Difficulty Index of Examinations and Their Relation to the Achievement of Programme Outcomes

被引:20
|
作者
Johari, Juridah [1 ]
Sahari, Jaafar [1 ]
Abd Wahab, Dzuraidah [1 ]
Abdullah, Shahrum [1 ]
Abdullah, Shahrir [1 ]
Omar, Mohd Zaidi [1 ]
Muhamad, Norhamidi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Ukm Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
Difficulty Index; Programme Outcomes (PO); Engineering Courses;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.011
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Verifications on the achievement of programme outcomes in engineering programmes is a key requirement in the accreditation of such programmes. Various methods have been used to assess student's performance, for example, through assignments, tests, laboratory work, final examinations and group assignment. An issue that often arises is whether the assessment methods are actually testing the abilities of the students, in other words, whether the tasks or questions formulated are too easy or too difficult for academicians to ascertain whether students have achieved the stated programme outcomes. It will be necessary to verify the achievement through a quantitative and systematic assessment system. This paper reports a preliminary study on the assessment of the final examination questions of KJ4953 and KP4213 courses at the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for determining the difficulty index of examinations and how the index can be related to the achievement of programme outcomes (PO). For both KJ4953 and KP4213 courses in the 2009/2010 session, it is found that all the exams questions are appropriate to measure the programme outcomes for both courses as it can be classified as moderate and too hard with regards to their difficulty levels. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Kongres Pengajaran & Pembelajaran UKM, 2010
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The relative difficulty of three achievement examinations
    Loyes, ME
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1935, 26 : 218 - 222
  • [2] Determining course outcomes achievement through examination difficulty index measurement
    Zainudin, Suhaila
    Ahmad, Kamsuriah
    Ali, Nazlena Mohamad
    Zainal, Noor Faridatul Ainun
    UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA TEACHING AND LEARNING CONGRESS 2011, VOL I, 2012, 59 : 270 - 276
  • [3] ITEM-DIFFICULTY SEQUENCE IN ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATIONS - EXAMINEES PREFERENCES AND TEST-TAKING STRATEGIES
    ALLISON, DE
    THOMAS, DC
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1986, 59 (02) : 867 - 870
  • [4] The profile variability index in relation to psychopathology and academic achievement
    Thurber, S
    Snow, M
    Lee, JP
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 162 (02): : 242 - 246
  • [5] Achievement Examinations in Badminton
    Scott, M. Gladys
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1941, 12 (02): : 242 - 253
  • [6] COMMENTS ON ACHIEVEMENT EXAMINATIONS
    Richardson, M. W.
    Stalnaker, John M.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1935, 28 (06): : 425 - 432
  • [7] Item difficulty index, discrimination index, and reliability of the 26 health professions licensing examinations in 2023, Korea: a psychometric study
    Kim, Yoon Hee
    Kim, Bo Hyun
    Kim, Joonki
    Jung, Bokyoung
    Bae, Sangyoung
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2024, 21
  • [8] Item difficulty index, discrimination index, and reliability of the 26 health professions licensing examinations in 2022, Korea: a psychometric study
    Kim, Yoon Hee
    Kim, Bo Hyun
    Kim, Joonki
    Jung, Bokyoung
    Bae, Sangyoung
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2023, 20
  • [9] TEST DIFFICULTY AS A FACTOR IN ACHIEVEMENT
    DAINES, JR
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1970, 64 (03): : 139 - &
  • [10] EQUALITY IN DIFFICULTY OF ALTERNATIVE INTELLIGENCE EXAMINATIONS
    Thorndike, Edward L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1920, 4 (04) : 283 - 288