Open Source Platform for Transperineal In-Bore MRI-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy

被引:1
|
作者
Herz, Christian [1 ]
Tuncali, Kemal [1 ]
Fedorov, Andriy [1 ]
MacNeil, Kyle [2 ]
Behringer, Peter A. [1 ]
Tokuda, Junichi [1 ]
Mehrtash, Alireza [1 ]
Mousavi, Parvin [2 ]
Kikinis, Ron [1 ]
Fennessy, Fiona M. [1 ]
Tempany, Clare M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Biopsy; Software; Needles; Tools; Glands; Three-dimensional displays; Image segmentation; Image-guided interventions; image registration; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; software evaluation; targeted biopsy; IMAGE REGISTRATION; ULTRASOUND FUSION; CANCER; SOFTWARE; STATE;
D O I
10.1109/TBME.2019.2918731
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective: Accurate biopsy sampling of the suspected lesions is critical for the diagnosis and clinical management of prostate cancer. Transperineal in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy (tpMRgBx) is a targeted biopsy technique that was shown to be safe, efficient, and accurate. Our goal was to develop an open source software platform to support evaluation, refinement, and translation of this biopsy approach. Methods: We developed SliceTracker, a 3D Slicer extension to support tpMRgBx. We followed modular design of the implementation to enable customization of the interface and interchange of image segmentation and registration components to assess their effect on the processing time, precision, and accuracy of the biopsy needle placement. The platform and supporting documentation were developed to enable the use of software by an operator with minimal technical training to facilitate translation. Retrospective evaluation studied registration accuracy, effect of the prostate segmentation approach, and re-identification time of biopsy targets. Prospective evaluation focused on the total procedure time and biopsy targeting error (BTE). Results: Evaluation utilized data from 73 retrospective and ten prospective tpMRgBx cases. Mean landmark registration error for retrospective evaluation was 1.88 & x00B1; 2.63 mm, and was not sensitive to the approach used for prostate gland segmentation. Prospectively, we observed target re-identification time of 4.60 & x00B1; 2.40 min and BTE of 2.40 & x00B1; 0.98 mm. Conclusion: SliceTracker is modular and extensible open source platform for supporting image processing aspects of the tpMRgBx procedure. It has been successfully utilized to support clinical research procedures at our site.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 576
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Workflow Assessment of 3T MRI-guided Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsy using a Robotic Needle Guidance
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Fennessy, Fiona
    Tempany, Clare
    Yoshimitsu, Kitaro
    Magill, John
    Hata, Nobuhiko
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2014, 9036
  • [42] Comparison of clinically significant prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive biopsy and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy for naive biopsy patients
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhang, Zhipeng
    Liu, Ming
    Zhu, Gang
    Roobol, Monique J.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [43] Comparison of clinically significant prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive biopsy and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy for naive biopsy patients
    Zhang, K.
    Zhang, Z.
    Zhu, G.
    Liu, M.
    Roobol, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 82 - 82
  • [44] Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard
    Schimmoeller, L.
    Quentin, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Lanzman, R. S.
    Hiester, A.
    Rabenalt, R.
    Antoch, G.
    Albers, P.
    Blondin, D.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (11) : 3185 - 3190
  • [45] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF MRI-U/S FUSION VERSUS IN-BORE MRI-TARGETED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Ramos, Francisco
    Korets, Ruslan
    Fleishman, Aaron
    Johnson, Michael
    Olumi, Aria
    Tsai, Leo
    Gershman, Boris
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E81 - E81
  • [46] Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard
    L. Schimmöller
    M. Quentin
    C. Arsov
    R. S. Lanzman
    A. Hiester
    R. Rabenalt
    G. Antoch
    P. Albers
    D. Blondin
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 3185 - 3190
  • [47] Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Preoperative Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Histopathologic Analysis: A Comparison Between In-Bore MRI-guided and MRI-Transrectal US Fusion Prostate Biopsies
    Costa, Daniel N.
    Cai, Qi
    Xi, Yin
    Recchimuzzi, Debora Z.
    Subramanian, Naveen
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Hornberger, Brad
    Shah, Rajal B.
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2021, 3 (02):
  • [48] Transperineal In-Bore 3-T MR Imaging-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective Clinical Observational Study
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Vangel, Mark G.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Mulkern, Robert V.
    Wells, William M.
    Hata, Nobuhiko
    Tempany, Clare M. C.
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (01) : 170 - 180
  • [49] Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required?
    L. Schimmöller
    M. Quentin
    D. Blondin
    F. Dietzel
    A. Hiester
    C. Schleich
    C. Thomas
    R. Rabenalt
    H. E. Gabbert
    P. Albers
    G. Antoch
    C. Arsov
    European Radiology, 2016, 26 : 3858 - 3864
  • [50] Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required?
    Schimmoeller, L.
    Quentin, M.
    Blondin, D.
    Dietzel, F.
    Hiester, A.
    Schleich, C.
    Thomas, C.
    Rabenalt, R.
    Gabbert, H. E.
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Arsov, C.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (11) : 3858 - 3864