Type IV gypsum compatibility with five addition-reaction silicone impression materials

被引:11
|
作者
Butta, R [1 ]
Tredwin, CJ [1 ]
Nesbit, M [1 ]
Moles, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Eastman Dept Inst, Dept Conservat Dent, London WC1X 8LD, England
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2005年 / 93卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. The compatibility of current addition-reaction silicone impression materials and Type IV gypsum products is not completely understood. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare surface detail reproduction between various combinations of contemporary addition-reaction silicone impression materials and Type IV gypsum products. Material and methods. Under standardized conditions, 300 impressions were made of a ruled stainless steel die (ADA specification 19), using 5 addition-reaction silicones (Examix-NDS, Doric-ES Flo-Light, Panasil Contact Plus, Extrude Wash, and President Plus Jet). Fifteen impressions of each material were poured with each Type TV gypsum product (Silky-Rock, Fuji Rock, Suprastone, or Vel-Mix). Using x12 magnification, 2 independent examiners scored the reproducibility of a 20-mu m line in both the impression and the resultant casts. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni testing (alpha=.05). Results. All impression materials tested fully reproduced the 20-mu m line. Different impression materials showed different compatibility with different Type TV gypsum products. Only 25% of the Type IV gypsum casts completely reproduced the resultant 20-mu m line with fine margins, and 88% of the completely reproduced casts were made from Suprastone. Conclusion. Not all combinations of impression material and Type IV gypsum products used exhibited similar compatibility.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 544
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modulated differential scanning calorimetric study of addition silicone impression materials.
    Vickery, JM
    Brantley, WA
    Weddle, BJ
    Gallagher, PK
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 125 - 125
  • [32] Effect of glass filler content on hydrophilic addition silicone impression materials in dentistry
    Kang, JK
    Lee, YK
    Kim, KM
    Kim, KN
    BIOCERAMICS 17, 2005, 284-286 : 909 - 912
  • [33] DENTAL PROCEDURE GLOVES AND THE SET OF ADDITION-CURED SILICONE IMPRESSION MATERIALS
    URBANSKA, DK
    GREGORY, MJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1988, 67 (04) : 673 - 673
  • [34] Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials
    Lu, H
    Nguyen, B
    Powers, JM
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 92 (02): : 151 - 154
  • [35] Margin fit of new hydrophilic addition reaction silicone impression material.
    Christensen, WG
    Amidan, BG
    Christensen, RP
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 2865 - 2865
  • [36] WETTABILITY OF ADDITION SILICONE IMPRESSION MATERIALS MODIFIED BY NON-IONIC SURFACTANTS
    BRUKL, CE
    NORLING, BK
    KALMUS, SR
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1979, 58 : 143 - 143
  • [37] COMPATIBILITY OF TYPE-III AND TYPE-IV DENTAL STONES WITH ELASTOMERIC IMPRESSION MATERIAL
    BRINDIS, E
    BARCELO, F
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1989, 68 (04) : 695 - 695
  • [38] RELATIVE DIMENSIONAL STABILITY OF ADDITION-CURED SILICONE AND OTHER ELASTOMERIC IMPRESSION MATERIALS
    AMORRORTU, FJ
    BROWN, D
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1979, 58 : 1272 - 1272
  • [39] ADDITION CURING SILICONE-RUBBER IMPRESSION MATERIALS - APPRAISAL OF THEIR PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES
    MCCABE, JF
    WILSON, HJ
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1978, 145 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [40] The effect of disinfection and a wetting agent on the wettability of addition-polymerized silicone impression materials
    Milward, PJ
    Waters, MG
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 86 (02): : 165 - 167