Difficulty Index of Examinations and Their Relation to the Achievement of Programme Outcomes

被引:20
|
作者
Johari, Juridah [1 ]
Sahari, Jaafar [1 ]
Abd Wahab, Dzuraidah [1 ]
Abdullah, Shahrum [1 ]
Abdullah, Shahrir [1 ]
Omar, Mohd Zaidi [1 ]
Muhamad, Norhamidi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Ukm Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
Difficulty Index; Programme Outcomes (PO); Engineering Courses;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.011
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Verifications on the achievement of programme outcomes in engineering programmes is a key requirement in the accreditation of such programmes. Various methods have been used to assess student's performance, for example, through assignments, tests, laboratory work, final examinations and group assignment. An issue that often arises is whether the assessment methods are actually testing the abilities of the students, in other words, whether the tasks or questions formulated are too easy or too difficult for academicians to ascertain whether students have achieved the stated programme outcomes. It will be necessary to verify the achievement through a quantitative and systematic assessment system. This paper reports a preliminary study on the assessment of the final examination questions of KJ4953 and KP4213 courses at the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for determining the difficulty index of examinations and how the index can be related to the achievement of programme outcomes (PO). For both KJ4953 and KP4213 courses in the 2009/2010 session, it is found that all the exams questions are appropriate to measure the programme outcomes for both courses as it can be classified as moderate and too hard with regards to their difficulty levels. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Kongres Pengajaran & Pembelajaran UKM, 2010
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effects of achievement motivation, task difficulty, and goal difficulty on physiological, behavioral, and subjective effort
    Capa, Remi L.
    Audiffren, Michel
    Ragot, Stephanie
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 45 (05) : 859 - 868
  • [42] Achievement Examinations for Elementary and Intermediate Swimming Classes
    Scott, M. Gladys
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1940, 11 (02): : 100 - 111
  • [43] Achievement Examinations for Elementary and Intermediate Tennis Classes
    Scott, M. Gladys
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1941, 12 (01): : 40 - 49
  • [44] ACHIEVEMENT OF PROGRAMME OUTCOMES THROUGH INTEGRATED PROJECT AS AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH FROM A TEACHING AND LEARNING PERSPECTIVE
    Othman, Nurtantiyani Ali
    Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah Sheikh
    Takriff, Mohd Sobri
    Rahman, Norliza Abd
    Kofli, Noorhisham Tan
    Ismali, Manal
    Hassan, Siti Zulaikha
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 10 : 61 - 73
  • [45] TEST OF VALIDITY OF FITTS' INDEX OF DIFFICULTY AS A MEASURE OF TASK DIFFICULTY
    Park, Sangbum
    Kim, Mihyun
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2008, 107 (03) : 901 - 914
  • [46] STUDENTS TASK-DIFFICULTY AND ACHIEVEMENT IN MATHEMATICS ON PROBLEMS OF MEDIUM TASK-DIFFICULTY
    KLOEP, M
    WEIMANN, F
    PSYCHOLOGIE IN ERZIEHUNG UND UNTERRICHT, 1982, 29 (02): : 76 - 80
  • [47] THE RELATION OF ABILITY TO ACHIEVEMENT
    Pyle, W. H.
    SCHOOL AND SOCIETY, 1925, 22 (561): : 406 - 408
  • [48] DOMINANCE IN RELATION TO ACHIEVEMENT
    SHAFER, SA
    LILLY, EC
    ACADEMIC THERAPY, 1970, 6 (02): : 177 - 185
  • [49] IMMUNOELECTROPHORETIC EXAMINATIONS IN RELATION TO HYPOGAMMAGLOBULINEMIA
    MEDGYESI, G
    SZIRMAI, E
    JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTION OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERS, 1972, 13 (02): : 47 - &
  • [50] Comment: Achievement Index
    White, R. A.
    Statistical Science, 12 (04):