Development of statistical and machine learning models to predict the occurrence of radiation fog in Japan

被引:7
|
作者
Negishi, Momoko [1 ,3 ]
Kusaka, Hiroyuki [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Life & Environm Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[2] Univ Tsukuba, Ctr Computat Sci, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058577, Japan
[3] Franklin Japan Corp, Chuo Ku, 1-1-12 Miyashimo, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520212, Japan
关键词
AIC; discriminant model; logistic regression model; radiation fog; SVM; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; STRATUS; PHYSICS; EVENT; EVOLUTION; BASIN; WRF;
D O I
10.1002/met.2048
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This study develops statistical and machine learning models based on discriminant analysis, logistic regression analysis, and a support vector machine (SVM) to predict the occurrence of radiation fog in Japan. The selection of a suitable set of explanatory variables for the models was made using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The accuracies of the three models were measured and compared. To determine the optimum combination of explanatory variables, temperature, humidity, wind speed, precipitation, sunshine, and visibility data were considered. Based on the root mean square error (RMSE) and AIC values, the best combination of variables was found to include: the presence of precipitation, mean wind speed during the night, minimum temperature during the night, the amount of temperature cooling during the night, the minimum humidity during the previous day, and visibility at 18:00. A comparison of the predictive accuracies of the three models using the selected variable combination showed that the discriminant model produced a critical success index (CSI, or threat score) of 22.5, while the logistic regression model and the SVM model both produced better CSI results-with scores of 33.8 and 38.2, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Machine Learning Models to Predict Twitter Buzz
    Parikh, Yash
    Abdelfattah, Eman
    2019 IEEE 10TH ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2019, : 69 - 73
  • [42] Assessing Hydrological Simulations with Machine Learning and Statistical Models
    Rozos, Evangelos
    HYDROLOGY, 2023, 10 (02)
  • [43] Statistical and machine learning models for predicting spalling in CRCP
    Al-Khateeb, Ghazi G.
    Alnaqbi, Ali
    Zeiada, Waleed
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [44] FORECASTING UNDER APPLYING MACHINE LEARNING AND STATISTICAL MODELS
    Elhag, Azhari A.
    Abu-Zinadah, Hanaa
    Elhag, Azhari A. (a.alhag@tu.edu.sa), 1600, Serbian Society of Heat Transfer Engineers (24):
  • [45] FORECASTING UNDER APPLYING MACHINE LEARNING AND STATISTICAL MODELS
    Elhag, Azhari A.
    Abu-Zinadah, Hanaa
    THERMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 24 : S131 - S137
  • [46] Statistical quantification of confounding bias in machine learning models
    Spisak, Tamas
    GIGASCIENCE, 2022, 11
  • [47] The development and deployment of machine learning models
    Pruneski, James A.
    Williams, Riley J., III
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Ramkumar, Prem N.
    Kiapour, Ata M.
    Martin, R. Kyle
    Karlsson, Jon
    Pareek, Ayoosh
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (12) : 3917 - 3923
  • [48] The development and deployment of machine learning models
    James A. Pruneski
    Riley J. Williams
    Benedict U. Nwachukwu
    Prem N. Ramkumar
    Ata M. Kiapour
    R. Kyle Martin
    Jón Karlsson
    Ayoosh Pareek
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2022, 30 : 3917 - 3923
  • [49] Lifecycle Models in Machine Learning Development
    Crespi, Antonio
    Mesquida, Antoni-Lluis
    Monserrat, Maria
    Mas, Antonia
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2025, 42 (04)
  • [50] Metabolic dysfunctions predict the development of Alzheimer's disease: Statistical and machine learning analysis of EMR data
    Liu, Rex
    Durbin-Johnson, Blythe
    Paciotti, Brian
    Liu, Albert T.
    Weakley, Alyssa
    Liu, Xin
    Wan, Yu-Jui Yvonne
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2024, 20 (10) : 6765 - 6775