Whole genome comparative analysis of four Georgian grape cultivars

被引:12
|
作者
Tabidze, V. [1 ]
Pipia, I. [1 ]
Gogniashvili, M. [1 ]
Kunelauri, N. [1 ]
Ujmajuridze, L. [2 ]
Pirtskhalava, M. [3 ]
Vishnepolsky, B. [3 ]
Hernandez, A. G. [4 ]
Fields, C. J. [5 ]
Beridze, Tengiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ Georgia, Inst Mol Genet, 240 David Aghmashenebeli Alley, Tbilisi 0159, Georgia
[2] Agr Sci Res Ctr, 6 Marshal Gelovani Ave, Tbilisi 0159, Georgia
[3] Ivane Beritashvili Ctr Expt Biomed, Gotua St 14, Tbilisi 0160, Georgia
[4] Univ Illinois, Roy J Carver Biotechnol Ctr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[5] Univ Illinois, High Performance Comp Biol, Roy J Carver Biotechnol Ctr, Carl R Woese Inst Genom Biol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Grape; Nuclear DNA; Mitochondrial DNA; Illumina; Sequencing; SNP; DNA-SEQUENCE DIVERSITY; VITIS-VINIFERA; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA; INTROGRESSION; ALIGNMENT; NUCLEAR; FORMAT;
D O I
10.1007/s00438-017-1353-x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Grapevine is the one of the most important fruit species in the world. Comparative genome sequencing of grape cultivars is very important for the interpretation of the grape genome and understanding its evolution. The genomes of four Georgian grape cultivars-Chkhaveri, Saperavi, Meskhetian green, and Rkatsiteli, belonging to different haplogroups, were resequenced. The shotgun genomic libraries of grape cultivars were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq. Pinot Noir nuclear, mitochondrial, and chloroplast DNA were used as reference. Mitochondrial DNA of Chkhaveri closely matches that of the reference Pinot noir mitochondrial DNA, with the exception of 16 SNPs found in the Chkhaveri mitochondrial DNA. The number of SNPs in mitochondrial DNA from Saperavi, Meskhetian green, and Rkatsiteli was 764, 702, and 822, respectively. Nuclear DNA differs from the reference by 1,800,675 nt in Chkhaveri, 1,063,063 nt in Meskhetian green, 2,174,995 in Saperavi, and 5,011,513 in Rkatsiteli. Unlike mtDNA Pinot noir, chromosomal DNA is closer to the Meskhetian green than to other cultivars. Substantial differences in the number of SNPs in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA of Chkhaveri and Pinot noir cultivars are explained by backcrossing or introgression of their wild predecessors before or during the process of domestication. Annotation of chromosomal DNA of Georgian grape cultivars by MEGANTE, a web-based annotation system, shows 66,745 predicted genes (Chkhaveri-17,409; Saperavi-17,021; Meskhetian green-18,355; and Rkatsiteli-13,960). Among them, 106 predicted genes and 43 pseudogenes of terpene synthase genes were found in chromosomes 12, 18 random (18R), and 19. Four novel TPS genes not present in reference Pinot noir DNA were detected. Two of them-germacrene A synthase (Chromosome 18R) and (-) germacrene D synthase (Chromosome 19) can be identified as putatively full-length proteins. This work performs the first attempt of the comparative whole genome analysis of different haplogroups of Vitis vinifera cultivars. Based on complete nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis, hypothetical phylogeny scheme of formation of grape cultivars is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / 1389
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative phenotypic and transcriptomic analysis of Victoria and flame seedless grape cultivars during berry ripening
    Zhong, Haixia
    Zhang, Fuchun
    Pan, Mingqi
    Wu, Xinyu
    Zhang, Wen
    Han, Shouan
    Xie, Hui
    Zhou, Xiaoming
    Wang, Min
    Ai, Caikasimu Maikeer
    He, Tianming
    FEBS OPEN BIO, 2020, 10 (12): : 2616 - 2630
  • [22] Comparative Analysis of Cuticular Wax in Various Grape Cultivars During Berry Development and After Storage
    Zhang, Mengwei
    Zhang, Peian
    Lu, Suwen
    Ou-yang, Qixia
    Zhu-ge, Yaxian
    Tian, Ruiping
    Jia, Haifeng
    Fang, Jinggui
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2021, 8
  • [23] Comparative Analysis of Structural and Functional Properties of Dietary Fiber from Four Grape Varieties
    Chang, Yingying
    An, Ran
    Sun, Sijie
    Hou, Min
    Han, Fuliang
    Song, Shiren
    MOLECULES, 2024, 29 (11):
  • [24] WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING AND COMPARATIVE GENOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE STREPTOCOCCUS MILLERI GROUP
    Olson, A. B.
    Sibley, C. D.
    Ouellette, C.
    Tyson, S.
    Graham, M.
    Grinwis, M. E.
    Kent, H.
    Mabon, P.
    Tyler, S. D.
    Van Domselaar, G.
    Surette, M. G.
    Corbett, C. R.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2009, : 335 - 335
  • [25] Whole Genome Sequences of Four Brucella Strains
    Ding, Jiabo
    Pan, Yuanlong
    Jiang, Hai
    Cheng, Junsheng
    Liu, Taotao
    Qin, Nan
    Yang, Yi
    Cui, Buyun
    Chen, Chen
    Liu, Cuihua
    Mao, Kairong
    Zhu, Baoli
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2011, 193 (14) : 3674 - 3675
  • [26] Comparative whole genome analysis of three consecutive Salmonella diarizonae isolates
    Gerlach, Roman G.
    Walter, Steffi
    McClelland, Michael
    Schmidt, Christiane
    Steglich, Matthias
    Prager, Rita
    Bender, Jennifer K.
    Fuchs, Stephan
    Schoerner, Christoph
    Rabsch, Wolfgang
    Lang, Werner
    Jantsch, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 307 (08) : 542 - 551
  • [27] Comparative whole genome transcriptome analysis of three Plasmodium falciparum strains
    Llinás, M
    Bozdech, Z
    Wong, ED
    Adai, AT
    DeRisi, JL
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2006, 34 (04) : 1166 - 1173
  • [28] Whole Genome Assembly, Annotation, and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Pandanus amaryllifolius
    Sidek, Norhafizah
    Tan, Boon Chin
    Mebus, Katharina
    Kikuchi, Shinji
    Teo, Chee How
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER, 2024,
  • [29] Comparative analysis of algorithms for whole-genome assembly of pyrosequencing data
    Finotello, Francesca
    Lavezzo, Enrico
    Fontana, Paolo
    Peruzzo, Denis
    Albiero, Alessandro
    Barzon, Luisa
    Falda, Marco
    Di Camillo, Barbara
    Toppo, Stefano
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 13 (03) : 269 - 280
  • [30] Combo: a whole genome comparative browser
    Engels, Reinhard
    Yu, Tamara
    Burge, Chris
    Mesirov, Jill P.
    DeCaprio, David
    Galagan, James E.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2006, 22 (14) : 1782 - 1783