Effect of IV Push Antibiotic Administration on Antibiotic Therapy Delays in Sepsis

被引:14
|
作者
Gregorowicz, Alex J. [1 ]
Costello, Patrick G. [1 ]
Gajdosik, David A. [2 ]
Purakal, John [3 ]
Pettit, Natasha N. [1 ]
Bastow, Samantha [1 ]
Ward, Michael A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago Med, Dept Pharm, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Dept Pharm, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Emergency Med, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Emergency Med, Med Ctr, Madison, WI 53715 USA
关键词
administration; antibiotics; intravenous; push; sepsis; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000004430
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: Timeliness of antibiotic administration is recognized as an important factor in reducing mortality associated with sepsis. According to guidelines, antibiotics should be administered within 1 hour of sepsis presentation and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services mandates administration within 3 hours. This study evaluates the difference in time from sepsis diagnosis to first-dose completion of beta-lactam antibiotics between IV push and IV piggyback administration. Design: Single-center, retrospective analysis. Setting: Urban, tertiary-care emergency department. Patients: Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) adult patients (n= 274) diagnosed with severe sepsis or septic shock per Sepsis-2 criteria from September to November 2016 and from September to November 2017 and 2) received beta-lactam antibiotic. Interventions: Initial beta-lactam agent administered as either IV push or IV piggyback. Measurements and Main Results: Median time (interquartile range) from sepsis diagnosis to administration of a beta-lactam antibiotic was 48 minutes (19-96 min) versus 72 minutes (8-180 min) and to administration of the complete broad-spectrum regimen was 108 minutes (66-144 min) versus 114 minutes (42-282 min) in the IV push (n= 143) versus IV piggyback (n= 131) groups, respectively. When controlling for time to sepsis diagnosis and other factors, IV push was associated with approximately 32-minute time savings to beta-lactam (beta= -0.60; 95% CI, -0.91 to -0.29) and approximately 32-minute time savings to broad-spectrum (beta= -0.32; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.02) antibiotic administrations. The IV push group was less likely to fail the goal of beta-lactam antibiotics within 1 hour (44.6% vs 57.3%; odds ratio, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.34-3.86) and 3 hours (7.6% vs 24.5%; odds ratio, 4.31; 95% CI, 2.01-10.28) of sepsis diagnosis compared with IV piggyback. The IV push strategy did not affect mortality, need for ICU admission, or ICU length of stay. No adverse events, including infusion reactions, were found in either arm. Conclusions: Use of an IV push strategy may safely facilitate more rapid administration of beta-lactam antibiotics and may allow for better compliance with sepsis management guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1179
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of emergency antibiotic administration time on patients with sepsis
    Althunayyan, Sager M.
    Aljanoubi, Mohammed A.
    Alghadeer, Sultan M.
    Alharthi, Musab Z.
    Alotaibi, Raied N.
    Mubarak, Abdullah M.
    Almutary, Abektkaiz M.
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 42 (09) : 1002 - 1008
  • [22] Lack of effect of combination antibiotic therapy on mortality in patients with pneumococcal sepsis
    Harbarth, S
    Garbino, J
    Pugin, J
    Romand, JA
    Pittet, D
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 24 (10) : 688 - 690
  • [23] Timings of antibiotic administration for patients with sepsis in the emergency department
    Pugh, E.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 : 37 - 37
  • [24] Appropriate and timely antibiotic administration for neonatal sepsis in Mesoamerica
    Duber, Herbert C.
    Hartford, Emily A.
    Schaefer, Alexandra M.
    Johanns, Casey K.
    Colombara, Danny V.
    Iriarte, Emma
    Palmisano, Erin B.
    Rios-Zertuche, Diego
    Zuniga-Brenes, Paola
    Hernandez-Prado, Bernardo
    Mokdad, Ali H.
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 3 (03):
  • [25] Timing Of Antibiotic Administration And Outcomes Of Patients With Nosocomial Sepsis
    Vazquez, C.
    Prono, M. V. Dioverti
    Fortis, S.
    Yalamanchili, H.
    Tiniakou, E.
    Salas, V.
    Chalkias, S.
    Florindez-Ullilen, J. A.
    Xexemeku, F.
    Amoateng-Adjepong, Y.
    Manthous, C. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 183
  • [26] Predictors Of Early Antibiotic Administration In Patients Suspected Of Sepsis
    Husain, A. A.
    Ahmed, A. O.
    Amin, O. I.
    Berger, M.
    Tomazic-Allen, S.
    Brown, M.
    Sevransky, J. E.
    Martin, G. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [27] Surviving sepsis in the era of antibiotic resistance: Are there any alternative approaches to antibiotic therapy?
    Uppu, Divakara S. S. M.
    Ghosh, Chandradhish
    Haldar, Jayanta
    MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS, 2015, 80 : 7 - 13
  • [28] ANTIBIOTIC ADMINISTRATION DURING RADIATION THERAPY
    BARNARD, RD
    ORENS, LR
    NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1951, 51 (23) : 2797 - 2798
  • [29] ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY OF NEONATES WITH BACTERIAL SEPSIS
    EDWARDS, MS
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1995, 14 (02) : 166 - 167
  • [30] Sepsis: frontiers in diagnosis, resuscitation and antibiotic therapy
    Anders Perner
    Anthony C. Gordon
    Daniel De Backer
    George Dimopoulos
    James A. Russell
    Jeffrey Lipman
    Jens-Ulrik Jensen
    John Myburgh
    Mervyn Singer
    Rinaldo Bellomo
    Timothy Walsh
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2016, 42 : 1958 - 1969