jang, Young Eun
    Lee, Tae Young
    Hur, Ji-Won
    Kwon, Jun Soo
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 16 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [27] Reliability of the italian version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (iPQ-16) for psychosis risk screening in a young help-seeking community sample
    Azzali, S.
    Pelizza, L.
    Paterlini, F.
    Garlassi, S.
    Scazza, I.
    Chiri, L. R.
    Poletti, M.
    Fontana, F.
    Favazzo, R.
    Barbanti, S. V.
    Fabiani, M.
    Pensieri, L.
    Cioncolini, L.
    Semrov, E.
    Raballo, A.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 24 (01): : 16 - 23
  • [28] Addressing the elephant in the screening room: an item response theory analysis of the Prodromal Questionnaire for at-risk symptoms of psychosis
    Gauld, Christophe
    Fourneret, Pierre
    Alderson-Day, Ben
    Palmer-Cooper, Emma
    Donde, Clement
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2025, 47
  • [29] Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
    Bernstein, DP
    Stein, JA
    Newcomb, MD
    Walker, E
    Pogge, D
    Ahluvalia, T
    Stokes, J
    Handelsman, L
    Medrano, M
    Desmond, D
    Zule, W
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2003, 27 (02) : 169 - 190
  • [30] Reliability and discriminant validity of the Slovak version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) in a student sample
    Januska, Jakub
    Strakova, Alexandra
    Turcek, Michal
    Vaseckova, Barbora
    Forgacova, Lubica
    Heretik, Anton
    Pecenak, Jan
    Hajduk, Michal
    PSYCHOSIS-PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES, 2022, 14 (02): : 131 - 142