The Effects of Adhesive Type and Thickness on Stress Distribution in Molars Restored with All-Ceramic Crowns

被引:47
|
作者
Liu, Bin [4 ]
Lu, Chenglin [4 ]
Wu, Yanling [3 ]
Zhang, Xiuyin [3 ]
Arola, Dwayne [2 ]
Zhang, Dongsheng [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Dept Mech, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Dept Prosthodont, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ, Shanghai Inst Appl Math & Mech, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
All-ceramic crown; cement; stress; FEA; SHEAR BOND STRENGTH; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; 3 RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE-TREATMENT; LUTING CEMENTS; DENTIN; ENAMEL; AGENTS; TOOTH; RESTORATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00650.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study investigated the effects of luting cement type and thickness on the stress distribution within all-ceramic crowns using finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: An all-ceramic crown restoration of the mandibular right first molar was prepared according to standard dental processes and scanned using micro-computed tomography. Eight 3D FE models were then developed that accounted for two adhesive systems, each with cement thickness of 60 mu m, 90 mu m, 120 mu m, and 150 mu m. The models were subjected to four loading conditions, and stresses in the veneer and core layers were evaluated. Results: The stress distribution and maximum stresses in the veneer, core, and cement are presented in corresponding loading conditions. The cement with higher elastic modulus resulted in lower tensile stresses in the veneer and core layers, and the shear strength of the cement was critical to the intactness of the all-ceramic crown. Conclusion: The cement thickness acts as a cushion between the crown and dentin substrate. Although there is an optimal thickness (approximately 90 mu m) that can reduce the stress level in ceramic crowns, cement thickness is not very important to stresses in the core or veneer in most cases when compared to the influence of loading conditions or cement moduli.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 44
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE MECHANICAL STRENGTH AND MICROSTRUCTURE OF ALL-CERAMIC CROWNS
    PIDDOCK, V
    MARQUIS, PM
    WILSON, HJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1987, 15 (04) : 153 - 158
  • [32] Microleakage of contemporary all-ceramic crowns.
    Attia, A
    Abdelaziz, KM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 455 - 455
  • [33] EFFECT OF CEMENTS ON THE STRENGTH OF ALL-CERAMIC CROWNS
    MANTE, FK
    PHILLIPS, K
    KOROSTOFF, E
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 39 - 39
  • [34] Materials design in the performance of all-ceramic crowns
    Lawn, BR
    Pajares, A
    Zhang, Y
    Deng, Y
    Polack, MA
    Lloyd, IK
    Rekow, ED
    Thompson, VP
    BIOMATERIALS, 2004, 25 (14) : 2885 - 2892
  • [35] Fabrication of all-ceramic crowns by a new method
    Masuda, Takayuki
    Kakimoto, Kazutoshi
    Takahashi, Kazuya
    Komasa, Yutaka
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2016, 35 (02) : 290 - 297
  • [36] Computer modeling of stress-deformation state of all-ceramic crowns.
    Lebedenko, A
    Zolotnitsky, I
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 232 - 232
  • [37] Fracture resistance of endodontically treated canines restored with different sizes of fiber post and all-ceramic crowns
    Turker, Sebnem Begum
    Alkumru, Hasan Necdet
    Akalin, Buket
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2016, 8 (02): : 158 - 166
  • [38] Fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns based on different preparation designs for restoring endodontically treated molars
    Krance, Aaron
    DuVall, Nicholas
    Brewster, John
    Roberts, Howard
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 31 (01) : 72 - 79
  • [39] Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
    Pan, Chin-Yun
    Lan, Ting-Hsun
    Liu, Pao-Hsin
    Fu, Wan-Ru
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (05)
  • [40] Cyclic loading of OPC all-ceramic crowns.
    Azer, SS
    Drummond, JL
    Campbell, SD
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 343 - 343