mFOLFOXIRI versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Ding, Miaomiao [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jianwei [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Huabin [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Ling, Jiayu [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Zehua [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jianxia [1 ,2 ]
Li, Weiwei [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Yanhong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Prov Key Lab Colorectal & Pelv Floor Di, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Locally advanced rectal cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; mFOLFOXIRI; mFOLFOX6; Propensity score matching; METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER; FOLFOXIRI PLUS BEVACIZUMAB; MEDIAN FOLLOW-UP; PHASE-III TRIAL; OPEN-LABEL; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; MULTICENTER; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.clcc.2021.11.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, CRT failed to impact metastatic recurrence and the risk of side effects on bowel and genitourinary remained a concern. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone with mFOLFOX6 or FOLFOXIRI had been investigated in LARC. Here, we tried to compare the efficacy of mFOLFOXIRI with mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LARC. Patients and Methods: Between January 2014 and December 2019, patients with LARC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOX6 were retrospective analyzed, including data from a prospective trial (NCT02217020). All patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME). The propensity-score matching was preformed to adjust baseline potential confounders and to estimate differences in outcomes between patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional regression analysis. Results: The median follow-up time was 31.1 months. After propensity score matching, 156 patients were available for comparison in each group. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 17.9% vs. 5.1% (P< .001), the incidence rate of anastomotic fistula was 3.2% vs. 9% (P = .03), the 3 year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 75% vs. 66.7% (P = .047) and the distant metastasis rate was 16.4% versus 26.6% (P = .013) for mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6 group, respectively. Patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI had higher incidence of grade Ill and/or IV nausea and/or vomiting (7.6% vs. 2.5%, P = .04). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI regimens improved pCR rate and survival outcome, reduced the rate of distant metastasis and anastomotic fistula when comparing with propensityscore matched controls of mFOLFOX6 neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MicroAbstract: This trial assessed the shortterm and long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6 in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Comparing with propensity-score matched historical control of chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy was well tolerated and led to higher rates of 3 year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:E12 / E20
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Postoperative morbidity and mortality after neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Wu, Liucheng
    Ge, Lianying
    Qin, Yuzhou
    Huang, Mingwei
    Chen, Jiansi
    Yang, Yang
    Zhong, Jianhong
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 6011 - 6018
  • [22] Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis
    Zeng, Wei
    Liu, Yi
    Wang, Chuandong
    Yang, Changshun
    Lin, Shengtao
    Li, Weihua
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (11):
  • [23] Randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of SOX versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (KSCC1301)
    Keisuke Miwa
    Eiji Oki
    Masanobu Enomoto
    Keisuke Ihara
    Koji Ando
    Fumihiko Fujita
    Masahiro Tominaga
    Shinichiro Mori
    Goro Nakayama
    Mototsugu Shimokawa
    Hiroshi Saeki
    Hideo Baba
    Masaki Mori
    Yoshito Akagi
    BMC Cancer, 21
  • [24] Randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of SOX versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (KSCC1301)
    Miwa, Keisuke
    Oki, Eiji
    Enomoto, Masanobu
    Ihara, Keisuke
    Ando, Koji
    Fujita, Fumihiko
    Tominaga, Masahiro
    Mori, Shinichiro
    Nakayama, Goro
    Shimokawa, Mototsugu
    Saeki, Hiroshi
    Baba, Hideo
    Mori, Masaki
    Akagi, Yoshito
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [25] Totally neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with mFOLFOX6 in locally advanced rectal cancer: A single arm phase II study (FOTAC).
    Zhang, Jianwei
    Cai, Yue
    Hu, Huabin
    Xiao, Jian
    Chen, Dianke
    Ling, Jiayu
    Huang, Meijin
    Wang, Lei
    Kang, Liang
    Lan, Ping
    Wang, Jianping
    Deng, Yanhong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04)
  • [26] Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI versus mFOLFOX6 in MRD-positive stage II-III colorectal cancer
    Zhang, Jianwei
    Hu, Huabin
    Cai, Yue
    Xie, Xiaoyu
    Wu, Zehua
    Ling, Jiayu
    Chen, Dianke
    Liu, Ping
    Kang, Liang
    Deng, Yanhong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [27] Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Sugimura, Keijiro
    Motoori, Masaaki
    Kentaro, Kishi
    Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi
    Takeno, Atsushi
    Hara, Hisashi
    Hamakawa, Takuya
    Murakami, Kohei
    Nakahara, Yujiro
    Masuzawa, Toru
    Omori, Takeshi
    Kurokawa, Yukinori
    Fujitani, Kazumasa
    Doki, Yuichiro
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 39 (04): : 2304 - 2315
  • [28] Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Keijiro Sugimura
    Masaaki Motoori
    Kishi Kentaro
    Kazuyoshi Yamamoto
    Atsushi Takeno
    Hisashi Hara
    Takuya Hamakawa
    Kohei Murakami
    Yujiro Nakahara
    Toru Masuzawa
    Takeshi Omori
    Yukinori Kurokawa
    Kazumasa Fujitani
    Yuichiro Doki
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2025, 39 (4) : 2304 - 2315
  • [29] Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Huaqin Lin
    Lei Wang
    Xiaohong Zhong
    Xueqing Zhang
    Lingdong Shao
    Junxin Wu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 19
  • [30] Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Lin, Huaqin
    Wang, Lei
    Zhong, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Xueqing
    Shao, Lingdong
    Wu, Junxin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)