Large eddy simulations of turbulent flames using the filtered density function model

Large eddy simulations (LES) of the Sandia/Sydney swirl burners (SM1 and SMA1) and the Sandia/Darmstadt piloted jet diffusion flame (Flame D) are performed. These flames are part of the database of turbulent reacting flows widely considered as benchmark test cases for validating turbulent-combustion models. In the simulations presented in this paper, the subgrid scale (SGS) closure model adopted for turbulence-chemistry interactions is based on the transport filtered density function (FDF) model. In the FDF model, the transport equation for the joint probability density function (PDF) of scalars is solved. The main advantage of this model is that the filtered reaction rates can be exactly computed. However, the density field, computed directly from the FDF solver and needed in the hydrodynamic equations, is noisy and causes numerical instability. Two numerical approaches that yield a smooth density field are examined. The two methods are based on transport equations for specific sensible enthalpy (h(s)) and RT, where R is the gas constant and T is the temperature. Consistency of the two methods is assessed in a bluff-body configuration using Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methodology in conjunction with the transported PDF method. It is observed that the h(s) method is superior to the RT method. Both methods are used in LES of the SM1 burner. In the near field-region, the h(s) method produces better predictions of temperature. However, in the far-field region, both methods show deviation from data. Simulations of the SMA1 burner and Flame D are also presented using the h(s) method. Some deficiencies are seen in the predictions of the SMA1 burner that may be related to the simple chemical kinetics model and mixing model used in the simulations. Simulations of Flame D show good agreement with data. These results indicate that, while further improvements to the methodology are needed, the LES/FDF method has the potential to accurately predict complex turbulent flames. (C) 2006 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.